ADVERTISEMENT

The CC Show....

Was the game on during church then?
Do a lot of MAGAts watch women’s basketball any day of the week? It’s not like there were a ton of Trumpsters who stayed up until 2 o’clock in the morning to watch the US beat Japan in 2021 but had to skip this year’s gold medal game because it was on a Sunday morning.
 
So now CC would have changed all of this...

She probably would have played fewer minutes than Taurasi after turning the ball over 10+ times against Belgium. You do remember that she was not "the star" in the WNBA AS game, right?
She was not 'the star' but she was 'a star' in the AS game. Yeah, she was 0-7 from 3, but half of those were 35-40 footers she was putting up for the fans/courtside players. 2nd most assists in AS game history. You list the stars of the game and she isn't going to be any lower than 4th or 5th behind AO, Stewie, A'ja and maybe AR.
 
You're an idiot if you don't think Caitlin Clark being on that team would have instantly raised ratings but he knows that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinehawk
That's what the data have looked like for nearly 20 years.

(and do you think the MAGA churchgoers are watching the game on Sunday morning vs. going to church here? Jeebus)
Now we see why Joe is a hater and doesn't watch games.. he equates Caitlin with MAGA. Are you really this stupid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkeyeShawn
You do not appear to understand the point here.

And if you look at CCs game just after June 10th, she tanked in that Connecticut game, badly.
There are "error bars" attached to anyone's ranking, any place you look at their productivity. When those overlap, the players are effectively "equal", which is what you get when you compare the specific players your buddies are bitching about in this thread.
Except one was better than the other. You were the one that said that before you wanted to change criteria......again....you are reminding me of the Chris Farley SNL interviews.....'you remember, that one time, that there was a bad game.....'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bro D
Because Dawn Staley being interviewed at the Olympics, weeks after the selection process, is referring to those games.
That was what I'd posted pages ago for you.

CCs productivity did not differ much at all against what other guards selected had done either early season, or in past seasons. Only, she never participated in tryouts, and her WNBA track record was much shorter than her competition for the spots.
Objection, relevance your honor.......sustained...joe just because you referenced it previously doesn't make it relevant to the subject at hand.

And to clarify, when she mentioned those games she said that 'she would have been considered' to which you(solid job of ignoring this repeatedly) came up with 'Probably make the team'
How one leads to the other makes sense....to you. Another solid 'throw it at the wall and hope nobody realizes how asinine it is.' effort
 
Objection, relevance your honor.......sustained...joe just because you referenced it previously doesn't make it relevant to the subject at hand.

And to clarify, when she mentioned those games she said that 'she would have been considered' to which you(solid job of ignoring this repeatedly) came up with 'Probably make the team'
How one leads to the other makes sense....to you. Another solid 'throw it at the wall and hope nobody realizes how asinine it is.' effort
All of his garbage arguments are bullshit when the real true reason is something something MAGA. What a turd. I'd advise everyone to quit arguing with this sad little man
 
So now CC would have changed all of this...

She probably would have played fewer minutes than Taurasi after turning the ball over 10+ times against Belgium. You do remember that she was not "the star" in the WNBA AS game, right?
So now CC would have changed all of this...

Well the statistics have very clearly demonstrated that her presence has driven ratings.


She probably would have played fewer minutes than Taurasi after turning the ball over 10+ times against Belgium.
With that coach? Not a solid chance she sees the floor in any game.

"You do remember that she was not "the star" in the WNBA AS game, right?"
Objection......relevance......... Sustained, this has no relevance to the subject at hand. The person raising the issue is the same person who told us it wasn't pertinent to the selection.


You need to stay on task a little better. I haven't seen anyone throwing you a life preserver yet. Heck I haven't even seen someone acknowledging the validity of any of your desperate attempts.

And don't worry, I haven't forgot that I asked for some specifics that you haven't been able to provide. Wonder why you haven't.........
 
Somewhere in there does it mention that the Fever have over 800 million social media views in the last 4 months?
That’s a lot of churchgoers. It’s also more views than any team in the WNBA, NBA, NHL, MLB and some league called the NFL.

FYI draft beer sales are up 740%.

She definitely wouldn’t have moved the needke(according to Joe and…… well just Joe)

Take the L. Still waiting on the specifics. Oh and to explain how you got to ‘probably make the team’ from ‘might be considered’
Diminished credibility for Joe in this thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinehawk
Oh, churchgoers aren't BB fans, then?
Not the “MAGA churchgoers” that you specifically referenced. Why would Trumpsters watch a bunch of Black lesbians who won’t even stand at attention for the National Anthem?
 
So now CC would have changed all of this...

Well the statistics have very clearly demonstrated that her presence has driven ratings.
Her PLAY drives ratings.

If she is not PLAYING, people will not tune in. And she has not played well against strong defenses, like Team USA encountered in Paris.
She did not play well in the AS game, against the Team USA defense; sure, good assists, and few points.

Will she improve? Absolutely.
 
Will Ferrell Loser GIF
 
Whatever this means.

She was not taking away playing time from the primary guards on the team. Plum, Copper, Ionescu
needke

So now a typo is the issue?

Where are the specifics that you can post to support the things you said I have posted?
That’s right, you can’t produce them.

So we have had
Deflection…. Check
Denial…… check
Lies…… check
Name calling….. check
Ignoring relevant facts…. Check

You are hitting a high % in avoiding the reality of the situation.
How’s Mike Eurzione doing?
 
It was my original post, idiot. The one you took issue with. So entirely "relevant"
To you perhaps

You have yet to address how you went from Staleys ‘might be considered’
To your
‘Probably make the team’
How did you get there?
That’s right, you don’t actually answer questions. You bring up something else. That is generally irrelevant to the subject.
 
Her PLAY drives ratings.

If she is not PLAYING, people will not tune in. And she has not played well against strong defenses, like Team USA encountered in Paris.
She did not play well in the AS game, against the Team USA defense; sure, good assists, and few points.

Will she improve? Absolutely.
Wait, she wasn’t playing very well(to you) when they were 2-9, yet she sold all those jerseys and tickets, etc. even though the always wise and all knowing DT had told us all that she better be ready. Lol.

Do you think ratings would have been the same with her contributing the same as DT?
A simple yes or no would be a great answer.
 
82% increase in American viewers for the Olympics. Women’s basketball viewership down.

Must be a scheduling issue in Hawaii. Way to early to watch
 
Wait, she wasn’t playing very well(to you) when they were 2-9

No; she was not playing above the level of other candidates.
Not sure how many times you need to hear that before it finally sinks in, but here's one more.
 
I'm curious, do people argue with this Joes Troll guy just for their own entertainment? His takes are so absurd you know he's just stirring the pot right? There's no way people can take his views seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tunadog and TJ8869
No; she was not playing above the level of other candidates.
Not sure how many times you need to hear that before it finally sinks in, but here's one more.
Statistically it was close, but she had outplayed at least 3 of them. Two hadn’t even played. You have already admitted that she was just a smidge better than. Enough that you attempted to change the criteria.
 
I'm curious, do people argue with this Joes Troll guy just for their own entertainment? His takes are so absurd you know he's just stirring the pot right? There's no way people can take his views seriously?
Usually his facts are spot on. This thread has been an embarrassing list of bad takes, faulty logic and flat out making stuff up.
And yes it is a bit amusing. It’s usually a challenge to go against him but he is out of his element here.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT