Lmfao. So your position is that you need to know whether the theory will ever be confirmed in the future before studying it is valid? Should we call that the time machine approach?
What’s the worst that could happen?
- Thread starter seminole97
- Start date
He believes humans were made from dirt yet challenges abiogenesis. He's a hypocritical creationist at that.
My position is that teaching an untestable and ultimately unknowable theory as scientific fact is disingenuous at best and stifles understanding of what science really is and can and cannot accomplish. Also trying to make arguments on a message board that use such theories and presenting them as fact is an intellectually dishonest approach.
Again, no. Your position is that God created the universe in 7 days. You're just too much of a coward to state it. Should we start calling you Judas Poet?
If a tree falls in the forest and there's no one there to record it...
...how can we possibly claim it fell?!?!
Good. Explain how you can "observe" gravity. That question was asked a while back and I can't find an answer. Here's his question...
Where's your answer?
I'm not explaining anything to a coward who has me on ignore.
This prompted this response from Warrior Poet in our side conversation:
You're a dishonest little twerp who has lied to me and about me repeatedly.
I never said the following; But teaching that humans were created from dirt promotes science?
But you keep doing your little victory dance out there for the others to see. While we both know you're a liar.
I had to remind him that it was a question, not a statement. He hates it when his own words are used against him.
Why did you attribute that to me? I didn't say that. Big fat liar.
BTW - the victory dance is always fun.
