Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have to separate what Elon says versus what his companies have done. Tesla and SpaceX both adding Bitcoin while he’s publicly criticizing it.
I'm going to let it keep you up instead.Pretend I’m stupid and explain the gif.
Bitcoiners still mad at old Elon?
Tesla still holds ~90% of the original purchase or something like 25,000 BTC.
Musk is a charlatan. Whenever Tesla gets bad news he changes the conversation. Chinese buying down big and stopping a plant build in China.... tweet if they should accept dogecoin.
Tesla semi? Where?
Probably not a big deal here, but wonder why something like this gets to the point where it becomes an out in the open public event:
JPMorgan sues Tesla for $162 mln after Musk tweets soured warrant deal
JPMorgan Chase & Co has sued Tesla Inc for $162.2 million, accusing Elon Musk's electric car company of "flagrantly" breaching a contract the two corporate giants agreed in 2014 relating to warrants Tesla sold to the bank.www.reuters.com
JP Morgan one of the worst manipulators of information out there. $TSLA should just buy them out.
JP Morgan one of the worst manipulators of information out there. $TSLA should just buy them out.
Musk is a charlatan. Whenever Tesla gets bad news he changes the conversation. Chinese buying down big and stopping a plant build in China.... tweet if they should accept dogecoin.
Tesla semi? Where? Tesla solar panels? Close the plant, not making money.
Would love me a 500 mile Tesla truck.
The thing is vaporware. It was supposed to be in production by now. They still haven’t purchased the tooling to build it.
And you may wanna look at how damaging mining for battery components is...Evidently you need to read up on how much electricity Cryptocurrency mining uses.
Not nearly as damaging as the wastes from fossil fuels. Not sure what your point is with this statement.And you may wanna look at how damaging mining for battery components is...
Really? May wanna look into a bit.Not nearly as damaging as the wastes from fossil fuels. Not sure what your point is with this statement.
And you may wanna look at how damaging mining for battery components is...
Nickel mining is not misinformation.Funny you should mention that oil company misinformation tidbit.
Thread 'Lying Liars & The Lies They Tell About Electric Cars'
https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/threads/lying-liars-the-lies-they-tell-about-electric-cars.379458/
“While it is expected that direct emissions of BEVs are lower than those of ICEVs, it is surprising that in fact non–tailpipe emissions are also lower.”
The thing is vaporware. It was supposed to be in production by now. They still haven’t purchased the tooling to build it.
There are also Weiner-mobiles driving around. Building a few cybertruck mules doesn’t mean the thing is anywhere near a reality.Whoever the guy or gal’s job it is to drive this vaporware around will surely appreciate this information!
The business is cell/supply constrained, they are optimizing battery cell deployment to maximize profits and further the mission. Ie making cars not semis. Besides, Tesla Semi won’t go into production until 4680 supply production scale has been reached. Need about 1 more year, give or take. Tesla, Panasonic, CATL, and others will all be producing 4680s by then I believe.
Maybe delayed things waiting for pandemic issues to abate?Like I said, the thing was promised in 2019 and meant to be delivered in 2021. It’ll be 2022 next week and they haven’t bought the tooling to build this.
The pandemic and the chip shortage didn’t change the economics of the thing. The pricing they stated just doesn’t make sense. It’s not a desirable project for them, so it’s on the back burner.Maybe delayed things waiting for pandemic issues to abate?
If existing production was affected, I can only assume bringing additional production online would exacerbate that in the short term.
With respect to tooling costs for the truck's manufacturer, this is interesting:
Sounds like you are the misinformed one here.Really? May wanna look into a bit.
The pandemic and the chip shortage didn’t change the economics of the thing. The pricing they stated just doesn’t make sense. It’s not a desirable project for them, so it’s on the back burner.
They haven’t even decided on a size for the thing, whether it will have side mirrors, or how any of the unsexy stuff like windshield wipers will work. Elon keeps adding things to his wishlist that will dramatically change the engineering of the thing, four-wheel steering and changing the motor array.
It’s been two years. They still don’t have a final design. Rivian is delivering vehicles. Ford has given dealerships dates for the Lightning.
...Tesla will first need to set mass production of 4680 battery cells that will power the electric pickup truck, which will probably only happen by the end of 2021. In this regard, Musk said that if the company is lucky, the first few deliveries of Cybertruck will begin in 2021, but mass production is not expected until 2022.
Elon added 4-wheel steering to the thing in July of this year, and said it would be able to crab walk in response to the Hummer.I don't follow this closely, but how old is that info?
January 28, 2021
Cybertruck's design turned out to be incredibly inviting, but Tesla made some changes to its original appearance, which was unveiled at the presentation. However, for now, the company has finished all the development of the pickup, and is no longer iterating at the design level, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said during the Q4 2020 Earnings Call.
...Tesla will first need to set mass production of 4680 battery cells that will power the electric pickup truck, which will probably only happen by the end of 2021. In this regard, Musk said that if the company is lucky, the first few deliveries of Cybertruck will begin in 2021, but mass production is not expected until 2022.
The mirror thing is kind of funny. Bumping into archaic law:
In the case of side mirrors - they are required by law in the U.S. (Europe already allows the use of cameras and displays), which means that they must stay in this form or something similar.
However, since owners are allowed to modify their vehicles, the side mirrors will probably be removable. As we understand, Tesla will make them easily removable so the owner could use cameras/displays instead.
I'm going out on a limb and expecting the company that most engineers want to go work for will come up with a windshield wiper. Just kind of hard to imagine the project gets this far, and falters on a windshield wiper.
I'm not. EVs are fantastic once produced, but the production is often overlooked and come with their own set of drawbacks that many EV owners claim they're against.Sounds like you are the misinformed one here.
420/69 cubits.Here’s a question: How long is the Cyber Truck?
This is the same argument people who try to denigrate wind turbines use. The reality is though, that while there are some negative effects (because building anything does this), those issues are miniscule in comparisson to the primary issue EV's are meant to address and that is climate change. So to sit there and try to insinuate that EV's are just as bad as gas vehicles is either completely disingenuous or very uninformed. Neither one of those is good.I'm not. EVs are fantastic once produced, but the production is often overlooked and come with their own set of drawbacks that many EV owners claim they're against.
what is your definition of 'minuscule'?This is the same argument people who try to denigrate wind turbines use. The reality is though, that while there are some negative effects (because building anything does this), those issues are miniscule in comparisson to the primary issue EV's are meant to address and that is climate change. So to sit there and try to insinuate that EV's are just as bad as gas vehicles is either completely disingenuous or very uninformed. Neither one of those is good.