Only, that's not reality.
But you'll continue to parrot it ad nauseum.
You are an actual clown.This is simply lying now.
Says the guy who routinely misquotes and misinterprets medical info.You are an actual clown.
You claimed they weren't giving ozempic to 6 year olds. Then you admitted they are. Now you're claiming you never moved the goal posts. 🤡🤡🤡Says the guy who routinely misquotes and misinterprets medical info.
You can discontinue ozempic.Ozemlic is a lifetime drug, not a jump start one. The fact that they're trying to push this on kids as young as 6 for obesity is astounding. The tax payer needs to stop paying 10 billion a year to big soda as a single example. Think of all the downstream costs associated with that stupidity.
Tylenol is safe when used properly. It is frequently overdosed because it is readily available, is often included in combo drugs, and people do underestimate its risk when taking it. Almost anything can be harmful when used in excess. Water is unsafe if you consume too much.Anyone trying to equate ‘slight inflammation at the injection site’ type warning to a black box warning is nothing but a Pharma shill.
Oh, and Tylenol has ‘very low risks and a very good safety profile’? LMFAO!
Acetaminophen overdose is the leading cause for calls to Poison Control Centers (>100,000/year) and accounts for more than 56,000 emergency room visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and an estimated 458 deaths due to acute liver failure each year. Data from the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group registry of more than 700 patients with acute liver failure across the United States implicates acetaminophen poisoning in nearly 50% of all acute liver failure in this country.
It’s ad ‘nauseam’, genius.
Not ad nauseum.
In January, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued new and controversial guidelines recommending weight loss drugs to kids as young as 12 and weight loss surgery for those just one year older.
Whichever federal agency is paying you to spread misinformation on behalf of Big Pharma is getting ripped off. No wonder this country is $35 trillion in debt. 🤡
Taking too much of a medication can be harmful. You can't make medications that have 0 side effects particularly when people are taking excessive quantities of said medication.If the board’s resident Pharma whore says the country’s leading cause of Acute Liver Failure is ‘safe’ and carries ‘low risk’ then that’s good enough for me, damnit!
The Acute Liver Failure Study Group’s research led to an understanding of how acetaminophen poisoning became the No. 1 cause of ALF in the United States. It’s now responsible for 46 percent of all cases and for approximately 500 deaths and 50,000 emergency room visits each year, said Dr. William M. Lee, Professor of Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern, founder of the study group, and an internationally renowned expert in liver disease.
The impetus for the multisite acute liver failure study began in 1993, when Dr. Lee noticed that two-thirds of the patients treated at Dallas’ Parkland Memorial Hospital for acute liver failure had consumed alcohol while taking acetaminophen. His findings were reported in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that year. A follow-up study, published in NEJM four years later, found that while the majority of Parkland patients with acetaminophen-related liver injury intentionally took too much of the drug in a suicide attempt, almost a third had accidently poisoned themselves, simply trying to relieve pain. And, Dr. Lee’s research found, those accidental overdose patients were more likely to die.
These findings convinced Dr. Lee to apply for a National Institutes of Health grant to study ALF in all its forms as well as the acetaminophen link.
“Past a certain point, acetaminophen overwhelms the liver’s ability to safely metabolize it and becomes a poison, killing liver cells and causing swelling of the brain,” Dr. Lee said.
Still, Dr. Lee is frustrated by the continued deaths and need for liver transplants linked to overdoses of this over-the-counter medication. “Acetaminophen actually dwarfs by three times the number of liver-injury deaths related to all prescription drugs – which is kind of bizarre because it’s over-the-counter. It’s readily available in hundreds of tablets at a time.” (utsouthwestern.edu)
The problem with acetminophen is that it is present in a lot of other products that people take…a fine line between symptom relief and liver failure. The FDA’s been passing the buck on this poison for almost 50 years. That’s criminal.Taking too much of a medication can be harmful. You can't make medications that have 0 side effects particularly when people are taking excessive quantities of said medication.
The debate you could have here would be is the dispensing and the recommended dosing fine. You could discuss changing those parameters.
47 | 6 | 28 | 10 | 12 | 0 |
YEARS | MONTHS | DAYS | HOURS | MINUTES | SECONDS |
I disagreed with you they were "pushing" Ozempic on to 6 yr olds.You claimed they weren't giving ozempic to 6 year olds.
The problem with acetminophen is that it is present in a lot of other products that people take
They're not giving it to 6 year olds in trials to not push it on 6 year olds down the road which you also admitted to. Take your L.I disagreed with you they were "pushing" Ozempic on to 6 yr olds.
You were referring to the manufacturer; it was a clinical trial, with Duke University Pediatric staff recruiting volunteers in a study.
Not remotely the same thing.
They're not giving it to 6 year olds in trials to not push it on 6 year olds down the road
So they're aiming to push it on 6 year olds. Got it.Now we're waffling here.
They ran a clinical study.
The study demonstrated significant benefits, which a pediatrician outlined for you. She also discussed risks.
There are more than 600 prescription and OTC products containing acetaminophen. The expectation that consumers are going to be aware of the overdose potential that comes from barely exceeding the RDA is almost nonexistent.It's still acetaminophen.
And still has warning labels attached.
It's not criminal as long as you pay off the right people in powerThere are more than 600 prescription and OTC products containing acetaminophen. The expectation that consumers are going to be aware of the overdose potential that comes from barely exceeding the RDA is almost nonexistent.
In the past 70 years, this ‘safe, low risk’ ☠️ has been responsible for > 5,000,000 ER visits, 100,000 liver failures and 10,000 deaths.
Nothing short of criminal malfeasance that it’s still on the market.
it takes a lot to wade through the mountains of shit in this thread,It's not criminal as long as you pay off the right people in power
Not quite but good effortit takes a lot to wade through the mountains of shit in this thread,
but we're now saying that regular tylenol is only legal because "people in power" are paid off?
That's because it has a very good safety profile.There are more than 600 prescription and OTC products containing acetaminophen.
That's what they're claiming.it takes a lot to wade through the mountains of shit in this thread,
but we're now saying that regular tylenol is only legal because "people in power" are paid off?
Out of billions of doses (probably hundreds of billions), those percentages are miniscule.In the past 70 years, this ‘safe, low risk’ ☠️ has been responsible for > 5,000,000 ER visits, 100,000 liver failures and 10,000 deaths.
Whoring for Big Pharma is all he knows. Doesn’t matter how many people suffer injuries or death because of their garbage products.News flash, country of fat pigs want a pill to was away their doritos and pizza and want to hand the bill to future generations. And of course @Joes Place would support anything his big pharmaceutical overlords want.
just wait until you hear about these new things called "antibiotics"Whoring for Big Pharma is all he knows. Doesn’t matter how many people suffer injuries or death because of their garbage products.
Good luck. I’d love to see it, but that’s going to be tough to pull off. As always, attacking a problem from multiple angles is usually the best approach. Need to encourage being less sedentary, eating healthier food/more reasonable portions, finding medical/pharmacological interventions where it makes sense, etc.I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
I totally agree to some extent, maybe phase 1 is tackling the current obesity issue by issuing a pharmaceutical solution, then the next step is eliminating foods on the shelves that provide little to no nutritional benefit( sugary cereals, etc.) and so on.Good luck. I’d love to see it, but that’s going to be tough to pull off. As always, attacking a problem from multiple angles is usually the best approach. Need to encourage being less sedentary, eating healthier food/more reasonable portions, finding medical/pharmacological interventions where it makes sense, etc.
we realize that this is calling for MORE GOVT REGULATION, right?I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
It is truly mystifying.we realize that this is calling for MORE GOVT REGULATION, right?
i just find it wierd where people do and don't trust/blame american consumers for the state of the american consumer markets
This would be an unprecedented step of government intervention.I totally agree to some extent, maybe phase 1 is tackling the current obesity issue by issuing a pharmaceutical solution, then the next step is eliminating foods on the shelves that provide little to no nutritional benefit( sugary cereals, etc.) and so on.
I'd be in favor of eliminating the "food stamps" to buy this stuff vs having more nutritious stuff delivered or handed off where it does not include all the garbage. Would cost less, too.I would much rather the gov push to eliminate overly-processed food from American shelves...
MAGAs aren't renowned for their consistency on "conservative" topics...This would be an unprecedented step of government intervention.
I'm not against this.Tax fat people.
Don’t regulate people that can handle food.
1% income tax. You go to a doctor once a year (for free) and if you are not overweight you get your money back plus a portion of all the money fat people forfeited.I'm not against this.
How?
Is it cost effective?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "Today, over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once a drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid.
And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition, obesity, that is completely preventable and barely even existed 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3 trillion a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe.
It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk's entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture, organic food for every American three meals a day and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, the media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them."