ADVERTISEMENT

True or False: The polls are wrong and Kamala is going to win in a landslide

Trump sold out Madison Square gardens in under 3 hours. He may win new york lol
 
Maybe if you read the news once in awhile you wouldn't be so ignorant.

Weird. A jury marked that he didn't rape her and then a judge offered his nonlegal personal opinion.

By the way a civil finding is not a conviction. You know that right? I guess with all that news reading you are doing you may not have made that distinction. Especially as you and the lowlife scum that pretend to be journalists now are nothing more than mouthpiece for a political party.
 
Go for it Gus...guarantee this loser won't take you up on your challenge....if he does by a miracle, make sure you see the money first....
Oh Im good for it and would love for him to accept. @Huey Grey? deal? Or name your bet. I am very confident that a ban is not in the cards.
 
Would like to revisit this thread after the election. Go on record.

Personally, I believe the polls have it close but can’t account for voter turnout and enthusiasm (something that happened in 2016). I will go on record saying Kamala wins a nail biter because of women turning out due to the abortion issue.




Michael Moore was right in 2016. Will he be right again?


I think the public decides not to vote for two piss poor presidential candidates and the government is left with their pants down trying to figure out how to resolve this clusterf*** failure of an election.

And I will laugh with appreciation at the high entertainment value.
 
I think the public decides not to vote for two piss poor presidential candidates and the government is left with their pants down trying to figure out how to resolve this clusterf*** failure of an election.

And I will laugh with appreciation at the high entertainment value.
That’s a false equivalency.

Kamala is not a strong candidate, but she is the only adult in the race. Thinking like yours is how America ****ed up in 2016.

A second Trump presidency would be 100 x worse and quite possibly cause irreversible damage.
 
That’s a false equivalency.

Kamala is not a strong candidate, but she is the only adult in the race. Thinking like yours is how America ****ed up in 2016.

A second Trump presidency would be 100 x worse and quite possibly cause irreversible damage.
She's a very strong candidate. The strongest we've seen since Obama.
 
She has raised the most money ever, has the largest volunteer base ever, fills up arenae everywhere she goes, and has every endorsement you could imagine. She is incredibly strong.
+1 for arenae.

Actually, setting aside the infrastructure you describe, which sort of comes with parties these days, I'd describe her as an average to above-average candidate (say, 6.5 on a scale of 10). Both her strength and her weakness are two sides of the same coin. On the strength side, she has obviously been very (and surprisingly) disciplined in following her advisors' advice to limit non-scripted communications until it became appropriate and/or necessary not to, given her opponent and the obvious goodwill that initially followed from being neither Trump nor Biden. The weakness has been that, as more communication has become necessary/appropriate, it's been somewhat disorganized and just as pandering as his has. Some of that is a function of not having had to run a primary.
 
Last edited:
Weird. A jury marked that he didn't rape her and then a judge offered his nonlegal personal opinion.

By the way a civil finding is not a conviction. You know that right? I guess with all that news reading you are doing you may not have made that distinction. Especially as you and the lowlife scum that pretend to be journalists now are nothing more than mouthpiece for a political party.
You're voting for a rapist.

You are scum.

Live with it.
 
+1 for arenae.

Actually, setting aside the infrastructure you describe, which sort of comes with parties these days, I'd describe her as an average to above-average candidate (say, 6.5 on a scale of 10). Both her strength and her weakness are two sides of the same coin. On the strength side, she has obviously been very (and surprisingly) disciplined in following her advisors' advice to limit non-scripted communications until it became appropriate and/or necessary not to, given her opponent and the obvious goodwill that initially followed from being neither Trump nor Biden. The weakness has been that, as more communication has become necessary/appropriate, it's been somewhat disorganized and just as pandering as his has. Some of that is a function of not having had to run a primary.
How is setting records average? In no world is setting records average. And how is her campaign disorganized? That sounds like complete nonsense. Her campaign has been nearly flawless.
 
How is setting records average? In no world is setting records average. And how is her campaign disorganized? That sounds like complete nonsense. Her campaign has been nearly flawless.
Honestly, arena events are largely astroturf these days and so don't do much for me as a general rule.

I did not say her campaign was disorganized - indeed, if anything I think I suggested the opposite in noting its strong discipline. I said her messaging, once it eventually started to be pushed out, has been somewhat disorganized on substantive issues and themes. Now don't get me wrong, i'm sure everything's been microtested to appeal to particular audiences her pollsters are targeting, but the focus seems to be a bit lacking. One day she's selling hope, the next fear, etc. The better approach -- usually refined through a primary - is to identify and stick with your themes.
 
How is setting records average? In no world is setting records average. And how is her campaign disorganized? That sounds like complete nonsense. Her campaign has been nearly flawless.
"Her campaign has been nearly flawless......"


jim-face.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminole97
I think there will be a big crossover this election with lots of moderate Rs voting for her. Indies will heavily break for her. Trump has whittled his possible voters down to die hard MAGAs. That's really poor strategy. His ceiling is 48. But he will probably get closer to 44-45. That will be a route against Harris getting 50.
He's really focusing on the young male demo that worships Elon & Tate. Granted, failing strategy as that demo doesn't vote.

Not a Reagan landslide but I think we'll know who wins by Wednesday night or Thursday morning unlike 2020. Kamala wins.
 
Honestly, arena events are largely astroturf these days and so don't do much for me as a general rule.

I did not say her campaign was disorganized - indeed, if anything I think I suggested the opposite in noting its strong discipline. I said her messaging, once it eventually started to be pushed out, has been somewhat disorganized on substantive issues and themes. Now don't get me wrong, i'm sure everything's been microtested to appeal to particular audiences her pollsters are targeting, but the focus seems to be a bit lacking. One day she's selling hope, the next fear, etc. The better approach -- usually refined through a primary - is to identify and stick with your themes.
Huey,

stumbled onto this at lunch by coincidence. This is "sort of" what I'm getting at:

 
She has raised the most money ever, has the largest volunteer base ever, fills up arenae everywhere she goes, and has every endorsement you could imagine. She is incredibly strong.
Are you talking about a popularity contest or Caitlin Clark? Wait, what thread am I in?.........
 
Harris wins by a razor thin electoral-state margin although she wins by 7 million in the popular vote. Sadly, it's an election that shouldn't be that close. The fact that nearly half of the voting public would vote for a convicted felon and one who attempted to overturn the results of an election speaks volumes for how really dumb half the US electorate is.
 
Harris will win, but expect at least 3-5 days before it's confirmed.
Some States don't count mail in and absentee ballots until polls are closed Tuesday evening.
 
Harris wins by a razor thin electoral-state margin although she wins by 7 million in the popular vote. Sadly, it's an election that shouldn't be that close. The fact that nearly half of the voting public would vote for a convicted felon and one who attempted to overturn the results of an election speaks volumes for how really dumb half the US electorate is.
Trump being forced to campaign in North Carolina and Harris going on the offense in Texas suggests to me that this this is breaking towards Harris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindemann
The media that has sold its soul to the devil all of a sudden has a conscience and wants to report the truth. Right. How bout' some peanut brittle.
 
I agree 100% with this.

IMO, it is literally a coin toss.

If Kamala had a wider appeal, she would win in a landslide. If Trump weren’t such a lunatic, he would win in a landslide due to 2/3 of the focal issues for this election being perceived as advantages for him (illegal immigration and economic insecurity). Kamala has the abortion ban backlash on her side.

Tbh, if I could trust Trump’s judgment and decision-making, I would probably vote for Trump. The problem is he can’t be trusted and his physical and cognitive decline are on pace to exceed Biden’s. Couple that with all of Trump’s personality issues and emotional instability, there is just no way he is fit to be commander in chief. His first presidency was an absolute shit show. A second Trump presidency would be 10 x worse.

America doesn’t need it.
I can understand one's utter disdain for everything Trump...but the bolded portion is just made up.
 
That’s a false equivalency.
I can understand why you'd think that. But the problem with your thinking is that they are both bad for DIFFERENT reasons. Trust me. I sit on a 20,000 foot Ivory Tower looking down at humanity and laughing at your failures. I do this for a living. I'm a friggin' evil monkey.......
Kamala is not a strong candidate, (Correct.) but she is the only adult in the race. (Adults are a big part of the problem with this country though.....notice the plural, as in more than the number of fingers and toes we normally possess......................so being an adult doesn't convince me that she'll make the best possible choice in a nation of 330 million people to be our President. And you all need to stop thinking about it like it's a comparison between her and Trump. I'm pointing out the flaws in each because they both don't deserve to be President and you all need to pick someone else even though you won't, which is why you all will be blamed and held responsible starting in November, but alas I've said too much. :D)

(P.S. I don't need to point out Trump's faults because they are inherent and we've had years and decades to see why he is not someone who should be President of the U.S. It's just other people's fault for being conditioned/triggered into assuming that if someone only talks about one candidate's faults, then that must mean they're doing it because they want the other candidate to win.................that's a big part of the f***ing problem with the public's obsession with political discourse.)

Thinking like yours is how America ****ed up in 2016. (Well, we can rehash that if you want. I won't make the argument that Trump was any kind of a good President, but again......how was your life ruined by Donald Trump being elected President in 2016? Did all the LBGTQ people get locked up and sent to concentration camps? Is that still a fear for people like Huey? Were all liberal and Democratic voters and politicians and supporters being hunted down and systematically eliminated like it was the next Holocaust? Will that happen if Trump gets elected again? Were you left in financial ruin? Were black people disparaged moreso under the Trump campaign than the Biden campaign? Were they disparaged at all? Were Mexican-Americans disparaged? Were Chinese-Americans? Were other Asian-Americans? Who suffered at the hands of the Trump regime and how? If covid is the best you can do, well then why the huge stink back in 2016?.........................again, the whole point of Donald Trump winning the election back in 2016 was to show the country and the world what a f***ing joke American politics/government had become. People were either not taking it seriously or were taking it way too seriously. The problem is.............our society doubles down on their stances now, rather than searching for resolutions to conflict. So you all f***ing doubled down on wherever you stood on politics rather than looking for any kind of compromise, and it's actually only gotten worse despite Trump no longer being President and there still being a small chance that you could keep it that way. Funny how that worked, huh? Again, I'm just an evil monkey looking down at the world from my Ivory Tower high above watching it for what it is, not what one side of the political spectrum sees it as.................................just sayin.)
A second Trump presidency would be 100 x worse (Well then don't vote for him so he doesn't win............easy right? ;)) and quite possibly cause irreversible damage.
Irreversible damage huh.

Well..........friend................I hate to tell you this, but that's happening regardless of whether it's Harris or Trump. But you'll see.


4u5r7n1xkoka1.gif







joker-i-was-right-here.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT