Putin’s nuclear threats mean nothing with his US puppet taking over in a few weeksRussian propaganda is upset.
![]()
" Putin:If a mass enemy missile or UAV is launched towards Russia or these weapons enter Russian territory, we will use NUCLEAR weapons.-Elite News"
Putin’s nuclear threats mean nothing with his US puppet taking over in a few weeks
Let the fur fly. Bust a muuve.
What a ridiculous analogy. Who do you work for?I'm trying to imagine how the U.S. would have responded in 1967 if the Soviets gave the North Vietnamese missiles that could strike the U.S.
Would LBJ have started pulling U.S. troops out, or would it have led to war between the US and USSR?
What a ridiculous analogy. Who do you work for?
YGTBFKMWe had troops in Vietnam propping up a puppet government, and bombing the nationalists who were fighting for independence for their whole country. The Soviet Union provided them weapons to be used in that fight, but no weapons with which to strike at the United States.
I work for the Bureau of Child Protection and Special Technology.
I put him back on ignore.YGTBFKM
God bless you for your opposition to an unjust war that happened 60 years ago. Where are you on an unprovoked attack by a tyrant on a peaceful country, with indiscriminate attacks on civilians, including children, taking place now? You work for the Bureau of Child Protection? How ironic.We had troops in Vietnam propping up a puppet government, and bombing the nationalists who were fighting for independence for their whole country. The Soviet Union provided them weapons to be used in that fight, but no weapons with which to strike at the United States.
I work for the Bureau of Child Protection and Special Technology.
God bless you for your opposition to an unjust war that happened 60 years ago. Where are you on an unprovoked attack by a tyrant on a peaceful country, with indiscriminate attacks on civilians, including children, taking place now?
Probably a fair assertion.I'd wager I've had more FBI background checks than everyone here but @alaskanseminole
Quite the stretch. The soviets would have had to given them intercontinental ballistic missiles.I'm trying to imagine how the U.S. would have responded in 1967 if the Soviets gave the North Vietnamese missiles that could strike the U.S.
Would LBJ have started pulling U.S. troops out, or would it have led to war between the US and USSR?
The timing isn’t suspect, it’s overdue. Biden was too cautious. Hopefully Trump isn’t a eunuch to Putin and reversed this. The final straw was the introduction of NK troops, and a gradual raise in US support is harder for Trump to justify with NKs on the ground. Even Fox viewers will get edgy about this development and approve of blowing up some NK soldiersSure would have been nice if this had coincided with Ukraine's spring offensive 8 months ago....
Good news but the timing is a bit suspect.
How long-range missiles striking Russia could affect Ukraine war
![]()
Atacms: What we know about missile system Ukraine could use to strike Russia
The US has never allowed Kyiv to use long-range missiles for attacks inside Russia proper – until now.www.bbc.com
...and after Harris lost he isn't cautious anymore.The timing isn’t suspect, it’s overdue. Biden was too cautious. Hopefully Trump isn’t a eunuch to Putin and reversed this. The final straw was the introduction of NK troops, and a gradual raise in US support is harder for Trump to justify with NKs on the ground. Even Fox viewers will get edgy about this development and approve of blowing up some NK soldiers
Well to begin with, one of your scenarios is happening and other never happened. Secondly, the U.S., to my knowledge, is not currently an occupying invasion force in Cuba. Thirdly, what point do you think you're making?Maybe this is "doom porn," but if we allow Ukraine to fire our missiles deep into Russian territory, how is that different than Russia allowing Cuba to fire Russian-supplied missiles deep into US territory?
Well to begin with, one of your scenarios is happening and other never happened. Secondly, the U.S., to my knowledge, is not currently an occupying invasion force in Cuba. Thirdly, what point do you think you're making?
The alternative is to continue to allow Russia to destroy Ukraine while feeding North Korean troops into a war in Europe. The West has to stand up to Putin's blackmail at some point. I still think we should have given Ukraine what they needed early so Putin would realize we were serious. Instead we are still slow playing sending the good stuff - tanks, aircraft and missiles.I guess my point is that we have become cavalier about the risk of a direct conflict between the two largest nuclear powers.
Literally every time a new sanction like this is announced, I think to myself "Why weren't we doing this already?!"
BRUSSELS, Nov 18 (Reuters) - The European Union has widened its sanctions against Iran over Tehran's support of Russia in its war with Ukraine, the European Commission said on Monday.
The Commission said it had added the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) and its director Mohammad Reza Khiabani, among others, to its sanctions list.
The fresh sanctions are against vessels and ports used for transporting Iranian-made Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), missiles and related technologies and components. They include prohibiting any transaction with ports and locks owned, operated or controlled by the sanctioned individuals and entities.
The Managing Director of Iran's Ports and Maritime Organization Ali Akbar Safaei condemned the fresh sanctions and denied the "European accusations" as "baseless", Iran's official IRNA News Agency reported on Monday.
The EU is also sanctioning three Russian shipping firms - MG Flot, VTS Broker, and Arapax - for transporting Iranian weapons, including drone parts, across the Caspian Sea to resupply Russian troops in Ukraine."
I asked this 18 months ago, at the time we had been there for a year with no plan, again I will ask, almost 3 years in, what is the plan?Quick question as we commit billions in more dollars of aid, while not having a withdrawal plan 1 year in. When we inevitably spend several trillion more dollars to backfill our supplies we are sending over there, that goes on this wars tab also right? We like to explain how this is like the cheapest way ever to take on Russia, while footing the bill for most of the world, I just want to make sure we are all in agreement on that.
I would hope that we would all agree that if they came to us now and said they need x trillion dollars for military spending they would get laughed out of the room. When they do so in 2-3 years under the guise of resupply the money will be spent without much thought.
We need to support Ukraine. We need to have a plan for that side of the world taking over the primary role in what has now become NATOs proxy war with Russia.