What is mankind’s craziest historical event?
- Thread starter BrunoMars420
- Start date
craziest event , easy . Dropping the Atomic Bomb .
The All Father Odin scoffs at Your Christ God
That’s a theory that isn’t supported by the evidence. Admit you know next to nothing about the authors of the gospels. Stop making up stories to make your faith seem more plausible.
Take that biblical studies class. You don’t represent the consensus on the topic. Why do you feel the need to over sell? The factual truth isn’t enough for you for some reason.
Why are you insulting my salesmanship?
I'm trying to save souls here. It's not like I'm selling toasters.
He lacks the faith. That's the punchline of all of this. That's why he bullshits himself- and peddles it here- that this faith-based belief is also historical fact. And, all of it is to avoid some fictional fire pit post-mortem.
That was a great move... twice!Bringing King Kong back to New York City from Skull Island........
If life is God's greatest gift, he has a sick mind snuffing it out so often.
Well, recognizing, referring to, and acknowledging God as a "he" is probably the most frequent glitch in that path. I've never totally understood why humans make sure God is human, too... and, ONLY human... so wired to me.
You would have more credibility if you stuck to the facts. Inventing a better backstory is really just bearing false witness. Don’t sin just to sound better on HROT.
In Mormonism, Jesus was a regular human who got elevated by being such a good Mormon on another planet. And if you are a good Mormon, you could get elevated to godhood too with your own planet.
Are you responding to Strum?
You should know, by now, that he's mentally handicapped...
The Gospels are historically reliable, but, they are just a part of the reason for my faith; near-death experiences, miracles, the Shroud of Turin and the logic of belief and illogic of atheism (a sort of version of Pascal's Wager) plus my own spiritual experience.
If ONE of those is true, then you and your boy Strum are in deep doo-doo.
They are not historically reliable. Stop making up claims to non-existing evidence. They are historically in error multiple times.
Faith is the reason, not historical accuracy.
Oh, yes. I'm very familiar with Mormonism, too. I've had several crash-courses from individuals, and I have read a lot of the BOMLDS.
Elohim, The Godhead, Jehovah, the Trinity is 3 separate things... fun stuff.
Brian, of course has dubbed Mormonism as totally insane, when it's not that much different from Christianity or any other religion.
If the Gospels could be proven historically inaccurate, they would have by now.
They have been. From the census in the origin story to the scapegoat Barabas. Take the Bible study class. This is mainstream consensus stuff.
I believe that minor details could be in error, for sure, but the most important event, Jesus resurrecting from the dead, is a historical fact.
https://crossexamined.org/10-reasons-accept-resurrection-jesus-historical-fact/
Even my Jewish peeps admitted that Jesus resurrected from the dead, they just believe he did it through magic, which was bad.
If the factual details are in error, it’s not historically reliable. And the resurrection mythology isn’t a historical fact either. Stick to faith.
And, keep hijacking every thread and turning it into Brian's inability to have faith in his own mythology.
Wrong about what? When your facts are wrong, you’re not reliable. That’s axiomatic.
