Right, that was my point.The answer to your NATO question changes the equation that leads to your other questions. Sarkozy (soon headed to prison for crimes related to taking Russian money) and Merkel (one of Russia's favorite business partners) blocked Ukraine from joining NATO back in 2008. Had UKR been a member of NATO for the past 12 or 13 years, there would have been no invasion in 2014 or 2022 and we would't be talking about sending weapons sooner.
I have read there are special operators present in Ukraine including Brits and I think US, playing point guard making sure the incoming weapons get distributed out to where they should be. If not, they are surely next door in Poland doing something similar.So far it appears pretty much all the western weapons delivered have made it to the front and it appears money pouring in is going to the war effort not grifters, so perhaps it’s right for the previous story to be revised.
How many of those “corruption” stories were actually pro-Russian disinformation and propaganda? One has to wonder in retrospect.
FiFYI think it’s exceptionally difficult to navigate when both sides are engaged in deception campaigns. However,It just appears thatthe Russians are more evil than we could have imagined in the 1980s and they are toomay be a bit less sophisticatedunsophisticated in their methods to fool the world into thinking otherwise.
Just an excuse by the no escalation crowd to slow down weapons deliveries to Ukraine.
Whatever doesn't fit your world view must be Russian propaganda. Aren't Russians the reason Hillary lost to?How many of those “corruption” stories were actually pro-Russian disinformation and propaganda? One has to wonder in retrospect.
Questioning whether there was Russian propaganda to grease the skids for, and to cover up, its incremental chomping away at Ukraine is hardly grist for an argument that whatever doesn't fit one's world view must be Russian propaganda.Whatever doesn't fit your world view must be Russian propaganda. Aren't Russians the reason Hillary lost to?
No but it's a constant theme for some. Earlier another poster was trying to imply Russian bots are moving the Ukraine story to the 2nd page of the news.Questioning whether there was Russian propaganda to grease the skids for, and to cover up, its incremental chomping away at Ukraine is hardly grist for an argument that whatever doesn't fit one's world view must be Russian propaganda.
I might have missed that in the previous 29,450 posts, but that is relevant to what I just posted (Russia trying to make its life easier while being a bad actor), even if not true. It is not relevant to an argument that whatever doesn't fit one's world view must be Russian propaganda.No but it's a constant theme for some. Earlier another poster was trying to imply Russian bots are moving the Ukraine story to the 2nd page of the news.
You are aware that every western democracy on the globe has been an active target of Russian propaganda and disinformation campaigns for decades, right? Or are you just insanely naive?Whatever doesn't fit your world view must be Russian propaganda. Aren't Russians the reason Hillary lost to?
Why are you so concerned about the victim hood of Russia? The "NATOs fault" shtick got played out when Putin showed his hand, so is this your new crusade?Whatever doesn't fit your world view must be Russian propaganda. Aren't Russians the reason Hillary lost to?
It appears to already be impacting Russia's ability to hit Ukrainian targets:Is the ammunition dump hits going to make a significant difference in the war? This has been a logistical war throughout that Ukraine has been fighting, which they are winning handily on that front, will this be another game changer or just a nuisance to Russia?
I think what is happening as exemplified by the surgical strikes on ammo dumps and military commands and barracks from just a handful of the new HIMARS can in fact turn war IF we send a bunch more. Russia is for sure rattled.Is the ammunition dump hits going to make a significant difference in the war? This has been a logistical war throughout that Ukraine has been fighting, which they are winning handily on that front, will this be another game changer or just a nuisance to Russia?
paywall for us poorsMore on the impact of the HIMARs and other high-tech guns:
Ukraine Strike on Russian Air-Defense Unit Shows Impact of New Weapons From West
Ukrainian forces struck an air-defense system in Russian-occupied territory in the east of the country, in the latest sign of how long-range artillery sent by the West is shifting the war’s calculus.www.wsj.com
Try this link:paywall for us poors
Will Merica try and take back Alaska, as well?I am eager for the day when Ukraine starts making gains against Russia and pushing them back out. Hopefully, they can retake Crimea as well.
Correct... and among them are Republican Senators Johnson and Hawley.Just an excuse by the no escalation crowd to slow down weapons deliveries to Ukraine.
That’s because Sarkozy and Merkel understood that would have meant a Russian invasion in 2008.The answer to your NATO question changes the equation that leads to your other questions. Sarkozy (soon headed to prison for crimes related to taking Russian money) and Merkel (one of Russia's favorite business partners) blocked Ukraine from joining NATO back in 2008. Had UKR been a member of NATO for the past 12 or 13 years, there would have been no invasion in 2014 or 2022 and we would't be talking about sending weapons sooner.
It's more complicated than just Nato, but Nato would be enough. The neocons in Washington are influential, especially on Ukraine, and they know this.That’s because Sarkozy and Merkel understood that would have meant a Russian invasion in 2008.
Neocons get back in the White House on 2021. Within months they’re making public statements about Ukraine joining NATO and Russia makes statements about what they’ll do in response.
If you wanted a proxy war with Russia, is there a better method than the one pursued by the White House since 2021?
Any western company still operating in Russia deserves whatever they get.
No surprise, amirite?
I am not a business person so I wonder how all of this is going to turn out. I hope it hurts Russia at some point.No surprise, amirite?
Imagine being some Russian private based at an ammo dump in eastern Ukraine right now.Live look in at Russian positions in Eastern Ukraine
Huh, and here I thought we should take Putin and his talking heads at their word that this was about Russia taking back what Russia thinks is Russia's.It's more complicated than just Nato, but Nato would be enough. The neocons in Washington are influential, especially on Ukraine, and they know this.
"Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian elite (not just Putin). In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players, from knuckle-draggers in the dark recesses of the Kremlin to Putin’s sharpest liberal critics, I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.”
—Memo from William Burns, US ambassador to Moscow to US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, April 2008, days after NATO announced that it would admit Ukraine as a member
Inevitability of Ukraine war and the dubious role played by Western leaders
The US and the West have brought this war on us, and the whole world is suffering with no end in sightwww.firstpost.com
Do you think the neocons assumed he was bluffing about Ukraine membership in NATO being a ‘red line’, or did they intend to provoke the previously declared (and broadly understood) response?Huh, and here I thought we should take Putin and his talking heads at their word that this was about Russia taking back what Russia thinks is Russia's.