Love it. Every bullet, shell, round, etc blown up is one that cannot be used to kill children and commit war crimes. Light 'em up.
Love it. Every bullet, shell, round, etc blown up is one that cannot be used to kill children and commit war crimes. Light 'em up.
Is what he said untrue?This poster is a bad agent. Russky. Ban his skit.
hwk23 is no bueno.
The ‘new report’ is citing the reports from the former Ukrainian human rights ombudsman (Denisova) that was sacked by their parliament for spreading disinformation about rapes. This is recycling a discredited report as a new report by simply repeating it:Horrific new OSCE report on the atrocities by Russian soldiers in Ukraine, including 25 girls aged 14-24 were kept in a basement in Bucha and gang-raped by Russian troops
The precision of these weapons is amazing. Look at this post-strike ammo dump:CNN story about the introduction of HIMARS and M777 systems, with more on the way. It's an in general piece, but worth a read. It gives insight into how the Ukrainians are using them mostly at night, which might be to keep them from being victims of counter fire, but might also be a bit of psychology. I think they want to show the Russians they own the night. There is also good insight about how the Russian army is very dependent on manpower to move and disperse munitions, and the clustering of munitions by the Russians has been a failure. Is that by doctrine, or the inability to move and disperse?
It has been impressive how the Ukrainians are using the new weapons in such a controlled fashion. Hitting command centers, and logistical hubs.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/europe/ukraine-western-weapons-russia-front-lines-intl-cmd/index.html
The bottom one is just spectacular with what must be rockets and missiles flying out. Hope they did even more damage on the Russians.Love it. Every bullet, shell, round, etc blown up is one that cannot be used to kill children and commit war crimes. Light 'em up.
Good to know this story was not true.The ‘new report’ is citing the reports from the former Ukrainian human rights ombudsman (Denisova) that was sacked by their parliament for spreading disinformation about rapes. This is recycling a discredited report as a new report by simply repeating it:
The report also highlights a report by Commissioner for Human Rights Denisova that 25 girls aged 14 to 24 were kept in a basement in Bucha and gang-raped by Russian troops, resulting in nine becoming pregnant
I think they were correct to be cautious at the outset.So you disagree with the administration’s handling of the situation?
I don’t know about all the way to Moscow, but we clearly need to up the abilities for Ukraine to strike 150-200 miles. We need to allow Ukraine to hit the bridge into Crimea. And, we need to make sure they have enough firepower to send a message to Lukashenko in Belarus. If your troops come across the border we blow up stuff in your country.This is why I want Ukraine to have the ATACMS that can reach Moscow. Russia is getting away with Genocide. Is there ever going to be a time to hold Putin accountable....not until he is dead. There is no way he is going to allow himself to be tried and punished.
If striking Russia forces them to go to extremes and forcing NATO to get in the war, I am for it. I served once, I would do it again.
I don’t know about all the way to Moscow, but we clearly need to up the abilities for Ukraine to strike 150-200 miles. We need to allow Ukraine to hit the bridge into Crimea. And, we need to make sure they have enough firepower to send a message to Lukashenko in Belarus. If your troops come across the border we blow up stuff in your country.
Ukraine today again repeated that they would not send the HIMARS into Russia. Too bad the West makes them fight with their hands tied.I don’t know about all the way to Moscow, but we clearly need to up the abilities for Ukraine to strike 150-200 miles. We need to allow Ukraine to hit the bridge into Crimea. And, we need to make sure they have enough firepower to send a message to Lukashenko in Belarus. If your troops come across the border we blow up stuff in your country.
I agree with everything you posted minus giving them the ability to strike deep into Russia....by deep I mean Moscow deep. Interdicting Russia's supply chains ect close to the border is fair game.I think they were correct to be cautious at the outset.
This far into the conflict, however, it is clear Russia saber-rattling is simply a bluff.
I don't want NATO troops, but I am 100% in favor of giving the Ukrainians even more and even better weapon platforms, including ones that can strike Russians in Russian territory. And definitely it is LONG past-due to supply fighter jets and bombers.
So yeah, currently, I think the administration remains on a too-cautious footing --- it is time to fully arm Ukraine as if it were already a NATO member, IMO.
I guess I can't understand the thinking that its OK for Russia to target Kyiv and every other major Ukrainian city, but Ukraine should be restrained from hitting Russian cities. It's a war -- in WWII, the Allies bombed the shit out of Berlin and Tokyo. Hit them where it hurts.I agree with everything you posted minus giving them the ability to strike deep into Russia....by deep I mean Moscow deep. Interdicting Russia's supply chains ect close to the border is fair game.
It's not ok to do that.I guess I can't understand the thinking that its OK for Russia to target Kyiv and every other major Ukrainian city, but Ukraine should be restrained from hitting Russian cities. It's a war -- in WWII, the Allies bombed the shit out of Berlin and Tokyo. Hit them where it hurts.
Yup, which is why I said in my opinion.It's not ok to do that.
We give Ukraine the ability to rain missiles on the Kremlin that's pretty escalatory. That's regime change escalatory and Putin and crew will do what they need to do to put a stop to it.
How can they put a stop to it minus total withdrawal from Ukraine...which isn't in the cards IMO.
Obviously can't do it conventionally.
Maybe they decide it's time to launch a Nuke at a Ukrainian city and say "stop" or we continue.
What's the NATO/US response to that?
Russia still has that Trump card...just because they haven't played it doesn't mean they never will.
(I'd also add we're not privy to all the communications between Russia and the US......maybe this has been discussed. You do this....we do this. Who knows...)
Torbee, I know you are just copy pasting so this isn't directed at you. I'm just helping clarify for others.The precision of these weapons is amazing. Look at this post-strike ammo dump:
Another Russian reporter, Roman Sapenkov, said he witnessed the strike at the weekend on the Russian base at Kherson’s airport.
“I was struck by the fact that the whole packet, five or six rockets, landed practically on a penny. Usually MLRS lands in a wide area, and at maximum range they scatter like a fan,” he wrote, referring to multiple launch rocket systems that are less advanced than HIMARS or the M777.
I think if Belarus comes in to this by attacking Ukraine it’s the trigger for all out war. I think a 1 v 1 battle the Europeans are good with standing by and just providing weapons and support. Kind of like a bar fight, two guys going at it and others will just watch, someone else jumping in and making it two on one, bystanders won’t view that as fair and will jump in to help the lone guy(as long as he is not an assh@le😀)
Incendiary rounds use against troops is illegal. It's basically burning soldiers to death. In the army we used to fire both incendiary and regular impact rounds together and call it "shake and bake." That has since been outlawed.
So if Ukraine has 15 MLRS and the 12 HIMARS, the situation is a little better than what many of us thought it seems. (Wish they would give them more of the 360 HIMARS the US has.)Torbee, I know you are just copy pasting so this isn't directed at you. I'm just helping clarify for others.
Roman Sapenkov is partially correct. HIMARS isn't more accurate than MLRS. The systems are essentially the same. It's their transportation platform that makes them different. HIMARS is a truck mounted rocket system. MLRS is a track mounted system. Both systems traditionally fire 6 x rockets that contain hundreds of bomblets inside each one. They "detonate" in the air over a target area dispersing bomblets all over. MLRS/HIMARS rockets can also fire 6 x GMLRS (Guided munitions) that have a single warhead. Both HIMARS and MLRS can also fire ATACMS.
M777 is just a Cannon that is lighter than traditional 155mm artillery allowing it to be more easily flown into area via helicopter. The M777 (towed) and M109A6 (self propelled) both fire the same 155mm rounds including the guided Excalibur rounds.
M777 and M109A6 with Excalibur
I can’t wait to see what they do with the UK version. Apparently their version is even deadlier.So if Ukraine has 15 MLRS and the 12 HIMARS, the situation is a little better than what many of us thought it seems. (Wish they would give them more of the 360 HIMARS the US has.)
It can load and fire 12 missiles vs. 6 for HIMARS. Both can use the same array of missiles. M270 is tracked. HIMARS is on wheels.I can’t wait to see what they do with the UK version. Apparently their version is even deadlier.
I believe the US has 400+ HIMARS.So if Ukraine has 15 MLRS and the 12 HIMARS, the situation is a little better than what many of us thought it seems. (Wish they would give them more of the 360 HIMARS the US has.)