ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

Interesting. What was proposed in the podcast was that many countries were starting to complain about the inability to receive fertilizer from Russia. Brazil being one of them. Perhaps it is exempt, but it's still hard to ship?
That might be a container issue as a lot of the shipping companies won’t deal with Russia now.
 
A Democrat from the 1930's would be a conservative today.

No

And even if this were true, what does this make the current GOP, which has moved even further to the right?

Yep: fascists and Nazis (apparently), because those are the rallies you always see those flags being displayed prominently...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: IACub
I follow a subscription service that is doing data analytics on the war. They estimate ukraine has lost over 90% of their tanks and aircraft.

over 18,000 Russian soldiers dead. 3700 civilians dead. And 4.2 milllion refugees (left the country).
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
Interesting read on the WHY of Russian war crimes:

Some have attempted to argue that Russian culture is somehow to blame for the crimes Russia’s military has committed, and although this is inaccurate and perhaps even bigoted, it is fair to say that Russia’s military culture and organization is to blame for the crimes in Ukraine—and for the fact that Russia’s military seems to commit similar crimes in every conflict it fights.

 
Gee, sounds a lot like a certain poster's repetitive talking points in this very thread, doesn't it?

Practically, this means that Stand Together supports unilaterally abandoning nearly all of the economic sanctions imposed on Russia since the invasion of Crimea in 2014. Anything else, Caldwell argues, risks escalation "into a larger conflict between a nuclear-armed Russia and the United States."
 
  • Wow
Reactions: naturalbornhawk



seinfeld-thats-a-shame2.gif
 
Gee, sounds a lot like a certain poster's repetitive talking points in this very thread, doesn't it?

Practically, this means that Stand Together supports unilaterally abandoning nearly all of the economic sanctions imposed on Russia since the invasion of Crimea in 2014. Anything else, Caldwell argues, risks escalation "into a larger conflict between a nuclear-armed Russia and the United States."

"Buy my stuff, or I'll nuke you"

And some find this to be a persuasive marketing campaign....
 
Wonder if this is a defensive flare malfunction-looks like they all came out at once.

 
I follow a subscription service that is doing data analytics on the war. They estimate ukraine has lost over 90% of their tanks and aircraft.

over 18,000 Russian soldiers dead. 3700 civilians dead. And 4.2 milllion refugees (left the country).
We have been intentionally not reporting Ukraine's losses. I am curious as to how many planes/tanks they started with (It can't be near the numbers that Russia has had). So every loss of there's has had to have been bigger. I do know that they've essentially only had a few aircraft left for any air support. I really really wish we'd provide them with some more offensive armaments. I'm not worried about Russia escalating to nuclear if we give them more weapons, honestly I'm not even worried about them escalating if we come in and provide air support at lest over western Ukraine. The only place I see it being a concern is if we actually strike in Russia. I'm not even certain they'd get that upset if we attacked their troops in Ukraine. I think their redline would be Russia itself.
 
Excellent essay:

FTA:

The suffering and devastation in Ukraine is far from over as Mr Putin's strategic aims have not changed. Negotiations at gunpoint offer no magic formula for avoiding another war and peace at any price does not mean that atrocities will end. Here I am speaking from the experience of my own country. For Estonia and many others after the second world war, peace meant the beginning of the Soviet occupation with its huge human cost. It brought renewed suffering through mass killings, repressions, mass deportations and other crimes against humanity.

Estonia’s experience reminds us that our first focus today must be on how to help Ukraine free itself from occupying forces, restore its territorial integrity and stop Russian aggression. I cannot help but admire the brave fight Volodymyr Zelensky is leading and the extremely difficult choices he faces.

The past three of Mr Putin’s wars illustrate why he must not win this one and why Moscow cannot be allowed to pretend that it has gained anything in the process. We have let Mr Putin get away with this aggression several times before. We can’t let him get away with it again now. Were that to happen, his appetite would only grow, and more atrocities and more human suffering would follow.

The Ukrainian crisis has made it once again crystal-clear why countries in central and eastern Europe, after breaking free from Soviet occupation, quickly asked to join NATO. The alliance doesn’t exist to threaten Russia: it is for defence. It exists to keep tens of millions from being enslaved and slaughtered by dictators. And it is the actions of the Soviet Union, and later Russia, that explain why so many countries wanted to join NATO. Those blaming it for “expansion” and “escalation” succumb to the very imperial ideology and language pursued by the Kremlin. These run counter to the principles of state sovereignty and democracy.

 
We have made it clear on how we’d respond to an attack on a NATO member.

We made it clear before Russia attacked Ukraine we wouldn’t respond militarily.


It’s as simple as that.
Except it’s a policy that is enforced by the person in the Oval Office. And Putin knows that. Hell, 3 years from now the US may not even be a NATO member.
 
Last edited:
I follow a subscription service that is doing data analytics on the war. They estimate ukraine has lost over 90% of their tanks and aircraft.

over 18,000 Russian soldiers dead. 3700 civilians dead. And 4.2 milllion refugees (left the country).
Just goes to show that anti-tank warfare doesn’t have to have tanks to be successful. And Ukraine is getting more tanks anyway.

And when is the last time we’ve seen more combatants than civilians dying in a war? Certainly not since WW1.
 
I don't really know much about him but from what I've gathered online, many say he was a far right leader who even far right people in Russia didn't take seriously. Sort of the over the top idiot saying idiotic things to make Putin and other seem reasonable. He was allowed to function in this capacity because he served the role of saying outlandish things well.
That makes no sense whatsoever.

Signed,
Bobert
Gaetz
Greene
Graham
Johnson
And a bunch of HROT rooskie lovers
 
The question is WHERE do you have to import the fuel rods from?

Until we can get going with renewables completely, Nuclear provides for a good stop gap source.
No idea where the rods are made but most uranium is mined from Kazakhstan. With Canada and Australia also producing quite a bit from what I remember. Pretty sure Colorado has quite a bit, but not sure how active the mining is for it.
 
No idea where the rods are made but most uranium is mined from Kazakhstan. With Canada and Australia also producing quite a bit from what I remember. Pretty sure Colorado has quite a bit, but not sure how active the mining is for it.

Granted I don't know too much about Kazakhstan but the rest of those countries don't sound too dangerous.

I'd rather be dependent upon Canada and Australia for my energy needs than Russia, the middle east, and China.
 
Scholz is a pretty left wing dude. And to be left wing in Germany makes our left wing look reactionary. Doesn’t surprise me at all.

Ideology doesn't matter much when you are on Putin's payroll. That was a problem with his two most recent predecessors and I suspect what is driving some of his recent decisions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT