The exocets were fired by the Entendards since the Skyhawks couldn't carry that load. There are videos on those engagements also.I think most of the dogfights were with A-4 skyhawks.
One of the most notable dogfights involving the Sea Harrier took place on June 8, 1982. A pair of RAF Sea Harriers, lead by RAF Flight Lt. David Morgan, engaged four A-4 Skyhawks following up on an attack that had inflicted severe damage on the landing ships HMS Sir Galahad and HMS Sir Tristan.
How the Sea Harrier defeated more superior fighters during the Falklands War
In essence, the ability of the British to take back the Falklands rested on pilots and aircraft fighting while outnumbered six-to-one.www.wearethemighty.com
The Ukrainians can't invade Crimea, but they seem to be determined to make it untenable for Russia to maintain large numbers of effective forces there.
Probably costs someone besides the target money too.I have the same question I asked over a year ago and several times since then: Why are there still sanction targets that haven't been sanctioned?
Were the folks we are sanctioning now all good guys until just recently? Seems unlikely. And if not, why weren't they already under sanction?
Meh. Peasant revolts take awhile to build up, and, it helps that Putin is expending so many resources to keep them compliant for now.It does help explain why the unwashed Russian masses haven't rebelled against this war...which has been predicted repeatedly.
I think it's more a message aimed at Vlad that military support will continue.US-Ukraine 10 Year Mutual Aid Deal just announced. No US troops, but a 10 year commitment to provide materiel, intelligence, training....
Questions:
1. Since it isn't a ratified treaty, Trump could cancel it. Will he?
2. Does this mean we think the war might still be going on in 10 years?
It sends a message to Russia: You're in Deep Doo-Doo for the next decade, Ivan.US-Ukraine 10 Year Mutual Aid Deal just announced. No US troops, but a 10 year commitment to provide materiel, intelligence, training....
Questions:
1. Since it isn't a ratified treaty, Trump could cancel it. Will he?
2. Does this mean we think the war might still be going on in 10 years?
If our security guarantees meant anything, Russia would have never invaded in the first place. In 2014 or 2022.US and Ukraine to sign 10-year security agreement at G7 summit
Joe Biden and Volodymyr Zelenskiy will sign a 10-year bilateral security agreement at the G7 summit in Italy, as arguments continued on the sidelines about how the west can provide a Donald Trump-proof $50bn loan to Ukraine.
Kyiv has signed 15 bilateral security agreements with other countries since the full-scale Russian invasion began in 2022, including with the UK, France, Germany and Italy. The US-Ukraine agreement does not require the authorisation of Congress and could be undone by a future Trump administration. Biden has said previously that guarantees for Ukraine would be equivalent to those to Israel, covering financial and military assistance as well as the possibility of the joint weapons production.
The two leaders will hold a press conference later on Thursday, where differences over a timetable for Ukraine’s bid to join Nato and the introduction of foreign military trainers inside Ukraine are likely to be on view. The bilateral agreements have been seen in Ukraine as a stopgap on the road to joining Nato.
Ukraine will also sign a bilateral deal with Japan on Thursday.
Joe Biden says ‘democracies can deliver’ as G7 agree $50bn Ukraine aid deal
US president hails breakthrough as leaders of the G7 western economies make 10-year agreementwww.theguardian.com
Are you looking at it from Russia's point of view or Ukraine's?Still love all the posts you guys put on here.
I was behind on them....but I started to think what would be happening right now in the United States if we lost over half a million troops for a stalemate. Shit wouldn't fly here
Is it my imagination, or is hardly anyone in America or Europe worried about escalation?
Russia has been blowing smoke for about 75 years. What's different now?Is it my imagination, or is hardly anyone in America or Europe worried about escalation?
So . . . are you agreeing that escalation is nothing worth worrying about?Russia has been blowing smoke for about 75 years. What's different now?
Notwithstanding the use of gentle words like "willingness" and "invite" this sounds very much like a draft. Because at the end, the government will "choose" the people they want to serve.Germany's defense minister is finalizing plans to increase the size of their military and entice more young people into enlisting.
https://apnews.com/article/germany-men-military-service-russia-f00c7c5e3c0db38d7f49f506ebb328c5
"The building of the Sukhoi Design Bureau caught fire in Moscow. SU aircraft are also developed there."
The Baltics aren't willing to test this. Romania won't bet Moldova on this, either.Esculate smesculate. Russia can't even properly supply their own troops. Russia vs. the West???? That is like putting a gerbil in a small cage of wolves.
And the sooner the better.It may sound like I'm an asshole....but I would love to see a picture of Putin hanging like the Italians did to Mussolini.
He is such a clown. The economic unrest may finally be his undoing. A lot of Russian billionaires losing their empires.