Marketing is suggesting they switch to paddle boards.Me thinks OceanGate Expeditions is going to be offering some deep discounts soon.
May have to think about it.
So would these people have just been crushed in a massive implosion?
Scorpion imploded in 1968.The United States Navy lost sixteen submarines before it established SUBSAFE in 1963. Since then, they haven't lost any. There are things in life that you can cut corners on or go into with uncertainty. Deep sea submarines absolutely are not one of these things.
Me thinks OceanGate Expeditions is going to be offering some deep discounts soon.
May have to think about it.
I wonder if an ex-employee would put this job on their resume?Nope. Headed straight to Chapter 7. Liquidation.
Might as well have the filing ready.
My thoughts exactly.At least this guy payed the ultimate price for his hubris and corner cutting.
So many others don't. They let other people pay the ultimate price for their corner cutting.
It leaves chunks. There was a reddit thread yesterday with photos from a explosive decompression. I'm not happy I saw the results.That’s what I’m wondering….I feel like 6,000 PSI wouldn’t leave much left? Unless it somehow equalizes before it goes “poof”.
Any science experts out there?
nopeNot to sound all morbid....but would there even bodies to recover at that depth and pressure?
It had already went to the titanic and back three times prior to this expedition.I'm no engineer, but I'm aware that properly designed machines or machine parts come with safety factors. Wire cable, slings, shackles, pins, bolts, etc. used for cranes are a good example. They all come tagged with a stated capacity. This capacity is well under what they're actually capable of handling. Safety is thus factored in. The Titan was designed to be able to go down 13,000 feet to the Titanic. Yet, it failed to do this. Structurally failed. I don't see how it's possible to see this accident as anything other than foolish trust placed on an improper design.
That doesn't mean the design wasn't faulty or that it was properly maintained.It had already went to the titanic and back three times prior to this expedition.
Sure, but they said it failed to do it, which it successfully did 3 times.That doesn't mean the design wasn't faulty or that it was properly maintained.
If you want to parse words, he said it failed to go down 13,000 feet to the Titanic, not that it failed to go down 13,000 feet to the Titanic every time. I read his post to express the thought that such an apparatus should have a robust design capable of its intended repeated use, and that parts with an expired anticipated useful life would be replaced. It would appear that in this case, the hull needed to replaced because the carbon fibers were weakened and ruptured. You don't get to bat 750 with submarine hulls.Sure, but they said it failed to do it, which it successfully did 3 times.
Not to sound all morbid....but would there even bodies to recover at that depth and pressure?
It had already went to the titanic and back three times prior to this expedition.
Stating the obvious, but there needs to be an investigation into the silencing of the whistleblowers, and its previously reported problems which were not publicly disclosed or apparently vetted.I get that, but going to the Titanic shouldn't have been anything extraordinary for the Titan had it been designed properly. The implosion proves that no safety factor existed for it whatsoever. It failed within its stated specs! That's something that can't ever happen. And doesn't with proper engineering.
The Titan was designed to be able to go down 13,000 feet to the Titanic.
Yes, if the merry-go-round was located under a 6,000 pound anvil with a loose bolt holding it above...So a billionaire’s able to fork over $250k for this. Would that be like most of us paying a few bucks to let our kids ride the merry-go-round at the county fair?
I experience an explosive decompression every Thursday morning after "wings Wednesday."It leaves chunks. There was a reddit thread yesterday with photos from a explosive decompression. I'm not happy I saw the results.
I heard that they only did the initial stress test where it applied that level of pressure to the vessel for an extended period of time and it did pass. However, as you mentioned, they did not do any testing for repeated exposures. Since carbon fiber had never been used to build this kind of vessel, there was no real world indicator of how many repeated exposures it could handle. Well, now we know.Yet, it may not have been engineered to undergo cyclic stresses to that level.
Cyclic testing is a thing
NDE is a thing.
Did they do either with their "composite vessel"?
If I inherited $1B you know what I’d do?My version of heaven has the billionaires who inherited their wealth explaining that this what they did with it.
I heard that they only did the initial stress test where it applied that level of pressure to the vessel for an extended period of time and it did pass. However, as you mentioned, they did not do any testing for repeated exposures. Since carbon fiber had never been used to build this kind of vessel, there was no real world indicator of how many repeated exposures it could handle. Well, now we know.
Yet, it may not have been engineered to undergo cyclic stresses to that level.
Cyclic testing is a thing
NDE is a thing.
Did they do either with their "composite vessel"?
I fear we’ll never know now what was making those tapping sounds.
It’s like waiting your whole damn life to take that underwater journey, and while the sub implodes you think “well isn’t this nice”, isn’t it ironic, don’t ya think?Big oof if true
Director, Rapid Unscheduled DissemblyI wonder if an ex-employee would put this job on their resume?
Chief engineer on the Oceangate sub that imploded.
Dress up the job description a little better than I did of course
I’d extend that to even billionaires who earned their wealth.My version of heaven has the billionaires who inherited their wealth explaining that this what they did with it.