Because many got caught voicing those opinions without even all the facts in front of them. To me, that's not an opinion, but a billboard. Non-communcative and just there to be annoying. Again, if you go back from the start count how many jumped down Fran's throat presuming he marched off only because of the last second steal and shot.
Does that make for an informed opinion?
And I suppose I'm pushing a rock up a hill on to see it roll back down again, but wouldn't it be nice if people held off with the coach bashing (that's how I read much of it) long enough to know if it was warranted?
Thanks, by the way, you are right, this board is for opinions. So I am not sure why you turned the discussion away from what I thought to why I think that way?
You bring up a great point about waiting to form an opinion until you know sufficient facts. This is often the basis of unfair coach-bashing; many who second-guess the decisions of coaches actually have much less information than the coach himself and thus their criticism is hollow. We see this with criticism of both Ferentz and Fran on many occasions.
With that said, in this situation I still believe there was enough information to form an opinion about whether they should have shook hands just by watching the game. North Dakota made a few bush-league plays in the final moments of last night's game. I think everyone agrees that Iowa's players and coaches had a right to be pissed based on what they witnessed. Given this information, there appear to be two camps of people: (1) While Fran should be pissed, he should suck it up and shake hands and privately communicate his frustration with Jones; (2) Fran should be pissed, and given the bush-league antics of North Dakota, Fran shouldn't have bothered shaking hands.
I don't see any subsequent facts that came out that would change the opinion of either camp of people. The fact that Jones made a "count-it" signal is another bush-league move that wasn't immediately recognizable to viewers, but the principal of the argument of those in the first camp is that even if your opponent has been classless, you still take the high road and shake hands. A good example that comes to mind is Denzil Washington's character in Remember the Titans when he offers to shake hands with the opposing coach that said earlier in the week "
I'm not gonna do anything to help that monkey." Denzil's character took the high road and offered a handshake, and when he was denied he gave the classless coach a banana. Taking the high road doesn't mean you let others push you around, it just means that you won't let the classless acts of others affect your behavior.
In the end, I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way because I do believe Fran was justified, but I still would have liked him to shake hands. Fran is an emotional guy, and I like that about him, but there are times when he can go a little too far with his on-court antics - and with that said I also think it's worth noting that, to Fran's credit, he doesn't take his anger out on postgame interviewers, unlike some other fiery coaches (Bob Knight, Bo Pelini, etc.).
I am very happy with the job Fran has done at Iowa, and I think he is a good representative for the University of Iowa, but I do disagree with his actions on occasion. Even with disagreement, however, I recognize the reasonableness of his actions and the opinions of others, which is why I don't really have a problem with him not shaking hands with North Dakota. With that said, Dan, I believe you and I have a slight difference of opinion, but I recognize the reasonableness of the points you make and your opinion on the matter, so I offer my imaginary hand out to you for an imaginary handshake. Go Hawks!