ADVERTISEMENT

UPDATE: Arizona Charged w/ FIVE Level I Violations. 2 Yrs Ago was thought that Sean Miller Was Likely Done where He Would Have Walked w/ $10.3M

Shocking, Arizona is investigating Arizona and they haven’t found anything that makes Arizona look bad. That is difficult to comprehend. Maybe the Arizona law team trained with the crack Iowa law team that has done well with Barta firing and Stead.

They hired an independent firm who has a very good reputation for this kind of corruption.

So they have been scrutinized by that firm, the NCAA, the FBI and federal prosecutors. But Joeschmo and his brother knows better than all of them, he watches espn and reads yahoo.. and lest we forget he is a diehard twitiot.
 
They hired an independent firm who has a very good reputation for this kind of corruption.

So they have been scrutinized by that firm, the NCAA, the FBI and federal prosecutors. But Joeschmo and his brother knows better than all of them, he watches espn and reads yahoo.. and lest we forget he is a diehard twitiot.

I guess I should rephrase. Arizona hired people to investigate Arizona and found that a coach was guilty of taking bribes and nothing else wrong at Arizona. The NCAA is just starting their part of the investigation.
 
I guess I should rephrase. Arizona hired people to investigate Arizona and found that a coach was guilty of taking bribes and nothing else wrong at Arizona. The NCAA is just starting their part of the investigation.


Nope been on and off campus since 2017, the recent espn story is bogus.
 
Is Arizona currently under investigation by the NCAA?

All parties named in this case have been interviewed and scrutinized by personnel from the NCAA beginning in late 2017. Each player named was cleared to play while on campus, take what you will from it.
There is no “new” investigation, they seem to be merely keeping the inquiry open until the case is resolved by the prosecution, which is wise in case solid tangible evidence unknown to anyone outside of federal sources presents itself.
 
All parties named in this case have been interviewed and scrutinized by personnel from the NCAA beginning in late 2017. Each player named was cleared to play while on campus, take what you will from it.
There is no “new” investigation, they seem to be merely keeping the inquiry open until the case is resolved by the prosecution, which is wise in case solid tangible evidence unknown to anyone outside of federal sources presents itself.

So ‘yes/no’ answers are difficult for you. I will try another one. Has the investigation been closed? Feel free to stick with yes or no as an answer then you can rationalize it. Feel free to read the Arizona release on Saturday if you need help.
 
I read the release before it was out of Tucson and it was a point blank rebuttal of the fake news being spread about the program. As far as your problem with the nature of my answers, seems you can’t argue my points so you’ve resorted to picking at the format.

By the way anybody notice Adam Zagoria has been suspended from twitter for spreading false information? Lmao.
 
Cidhawkeye,
I just wanted to be clear that I don’t feel that Arizona should go unscathed in all of this. There were clear problems and things happening that anybody with the ability to be objective would understandably raise their eyebrows at.

I would guess that Arizona will face sanctions of some sort as a result. People may not like the severity of said sanctions however, due to the fact that Miller keeps excellent records and holds regular meeting on compliance in recognition of NCAA guidelines.
 
I read the release before it was out of Tucson and it was a point blank rebuttal of the fake news being spread about the program. As far as your problem with the nature of my answers, seems you can’t argue my points so you’ve resorted to picking at the format.

By the way anybody notice Adam Zagoria has been suspended from twitter for spreading false information? Lmao.

I don’t have an axe to grind with Miller, to think he wasn’t aware of some of this is difficult to believe.
To go forward, you didn’t answer my question. The release on Saturday refuted the fake news that a ‘new’ investigation has been started. That is the hill you have chosen to plant your flag on. Same question, is the NCAA investigation into Arizona closed?
The school doesn’t seem to think so.

“The University of Arizona is correcting recent inaccurate media reports. Any reports stating that the NCAA has either “started” or “launched” a new investigation at the University of Arizona are entirely false. To be clear, we will continue to cooperate fully with any NCAA proceedings in the best interest of the University and the men’s basketball program.”

It was first reported in February by Yahoo! Sportsthat the NCAA had begun an investigation into the program, almost certainly stemming from Arizona’s connections to the federal college basketball bribery scandal. The school had never formally confirmed such an inquiry had begun until Friday, when it told the Arizona Daily Star that “investigations into the University of Arizona men’s basketball program are ongoing at this time.”

Keep banging the drum.
 
Sounds like they are sticking up for the hometown team.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
I don’t have an axe to grind with Miller, to think he wasn’t aware of some of this is difficult to believe.
To go forward, you didn’t answer my question. The release on Saturday refuted the fake news that a ‘new’ investigation has been started. That is the hill you have chosen to plant your flag on. Same question, is the NCAA investigation into Arizona closed?
The school doesn’t seem to think so.

“The University of Arizona is correcting recent inaccurate media reports. Any reports stating that the NCAA has either “started” or “launched” a new investigation at the University of Arizona are entirely false. To be clear, we will continue to cooperate fully with any NCAA proceedings in the best interest of the University and the men’s basketball program.”

It was first reported in February by Yahoo! Sportsthat the NCAA had begun an investigation into the program, almost certainly stemming from Arizona’s connections to the federal college basketball bribery scandal. The school had never formally confirmed such an inquiry had begun until Friday, when it told the Arizona Daily Star that “investigations into the University of Arizona men’s basketball program are ongoing at this time.”

Keep banging the drum.


I didn’t need yahoo to tell me who was on campus since I’m there anyways, so yeah known this since 2017, why didn’t yahoo? Oh yeah, it’s because they have no sources at Arizona and needed an official press release to a local rag to find out. In my previous post I stated point blank nothing is closed, players have been cleared however. Jeebus reading comprehension....

It’s amusing that you guys keep linking espn and yahoo, two sources with clear ties to attorney Haney and Coach Pitino and Coach Izzo. Zagoria has been suspended by twitter. The Daily Star will be terminating someone very shortly for corruption themselves. Arizona will be releasing a strong statement in the next few days in regards to the sleaze.

Your welcome for the heads up.
 
Sounds like they are sticking up for the hometown team.

Or maybe there’s simply no proof to fire him? I told you he would likely continue to be coach barring any rock solid proof of wrongdoing. Honestly, that could still happen if there’s something out there. But I doubt it.
 
I didn’t need yahoo to tell me who was on campus since I’m there anyways, so yeah known this since 2017, why didn’t yahoo? Oh yeah, it’s because they have no sources at Arizona and needed an official press release to a local rag to find out. In my previous post I stated point blank nothing is closed, players have been cleared however. Jeebus reading comprehension....

It’s amusing that you guys keep linking espn and yahoo, two sources with clear ties to attorney Haney and Coach Pitino and Coach Izzo. Zagoria has been suspended by twitter. The Daily Star will be terminating someone very shortly for corruption themselves. Arizona will be releasing a strong statement in the next few days in regards to the sleaze.

Your welcome for the heads up.

I appreciate the heads up. Your ‘no’ answer gets lost in the paragraphs where you talk around the answer. Can you do a quick copy and paste of where you said ‘no’ when that is what I questioned. It should look something like this
‘No, the university has.......’
I can’t seem to find it.
 
I appreciate the heads up. Your ‘no’ answer gets lost in the paragraphs where you talk around the answer. Can you do a quick copy and paste of where you said ‘no’ when that is what I questioned. It should look something like this
‘No, the university has.......’
I can’t seem to find it.

Sorry I realize you are probably being facetious and sarcastic so no copy/paste. I will say I didn’t specifically say no, but I did make it clear the investigation wasn’t halted, so even went as far as to say that it was wise to keep it open. Reread the posts, I’m not wasting any more time on semantics.

In other news it appears that Christian Dawkins has refuted the legitimacy of the espn report concerning Sean Miller and Dawkins discussing delivering Deandre Ayton to Arizona.
He stated today, quote: “I never had conversations about delivering Deandre Ayton to Arizona for Sean Miller. Didn’t happen.”
Now, the guy is a pathological liar but every witch hunter for Coach Miller has been quoting this guy or leaks from his legal team for over a year. Now you can’t trust him right?
 
Last edited:
Sorry that’s your problem. Reread the posts, I’m not wasting any more time on petty BS.

In other news it appears that Christian Dawkins has refuted the legitimacy of the espn report concerning Sean Miller and Dawkins discussing delivering Deandre Ayton to Arizona.
He stated today, quote: “I never had conversations about delivering Deandre Ayton to Arizona for Sean Miller. Didn’t happen.”
Now, the guy is a pathological liar but every witch hunter for Coach Miller has been quoting this guy or leaks from his legal team for over a year. Now you can’t trust him right?

Petty bs indeed, you didn’t do it so it’s time to move on to other things. Common tactic. Enjoy the sunshine in Tempe.
 
Petty bs indeed, you didn’t do it so it’s time to move on to other things. Common tactic. Enjoy the sunshine in Tempe.


I edited my post to better reflect my actual sentiment, I was rushed in my original post.

The irony is rich in your closing take however, no comments about Dawkin’s statements today? It’s only going to get worse for the witch hunters for here on out, I predict that as time goes by the will be more and more egg on faces.

Also look for espn and yahoo to triple quadruple down on covering up their atrocious behavior and outright corrupt methods. Look for coaches that should have had the scrutiny all along to become even more Machiavellian in their efforts to keep the focus where it is.
 
Last edited:
I am obviously bias but even doing some media work in the past, it is the worst kept secret among coaches, players, journalists, etc that Arizona goes above and beyond in cheating. From people I know close to the program, it is even a common joke amongst college coaches and very well known people that cover college basketball.

Arizona basketball is much like Nebraska football fan wise. The fans worship the program and will attack people that are of the opinion Miller should get fired. The AD is a puppet and Miller has vastly more power than him and even the president at Arizona. Some donors wanted him gone but the donors with the deepest pockets wanted to stay by him, so as long as he has their support, nothing will happen. If Miller was fired Tucson would legitimately riot yet it is obvious, at the minimum, he is guilty of lack of institutional control.
 
I am obviously bias but even doing some media work in the past, it is the worst kept secret among coaches, players, journalists, etc that Arizona goes above and beyond in cheating. From people I know close to the program, it is even a common joke amongst college coaches and very well known people that cover college basketball.

Arizona basketball is much like Nebraska football fan wise. The fans worship the program and will attack people that are of the opinion Miller should get fired. The AD is a puppet and Miller has vastly more power than him and even the president at Arizona. Some donors wanted him gone but the donors with the deepest pockets wanted to stay by him, so as long as he has their support, nothing will happen. If Miller was fired Tucson would legitimately riot yet it is obvious, at the minimum, he is guilty of lack of institutional control.


Lmfao, an ASU fan and likely Phoenix media hack’s completely biased take. A representative of one of the most penalized programs in NCAA history....ladies and gentlemen. The southwest’s equivalent fan base to ISU as far as little brother syndrome ( basketball). People you know? Name names man if your going to throw allegations like that around. Made up BS is more likely.

I can almost guarantee lack of institutional control will not be the sanction. You clearly have no insight to the topic.
 
Last edited:
From Mike McCann (highly respected legal analyst) at Sports Illustrated today.

“As I explained in my story last week on Sean Miller, the NCAA and universities would be wise to adopt a healthy dose of skepticism towards uncorroborated allegations voiced by unreliable accusers against head coaches."
 
And one school currently has sports programs on probation

Contextually, historically it’s not even close. Seems you might have a vaunted ASU diploma as well. Or maybe your parents threw down 100k to avoid it like...
https://patch.com/arizona/phoenix/asu-gets-admissions-scandal-mention-not-reason-you-think

All extremely humiliating jokes aside I know plenty of asu grads and they typically are fine people who don’t spew out unsubstantiated rumors and lies.
 
Last edited:
From Mike DeCoursey at Sporting News...

“There were video and audiotapes played in court during the second trial in which second-hand suggestions were made regarding Arizona's Sean Miller allegedly violating NCAA rules. But there has been no proof presented to confirm this.

There had been an ESPN report last year that Miller was caught on tape discussing with Dawkins an offer for DeAndre Ayton, an All-American with the Wildcats in 2018-19 who just finished his rookie season with the Phoenix Suns. Miller emphatically denied the story at the time. After his second trial, so did Dawkins, telling reporter Adam Zagoria he "never had conversations" with Miller about a deal to send Ayton to UA. "I had no involvement with DeAndre Ayton," Dawkins said. "That's a fact."

In the initial trial, government witness T.J. Gassnola told the jury he facilitated payments to family members for Kansas recruit Billy Preston (who enrolled but never played for the Jayhawks) and KU center Silvio DeSousa (who played half a year but has been suspended). Gassnola also answered under oath, when asked if Self knew of those activities, "Never."

Firing these coaches under these circumstances would be a problematic endeavor, at best. Of course, the schools could remove anyone if willing to pay off the remainder of their contracts, but that would mean disbursing millions of dollars in each case. To remove them for cause requires, well, cause.”
 
Lmfao, an ASU fan and likely Phoenix media hack’s completely biased take. A representative of one of the most penalized programs in NCAA history....ladies and gentlemen. The southwest’s equivalent fan base to ISU as far as little brother syndrome ( basketball). People you know? Name names man if your going to throw allegations like that around. Made up BS is more likely.

I can almost guarantee lack of institutional control will not be the sanction. You clearly have no insight to the topic.

Lmfao, an ASU fan and likely Phoenix media hack’s completely biased take. A representative of one of the most penalized programs in NCAA history....ladies and gentlemen. The southwest’s equivalent fan base to ISU as far as little brother syndrome ( basketball). People you know? Name names man if your going to throw allegations like that around. Made up BS is more likely.

I can almost guarantee lack of institutional control will not be the sanction. You clearly have no insight to the topic.
Contextually, historically it’s not even close. Seems you might have a vaunted ASU diploma as well. Or maybe your parents threw down 100k to avoid it like...
https://patch.com/arizona/phoenix/asu-gets-admissions-scandal-mention-not-reason-you-think

All extremely humiliating jokes aside I know plenty of asu grads and they typically are fine people who don’t spew out unsubstantiated rumors and lies.

What I said isn't a lie or ubstustantiated at all. It is what I've heard from people, not just on the ASU side. Arizona cheats at a high level and people in college basketball circles know this. On lack of institutional control at Arizona, it isn't just the basketball program, but the way women were treated by football staff, the numerous gang rapes by football players, the track coach threatening his student-athlete. You do have more knowledge though in what Arizona could face with information that was given, which isn't enough to fire Miller. You are right on that. Schlabach's story among others weren't proven to be factual. But there is fire amongst all that smoke, trust me.

Also, my ASU degree got me into the #1 grad school of my profession. On a full ride, by the way. So no offense taken to your attempted insult. Go Hawks and Go Devils
 
Last edited:
Contextually, historically it’s not even close. Seems you might have a vaunted ASU diploma as well. Or maybe your parents threw down 100k to avoid it like...
https://patch.com/arizona/phoenix/asu-gets-admissions-scandal-mention-not-reason-you-think

All extremely humiliating jokes aside I know plenty of asu grads and they typically are fine people who don’t spew out unsubstantiated rumors and lies.


“Contextually, historically it’s not even close.”
Yet again, not what I posted about. One school currently has a program on probation. It’s not a debatable issue. It was a statement of fact. As far as the historical part, which wasn’t mentioned or implied in my post but you chose to introduce it anyway...... why do you do that?

I am fully aware of the history, you probably should have thrown in point shaving. Are you in academia or politics per chance? HR? You are adept at deflections and whataboutisms, it’s a little amusing and fairly annoying at the same time. Good work achieving that. FYI didn’t attend either school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ASUHawkeye
“Contextually, historically it’s not even close.”
Yet again, not what I posted about. One school currently has a program on probation. It’s not a debatable issue. It was a statement of fact. As far as the historical part, which wasn’t mentioned or implied in my post but you chose to introduce it anyway...... why do you do that?

I am fully aware of the history, you probably should have thrown in point shaving. Are you in academia or politics per chance? HR? You are adept at deflections and whataboutisms, it’s a little amusing and fairly annoying at the same time. Good work achieving that. FYI didn’t attend either school.

Point shaving, teammates murdering one another, alleged paying of Harden, porn star cheerleaders, my personal favorite, after Lutes wife died the ASU crowd heartily chanting “ where’s Bobbi?” the same fan base that chanted “PLO” after Steve Kerr’s father was assassinated. So spare me on the false equivalencies.

Your love affair with cherry picking topics or frivolous minutiae in order to (not) prove a point is also amusing. I’m glad we are both so amused.

I made a comment about generalizations that the other poster was rumor-mongering about with. I made a specific point about the ridiculousness of such an alumn casting such stones considering his alma-mater’s history. You decided to don your cape and fly to the rescue with some cherry picked rebuttal about the dive-team.
 
Last edited:
Point shaving, teammates murdering one another, alleged paying of Harden, porn star cheerleaders, my personal favorite, after Lutes wife died the ASU crowd heartily chanting “ where’s Bobbi?” the same fan base that chanted “PLO” after Steve Kerr’s father was assassinated. So spare me on the false equivalencies.

Your love affair with cherry picking topics or frivolous minutiae in order to (not) prove a point is also amusing. I’m glad we are both so amused.

I made a comment about generalizations that the other poster was rumor-mongering about with. I made a specific point about the ridiculousness of such an alumn casting such stones considering his alma-mater’s history. You decided to don your cape and fly to the rescue with some cherry picked rebuttal about the dive-team.

You struggle to address my very simple questions, you can’t stay on subject and you have perfected the faux outrage. Pretty nifty hat trick. I don’t have a dog in this show but your posting technique is bothersome to me. Keep working at it, it entertains when the defenders keep working back to their agenda rather than staying on point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ASUHawkeye
A few dbag students isn't the "crowd." No ASU fan I know would be okay with that and I know tons.

That being said it goes both ways then. I've heard Arizona fans yell obscenities about Pat Tillman dying by friendly fire and I have had my car keyed at Wildcat games in Tucson. Of course most fans don't act that way but there are always a few. Our WR's family had their car windows smashed in as well last year following the 19 pt collapse by Arizona. However, the worst was when Iowa played at Arizona. My grandparents were forced to leave at half time due to drinks and vulgarity being tossed at them. I also had a drink thrown my way but the person didn't have the same aim as the one that hit the Oregon cheerleader. Also, you bash me for spreading "rumors" then go spread some yourself? You are a beauty. Typical little kitten. The litter box city of Tucson must have something in the water

Point shaving, teammates murdering one another, alleged paying of Harden, porn star cheerleaders, my personal favorite, after Lutes wife died the ASU crowd heartily chanting “ where’s Bobbi?” the same fan base that chanted “PLO” after Steve Kerr’s father was assassinated. So spare me on the false equivalencies.

Your love affair with cherry picking topics or frivolous minutiae in order to (not) prove a point is also amusing. I’m glad we are both so amused.

I made a comment about generalizations that the other poster was rumor-mongering about with. I made a specific point about the ridiculousness of such an alumn casting such stones considering his alma-mater’s history. You decided to don your cape and fly to the rescue with some cherry picked rebuttal about the dive-team.
 
Last edited:
What’s next for Arizona and Sean Miller: In the age of reform, the NCAA hammer looms
Miller could get sanctioned severely for the actions of his former assistant

By JON WILNER
jwilner@bayareanewsgroup.com
Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: May 6, 2019 at 7:41 am
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/05...r-in-the-age-of-reform-the-ncaa-hammer-looms/

Sean Miller didn’t testify in the basketball corruption case in New York, and his voice was never heard. But incriminating evidence and testimony turned the Arizona coach into a major presence during the proceedings.

For the Wildcats’ basketball program specifically and the university generally, the headlines were brutal, the optics abysmal — all in all, it was exponentially worse than a blowout loss to a No. 13 seed.

The trial is winding down, with closing arguments today followed by jury deliberation. And yet, Arizona’s problems are far from over.

Goodbye, FBI; hello, NCAA.

At some point in the near future, the governing body of college sports is expected to use information produced by the government as the basis for determining whether programs implicated in the scandal — not only Arizona but Louisville, Kansas and others — committed NCAA transgressions.

“What we’d like to do is have (information) at our disposal to make judgments about whether or not it is relevant to our rules and whether or not those rules have been violated,” Donald Remy, the NCAA’s chief legal officer, told Yahoo in February.

As often as Miller was dragged into the muck, there remains no definitive proof that he paid former players Deandre Ayton and Rawle Alkins.

In fact, the NCAA and FBI have both investigated Miller and Arizona. In multiple trips to Tucson, they examined bank records and emails, interviewed relevant parties and found no federal crime or rule violations.

As Sports Illustrated legal analyst Michael McCann outlines in this deep dive on the complicated legal situation facing Arizona — it’s worth reading whether or not you believe Miller or not (and especially if you don’t) — Miller was viewed on campus as a stickler for compliance.

To some extent, it might not matter.

Miller didn’t have to commit a federal crime or personally funnel money to players in order for the NCAA to impose severe sanctions on Arizona.

Sanctions that could lead to Miller’s dismissal.

Sanctions that could devastate the Wildcats’ program for years.

Sanctions that could play very well politically for NCAA president Mark Emmert.

In fact, let’s presuppose that the NCAA finds no evidence that Miller paid, or attempted to pay players.

Instead, let’s focus on two indisputable facts:

* Miller had a relationship with Christian Dawkins, a convicted felon and spectacular representative of the mess that Emmert hopes to clean up.

* Miller’s longtime former assistant, Book Richardson, pleaded guilty to one count of felony bribery for actions taken while employed by Arizona.

Those facts would have created an ominous situation for the Wildcats in the era of NCAA enforcement that existed for a half century.

In today’s climate of reform, which grew out of the very scandal that has engulfed Arizona, Richardson’s guilt and Miller’s relationship with Dawkins could be all the fuel the NCAA requires to make an example of the Wildcats
.

This isn’t academic fraud (North Carolina) or child molestation (Penn State) — cases that unfolded outside the traditional scope of NCAA authority.

This is a wheelhouse issue for Emmert and his team: An assistant coach and wanna-be agent engaging in under-the-table payments and player procurement.

The packaging might be different, but it’s old-fashioned cheating at heart.

And here is Emmert, shouting from the top row of the grandstand perched on the rooftop of NCAA headquarters, while cloaked in the rhetoric of reform, embracing Condoleezza Rice and brandishing unprecedented enforcement power designed to eradicate the filth.

(Under a relatively new NCAA bylaw, head coaches are held responsible for the actions of their assistants unless they can rebut the presumption of responsibility. In other words, ignorance isn’t a viable defense for rules violations.)

Are we to believe Emmert will give Arizona a pass?

The Wildcats are, in many respects, a perfect target for the NCAA at the dawn of the age of reform: They’re nationally known but not too big — they’re juicy red meat but not a true blue blood.

Imagine the anarchy that would come to recruiting if Miller isn’t sanctioned for Richardson’s actions and his own interactions with Dawkins.

Imagine the pushback from the membership if the NCAA doesn’t hammer Arizona.

(It would be the antithesis of Penn State: Instead of being criticized for overreach, Emmert would get slammed for doing too little.)

Would sanctions take the form of vacated wins and lost scholarships … or postseason bans?

Would Miller get hit with a five-game wrist-slap … or a one-year suspension?

The specifics of the sanctions are anyone’s guess, but the smart money is on severe.

For Emmert and his team, the politically expedient path has been paved by the evidentiary remains of convicted felons.
 
Seems to be a lot of agreement that:

* NCAA sanctions are coming to Arizona this year.

* Sean Miller won't survive.

But hey, don't feel sorry for him. He will walk with $10.3M as severance, regardless of the reason for termination.

The tweet that follows: this guy has his own radio show in Phoenix (The Monty Show on 1580 The Fanatic, part of ESPN Radio).

What he's reporting:

 
Last edited:
And, yes, Sean Miller was caught on SEVERAL FBI wiretaps, talking to Dawkins.

And, yes, Arizona officials have seen the transcripts of those wiretaps.

Steve Haney was Dawkins' defense attorney.

Check it out:

 
Last edited:
At the 2:20 mark, the Phoenix radio show host and Dawkins' defense attorney (Steve Haney) talk about Sean Miller & why Sean Miller never took the stand.

Haney also confirms that several calls between Dawkins and Miller were caught on FBI wiretap.

At the 15:30 mark, Haney is asked if the public will ever hear the Sean Miller/Dawkins wiretaps (or get access to the transcripts). He thought we would.

Listen:

 
Oh these are just stories being made up by people jealous of Arizona and Miller, there isn’t anything too any of it. These journalists will get suspended from their jobs because the school has a big release coming showing that they did no wrong and none of those things are fact.... just thought I would beat the cat to it.
 
Oh these are just stories being made up by people jealous of Arizona and Miller, there isn’t anything too any of it. These journalists will get suspended from their jobs because the school has a big release coming showing that they did no wrong and none of those things are fact.... just thought I would beat the cat to it.
i will never forget, during an Iowa game, when Fran Frachilla (sp) said that you will never catch Fran McCaffery on an FBI wire tap.
 
If the NCAA does drop the hammer next fall, the Rivals #12, 13, 33, and 66 players will feel foolish for being taken in by the Miller staff. Their 2019 class is ridiculously talented, and I can only imagine they chose AZ believing no severe sanctions were coming.
 
ADVERTISEMENT