Possibly but they could just challenge Ukraine's figures without going into so much detail.They were proving the Ukraine numbers were false. We didn’t lose 15k KIA, just 10k.
Possibly but they could just challenge Ukraine's figures without going into so much detail.They were proving the Ukraine numbers were false. We didn’t lose 15k KIA, just 10k.
LinkThere are more Nazis/white power groups in Russia than all of the former republics combined. Ukrainians actively the Soviets before, during and after WW2, which made it easy for the Russian dominated USSR to label the Ukrainians as Nazi collaborators.
So basically 3 people, of which Putin is one and the other two hand picked by him. If they're on board, or 2/3 of them and the other's family is held at gunpoint, etc., all they have to do is convince those actual service members to do it. Service members who likely have no idea what the real situation is (our leader informed us the American's have launched a first strike! Fire now comrade!!!).It requires Putin, Shoygu, Gerasimov, and the multiple people doing the actual launching from a sub, silo, plane, etc. Oh, and anyone around them with a gun to not shoot anyone of them to stop an insane end of the world moment. So a bunch would be involved.
Here are some links if you are interested. Also note that the crippling sanctions are far closer to a red line in their doctrine (attack that threatens the viability of the Russian state) than a conventional attack on Ukrainian soil.
Actual Russia policy
Short Reuters article
Wikipedia article on the Russian briefcase
So now you’re an expert on the inner workings of the Russian command structure 🤣I'm counting on Putin not actually holding control over the military guys who would be tasked with launching nukes.
Akin to the cluster**** you're currently witnessing on the Russian military hierarchy.
Putin cannot rush into a single room to push "the button". And if he doesn't have the support of his military commanders (which it clearly appears he does not), then he's got no nukes.
So you agree that direct military intervention is not advisable?Sanctions AND military support. We made a clear line at NATO because there was no appetite for responding militarily for a non-NATO country. It resulted in the rallying of pour allies and unprecedented support for Ukraine to fight their own war. Should they be able to stymie Putin it will demonstrate just how weak they are in the world order. Hell, it's doing that already.
The military guys aren't "handpicked" by anyone but themselves. They are oligarch/gangsters like Putin himself, and go back to Soviet times. I see Russia's government as essentially bicameral, with Putin allowed to be the dictator as long as the military, led by Soigu, are happy with his performance.So basically 3 people, of which Putin is one and the other two hand picked by him. If they're on board, or 2/3 of them and the other's family is held at gunpoint, etc., all they have to do is convince those actual service members to do it. Service members who likely have no idea what the real situation is (our leader informed us the American's have launched a first strike! Fire now comrade!!!).
Not sounding great Bob.
I think it is a rather easy choice to let Ukraine have all the various anti-aircraft, rocket artillery and drone systems they want, as well as the Migs if they can sneak them over the border. That's just a slight degree more than what we're already giving them, and would actually be humanitarian as those weapons would enable Ukraine to protect its civilian population from long range and air bombardment.So you agree that direct military intervention is in advisable?
I’m down with that. Give the Ukrainians damn near everything they want….minus direct military involvement.I think it is a rather easy choice to let Ukraine have all the various anti-aircraft, rocket artillery and drone systems they want, as well as the Migs if they can sneak them over the border. That's just a slight degree more than what we're already giving them, and would actually be humanitarian as those weapons would enable Ukraine to protect its civilian population from long range and air bombardment.
I agree that they are handling it well and understand why direct military intervention was not/is not prudent. I trust the people making decisions have far more information than I do to determine if/when it is prudent.So you agree that direct military intervention is not advisable?
Spill the beans, roll the cabbage.There are going to be some rich building supers in Miami.
It's becoming more clear that Zelensky is willing to play a longer "game" and let Russia bleed out in Ukraine and economically.
He has to do what he can with what he has. Sure he would like to end this as soon as possible as his nation is being leveled and thousands more die the longer the war lasts.It's becoming more clear that Zelensky is willing to play a longer "game" and let Russia bleed out in Ukraine and economically.
If I remember correctly, when it came to dealing with the USSR, it was with a Soviet Premiere who answered to the Politburo. Not a one man show like Putin.It is useful to ask oneself WWRD (what would Reagan do?).
Wasn't a big fan of his domestic policies, but he knew how to deal with Russian/Soviet aggression.
He is taking very hard positions on territory and neutrality. Not the talk of a desperate man.He has to do what he can with what he has. Sure he would like to end this as soon as possible as his nation is being leveled and thousands more die the longer the war lasts.
No it’s not…the exact opposite.This is actually an argument FOR American/NATO action.
Well shit. Might as well give him Alaska back then 🙄No it’s not…the exact opposite.
I do agree we’re kind of being held hostage….6,000 nukes give him that ability. It’s the reality of the situation
You keep making this same argument - NO ONE is letting him do whatever he wants, whenever. JFC.“I find it hard to imagine Putin accepting a complete military defeat without him trying to use nuclear weapons first,” Kroenig said. “I think he sees limited nuclear use as more attractive than accepting defeat.”
So what is the solution here then, let him do whatever he wants wherever?
If this analysis is correct, then the US/NATO needs to seriously consider some type of special operation to take him out. You can’t let one man hold the entire goddamn planet hostage because if he loses, he starts using nuclear weapons. This is actually an argument FOR American/NATO action.
They just made all his movies look realistic.LOL. Good luck doing what Skynet and Thulsa Doom couldn’t.
HROT special war correspondent/russkie killer Jimmy McGill.
Necro Mancer has some pretty pithy obituary comments on his TL.Azov in Mariupol with many captured ammunition and destroyed Tigrs with "O" marking. Looks like Russians threw in Mariupol hasher reinforcements from Sumy-Poltava direction
If I don’t see a stolen T-90 flying a Hawkeye flag, I’ll be disappointed.I need a satelite phone to be correspondent. I ddn't want to kill anyone. If I can convince Russkies to surrender, than I will have accomplished something
Not even comparableWell shit. Might as well give him Alaska back then 🙄
If I don’t see a stolen T-90 flying a Hawkeye flag, I’ll be disappointed.
I need a satelite phone to be correspondent. I ddn't want to kill anyone. If I can convince Russkies to surrender, than I will have accomplished something
If I don’t see a stolen T-90 flying a Hawkeye flag, I’ll be disappointed.