ADVERTISEMENT

Should the government give away Ozempic?

Should the government give away Ozempic?


  • Total voters
    43
Says the guy who routinely misquotes and misinterprets medical info.
You claimed they weren't giving ozempic to 6 year olds. Then you admitted they are. Now you're claiming you never moved the goal posts. 🤡🤡🤡
 
Ozemlic is a lifetime drug, not a jump start one. The fact that they're trying to push this on kids as young as 6 for obesity is astounding. The tax payer needs to stop paying 10 billion a year to big soda as a single example. Think of all the downstream costs associated with that stupidity.
You can discontinue ozempic.
Anyone trying to equate ‘slight inflammation at the injection site’ type warning to a black box warning is nothing but a Pharma shill.

Oh, and Tylenol has ‘very low risks and a very good safety profile’? LMFAO!

Acetaminophen overdose is the leading cause for calls to Poison Control Centers (>100,000/year) and accounts for more than 56,000 emergency room visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and an estimated 458 deaths due to acute liver failure each year. Data from the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group registry of more than 700 patients with acute liver failure across the United States implicates acetaminophen poisoning in nearly 50% of all acute liver failure in this country.


It’s ad ‘nauseam’, genius.

Not ad nauseum.

In January, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued new and controversial guidelines recommending weight loss drugs to kids as young as 12 and weight loss surgery for those just one year older.


Whichever federal agency is paying you to spread misinformation on behalf of Big Pharma is getting ripped off. No wonder this country is $35 trillion in debt. 🤡
Tylenol is safe when used properly. It is frequently overdosed because it is readily available, is often included in combo drugs, and people do underestimate its risk when taking it. Almost anything can be harmful when used in excess. Water is unsafe if you consume too much.
 
If the board’s resident Pharma whore says the country’s leading cause of Acute Liver Failure is ‘safe’ and carries ‘low risk’ then that’s good enough for me, damnit! :rolleyes:

The Acute Liver Failure Study Group’s research led to an understanding of how acetaminophen poisoning became the No. 1 cause of ALF in the United States. It’s now responsible for 46 percent of all cases and for approximately 500 deaths and 50,000 emergency room visits each year, said Dr. William M. Lee, Professor of Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern, founder of the study group, and an internationally renowned expert in liver disease.

The impetus for the multisite acute liver failure study began in 1993, when Dr. Lee noticed that two-thirds of the patients treated at Dallas’ Parkland Memorial Hospital for acute liver failure had consumed alcohol while taking acetaminophen. His findings were reported in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that year. A follow-up study, published in NEJM four years later, found that while the majority of Parkland patients with acetaminophen-related liver injury intentionally took too much of the drug in a suicide attempt, almost a third had accidently poisoned themselves, simply trying to relieve pain. And, Dr. Lee’s research found, those accidental overdose patients were more likely to die.

These findings convinced Dr. Lee to apply for a National Institutes of Health grant to study ALF in all its forms as well as the acetaminophen link.

“Past a certain point, acetaminophen overwhelms the liver’s ability to safely metabolize it and becomes a poison, killing liver cells and causing swelling of the brain,” Dr. Lee said.

Still, Dr. Lee is frustrated by the continued deaths and need for liver transplants linked to overdoses of this over-the-counter medication. “Acetaminophen actually dwarfs by three times the number of liver-injury deaths related to all prescription drugs – which is kind of bizarre because it’s over-the-counter. It’s readily available in hundreds of tablets at a time.” (utsouthwestern.edu)
 
If the board’s resident Pharma whore says the country’s leading cause of Acute Liver Failure is ‘safe’ and carries ‘low risk’ then that’s good enough for me, damnit! :rolleyes:

The Acute Liver Failure Study Group’s research led to an understanding of how acetaminophen poisoning became the No. 1 cause of ALF in the United States. It’s now responsible for 46 percent of all cases and for approximately 500 deaths and 50,000 emergency room visits each year, said Dr. William M. Lee, Professor of Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern, founder of the study group, and an internationally renowned expert in liver disease.

The impetus for the multisite acute liver failure study began in 1993, when Dr. Lee noticed that two-thirds of the patients treated at Dallas’ Parkland Memorial Hospital for acute liver failure had consumed alcohol while taking acetaminophen. His findings were reported in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that year. A follow-up study, published in NEJM four years later, found that while the majority of Parkland patients with acetaminophen-related liver injury intentionally took too much of the drug in a suicide attempt, almost a third had accidently poisoned themselves, simply trying to relieve pain. And, Dr. Lee’s research found, those accidental overdose patients were more likely to die.

These findings convinced Dr. Lee to apply for a National Institutes of Health grant to study ALF in all its forms as well as the acetaminophen link.

“Past a certain point, acetaminophen overwhelms the liver’s ability to safely metabolize it and becomes a poison, killing liver cells and causing swelling of the brain,” Dr. Lee said.


Still, Dr. Lee is frustrated by the continued deaths and need for liver transplants linked to overdoses of this over-the-counter medication. “Acetaminophen actually dwarfs by three times the number of liver-injury deaths related to all prescription drugs – which is kind of bizarre because it’s over-the-counter. It’s readily available in hundreds of tablets at a time.” (utsouthwestern.edu)
Taking too much of a medication can be harmful. You can't make medications that have 0 side effects particularly when people are taking excessive quantities of said medication.

The debate you could have here would be is the dispensing and the recommended dosing fine. You could discuss changing those parameters.
 
Taking too much of a medication can be harmful. You can't make medications that have 0 side effects particularly when people are taking excessive quantities of said medication.

The debate you could have here would be is the dispensing and the recommended dosing fine. You could discuss changing those parameters.
The problem with acetminophen is that it is present in a lot of other products that people take…a fine line between symptom relief and liver failure. The FDA’s been passing the buck on this poison for almost 50 years. That’s criminal.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has long been aware of studies showing the risks of acetaminophen – in particular, that the margin between the amount that helps and the amount that can cause serious harm is smaller than for other pain relievers.

In 1977, an expert panel convened by the FDA issued urgently worded advice, saying it was “obligatory” to put a warning on the drug’s label that it could cause “severe liver damage.” After much debate, the FDA added the warning 32 years later. The panel’s recommendation was part of a broader review to set safety rules for acetaminophen, which is still not finished.

Safety Delay

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
4762810120
YEARSMONTHSDAYSHOURSMINUTESSECONDS

In the 1970s, the Food and Drug Administration appointed an expert panel to review the safety and efficacy of over-the-counter pain relievers, including acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol. The panel delivered their recommendations on April 5, 1977. At the time, the FDA estimated it would issue final regulations before the end of 1978. The agency has still not completed its work. This is how much time has passed since then. Find out more »

 
You claimed they weren't giving ozempic to 6 year olds.
I disagreed with you they were "pushing" Ozempic on to 6 yr olds.

You were referring to the manufacturer; it was a clinical trial, with Duke University Pediatric staff recruiting volunteers in a study.
Not remotely the same thing.
 
I disagreed with you they were "pushing" Ozempic on to 6 yr olds.

You were referring to the manufacturer; it was a clinical trial, with Duke University Pediatric staff recruiting volunteers in a study.
Not remotely the same thing.
They're not giving it to 6 year olds in trials to not push it on 6 year olds down the road which you also admitted to. Take your L.
 
They're not giving it to 6 year olds in trials to not push it on 6 year olds down the road

Now we're waffling here.
They ran a clinical study.

The study demonstrated significant benefits, which a pediatrician outlined for you. She also discussed risks.
 
I prefer cocaine as my weight loss drug and.yes I am in favor of government paying for it
.
 
Now we're waffling here.
They ran a clinical study.

The study demonstrated significant benefits, which a pediatrician outlined for you. She also discussed risks.
So they're aiming to push it on 6 year olds. Got it.
 
It's still acetaminophen.
And still has warning labels attached.
There are more than 600 prescription and OTC products containing acetaminophen. The expectation that consumers are going to be aware of the overdose potential that comes from barely exceeding the RDA is almost nonexistent.

In the past 70 years, this ‘safe, low risk’ ☠️ has been responsible for > 5,000,000 ER visits, 100,000 liver failures and 10,000 deaths.

Nothing short of criminal malfeasance that it’s still on the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scruddy
There are more than 600 prescription and OTC products containing acetaminophen. The expectation that consumers are going to be aware of the overdose potential that comes from barely exceeding the RDA is almost nonexistent.

In the past 70 years, this ‘safe, low risk’ ☠️ has been responsible for > 5,000,000 ER visits, 100,000 liver failures and 10,000 deaths.

Nothing short of criminal malfeasance that it’s still on the market.
It's not criminal as long as you pay off the right people in power
 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
It's not criminal as long as you pay off the right people in power
it takes a lot to wade through the mountains of shit in this thread,

but we're now saying that regular tylenol is only legal because "people in power" are paid off?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3boysmom
it takes a lot to wade through the mountains of shit in this thread,

but we're now saying that regular tylenol is only legal because "people in power" are paid off?
That's what they're claiming.

Just imagine what they'll find if they look on their packets of "Hims" Viagra doses!!!!
 
In the past 70 years, this ‘safe, low risk’ ☠️ has been responsible for > 5,000,000 ER visits, 100,000 liver failures and 10,000 deaths.
Out of billions of doses (probably hundreds of billions), those percentages are miniscule.
Which is why it is an OTC medication.
 
News flash, country of fat pigs want a pill to was away their doritos and pizza and want to hand the bill to future generations. And of course @Joes Place would support anything his big pharmaceutical overlords want.
Whoring for Big Pharma is all he knows. Doesn’t matter how many people suffer injuries or death because of their garbage products.
 
Whoring for Big Pharma is all he knows. Doesn’t matter how many people suffer injuries or death because of their garbage products.
just wait until you hear about these new things called "antibiotics"

responsible for EVEN MORE emergency room visits than tylenol

we need to do something about these very dangerous death pills that big pharma has convinced us are OK to take
 
I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
Good luck. I’d love to see it, but that’s going to be tough to pull off. As always, attacking a problem from multiple angles is usually the best approach. Need to encourage being less sedentary, eating healthier food/more reasonable portions, finding medical/pharmacological interventions where it makes sense, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3boysmom
Good luck. I’d love to see it, but that’s going to be tough to pull off. As always, attacking a problem from multiple angles is usually the best approach. Need to encourage being less sedentary, eating healthier food/more reasonable portions, finding medical/pharmacological interventions where it makes sense, etc.
I totally agree to some extent, maybe phase 1 is tackling the current obesity issue by issuing a pharmaceutical solution, then the next step is eliminating foods on the shelves that provide little to no nutritional benefit( sugary cereals, etc.) and so on.
 
I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
we realize that this is calling for MORE GOVT REGULATION, right?

i just find it wierd where people do and don't trust/blame american consumers for the state of the american consumer markets
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3boysmom
I totally agree to some extent, maybe phase 1 is tackling the current obesity issue by issuing a pharmaceutical solution, then the next step is eliminating foods on the shelves that provide little to no nutritional benefit( sugary cereals, etc.) and so on.
This would be an unprecedented step of government intervention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3boysmom
difference between Gatorade and Pepsi is carbonation. Both are full of “empty calories”.

No way can you start making some food illegal to sell.

Going to stop selling canola oil because somebody might fry something? Roflmao.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
I'd be in favor of eliminating the "food stamps" to buy this stuff vs having more nutritious stuff delivered or handed off where it does not include all the garbage. Would cost less, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CAhawki
I'm not against this.

How?
1% income tax. You go to a doctor once a year (for free) and if you are not overweight you get your money back plus a portion of all the money fat people forfeited.

People love contests like this. We have had some at my work and some people drop 50+ pounds to win a couple hundred dollars.
 


Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "Today, over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once a drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid.

And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition, obesity, that is completely preventable and barely even existed 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3 trillion a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe.

It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk's entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture, organic food for every American three meals a day and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, the media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them."
Is it cost effective?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT