ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

Dude

Just stop.
1000_F_83961142_XelS0frICBuzAvxkSRdSsQ5ifzN6rVxE.jpg



Seriously, folks, STOP REPLYING TO TROLLS/MORONS. It only gives them oxygen.
 
I believe you are overthinking this one. The only country this would serve as propaganda is Russia. Wouldn’t change anything in my opinion.
I agree that it would only work in Russia, but that’s the only place it needs to succeed. Putin is telling his people they are running a humanitarian mission in Ukraine, and then they show Lavrov and the president of the IRC shaking hands. It’s a pretty strong optic to support the claim.
 
If the GOP Congress forbade instruction in Spanish by any school in the country, would it be perceived as patriotic, or racist?

You really think people wouldn’t assert that such a law was tantamount to ethnic cleansing and cultural genocide?

I do, as evidence I present the post I quoted.

The obvious aim of such a law is the suppression and eradication of the targeted culture, right? That’s what Putin intends with his Russian language law, and what the Ukrainian language law intends as well.
What about...what about...what about...

It would be seen as racist because it inherently is racist assuming you accept that "Hispanic" is a race. It most certainly is not "ethnic cleansing" or "cultural genocide". That's just dumb.

It is not applicable to what Russia is trying to do in Ukraine. See if you can figure out why? Clue: in which direction is the "invasion"?
 
Criticizing the friggin ICRC is ridiculous....

The hills folks choose to die on in this forum is entertaining...
I’m not criticizing the Red Cross, I’m criticizing the decision. They’re being used.

It’s like how no President would meet with North Korean leadership because they didn’t want to give them the picture.
 
I agree that it would only work in Russia, but that’s the only place it needs to succeed. Putin is telling his people they are running a humanitarian mission in Ukraine, and then they show Lavrov and the president of the IRC shaking hands. It’s a pretty strong optic that supports the claim.
It does nothing of the sort...

They meet with combatant nations to ensure the following...

The legal bases of any action undertaken by the ICRC are as follows:​

  • The four Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I confer on the ICRC a specific mandate to act in the event of international armed conflict. In particular, the ICRC has the right to visit prisoners of war and civilian internees. The Conventions also give the ICRC a broad right of initiative.
It's not an endorsement of Russia's actions...it's to set up the mechanisms to do their mission.
 
  • Like
Reactions: globalhawk
ICRC statement on meeting with the Russians....ie NOT A PHOTO OP.

Mr Maurer plans to speak about the pressing humanitarian issues to be addressed to alleviate suffering of people affected by the conflict in Ukraine.

"The devastation caused by the conflict in recent weeks, as well as eight years of conflict in Donbas, has been vast. There are practical steps guided by international humanitarian law that the parties must take to limit the suffering. I was in Kyiv last week and I'm in Moscow this week to continue the discussion with the authorities on these steps," said Mr Maurer.

Humanitarian issues in places such as Syria or in relation with the consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict are also on the agenda, a continuation of a long-running dialogue.

Mr Maurer plans to meet with representatives of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defense. He will also meet with the chairman of the Russian Red Cross, which is doing significant work providing assistance to those who arrived in Russia after fleeing from their homes in Donbas.

The ICRC is seeking to increase the respect of international humanitarian law and work within its mandate as neutral and impartial intermediary to address humanitarian issues and facilitate dialogue between all sides.

To meet the growing humanitarian needs, the ICRC is massively scaling up its work, including moving in additional assistance and specialists. For the humanitarian response to be more effective, neutral and impartial humanitarian space must be agreed upon and respected so this much-needed assistance reaches those in need.


 
  • Like
Reactions: globalhawk
You're completely ridiculous. Congress CAN'T make a law like that, but states can and HAVE, including my home state of California, and several others.
CA bans any instruction in languages other than English (and I don't mean taking Latin, I mean the opportunity to take a math class taught in Spanish)?
Are you sure about that?

In your example, do you really think Mariuopol should have public schools randomly teaching in the 5-6 languages you listed? That's crazy - societies can't function that way. Everyone that wants to keep speaking Russian or Polish will continue to do so in their own lives and neighborhoods. They'll just also be able to communicate with everyone else in the country as well.
The Florida Dept. of Health publishes materials in English, Spanish and Creole.
Is that crazy?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
You sure about that, Clark?
That appears to be what Slappy thinks. That's why I was asking the clarifying question.
I don't believe he is correct.

You're completely ridiculous. Congress CAN'T make a law like that, but states can and HAVE, including my home state of California, and several others. And it's not "cultural genocide," that's absurd. People can still speak and learn whatever language at home. Teaching only a single national language at schools just ensures all students will be able to succeed by having a shared language and by knowing the language in which the government operates.
 
That's the major problem. Even if Ukraine manages to push the army completely out of Ukraine, Russia can simply shell them into submission. If he's going to take the route of just leveling the country and calling it a day he doesn't need the army there to do that. He can just fire missiles from inside Russia and off of Ships.
Russia will run out of missiles at some point. They maybe be dipping into older stock currently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
That appears to be what Slappy thinks. That's why I was asking the clarifying question.
I don't believe he is correct.
Sorry...misread it. They did ban it for "all intensive purposes". It was very difficult to get bilingual instruction in CA for years until the voters overturned it. Many (most?) schools dropped it rather than deal with the hassle. But - no - there was never an absolute ban.
 
Quit moving the lines. You stated that US was more violent in civilian deaths than Japan. Japan even sent over balloon bombs that hit NW US. Do you realize what they did to Chinese, Korea, Philippine civilians. You need an education.

"But they didn't do it to us, so since it didn't happen to us, it didn't happen to anyone"
 
"But they didn't do it to us, so since it didn't happen to us, it didn't happen to anyone"
Dude. I am not talking about what Japan did to its neighbors. I am talking about what Japan did to us and what we did to Japan.
What is wrong with all of you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT