I think they both would benefit from another year. Kris doesn’t look ready to me but has a high ceiling. Keegan looks to be more ready. I agree with those that say to thoroughly check with those in the know before throwing away a college degree.
I think they both would benefit from another year. Kris doesn’t look ready to me but has a high ceiling. Keegan looks to be more ready. I agree with those that say to thoroughly check with those in the know before throwing away a college degree.
Maybe better said throwing away to play with his teammates and get a college education. He needs to make sure he is surrounded by those that care about him the person. Fran will be a big help in screening that as well. I still say Kris isn’t ready. Keegan might be but would improve his stock by staying. If he is truly, legitimately a first round pick (top 10 as some have posted) he should go. I’ve not read anywhere that Kris is there.It wouldn’t be “throwing away a college degree” if he opted to enter the NBA draft. Anyone, literally almost anyone, can get a college degree online from multiple places. I’d have to imagine Kenyon and his wife have helped prepare their sons academically pretty well throughout their high school/prep/college careers, and it’s be pretty easy for Keegan to come back and finish his degree after, or even during a professional career.
There's a lot more questions to ask then just that. This board had a lot of great discussions about Luka last year on this subject. Luka isn't the same as Keegan. Keegan is not the same as Khris. Every player's situation is different. Do you care whether he gets drafted in first or second or at all? Can he improve or hurt draft status by coming back? Does a 20 year old kid want to start a professional career and sit on the benched compared to being a starter in college? Is the goal for you to just get you're kids drafted or give them the best chance to stay in the NBA? This issue isn't black and white. It's got a whole lot of gray involved in it. It's definitely not a one size fits all situation.If your child had an opportunity to play in the NBA, would you tell them to stay in college for 4 years?
Exactly.It wouldn’t be “throwing away a college degree” if he opted to enter the NBA draft. Anyone, literally almost anyone, can get a college degree online from multiple places. I’d have to imagine Kenyon and his wife have helped prepare their sons academically pretty well throughout their high school/prep/college careers, and it’s be pretty easy for Keegan to come back and finish his degree after, or even during a professional career.
This is my point as well. Look what's happening to Luka. He barely gets off the bench and he plays for the worst team in the league. As talented as Keegan is, there is no guarantee that he will get a lot of playing time, even if he does become a high draft pick. So much will depend on the team that selects him. Yes, the money is great, but it will still be there next year as well. Would he rather be just a small cog on an NBA team or a big fish playing with his twin big fish in a relatively small pond for another year.There's a lot more questions to ask then just that. This board had a lot of great discussions about Luka last year on this subject. Luka isn't the same as Keegan. Keegan is not the same as Khris. Every player's situation is different. Do you care whether he gets drafted in first or second or at all? Can he improve or hurt draft status by coming back? Does a 20 year old kid want to start a professional career and sit on the benched compared to being a starter in college? Is the goal for you to just get you're kids drafted or give them the best chance to stay in the NBA? This issue isn't black and white. It's got a whole lot of gray involved in it. It's definitely not a one size fits all situation.
You can always go back and get a degree but very few do.
Terrible idea, he's already old for the draft. That would only hurt him. Another year wouldn't have helped Garza, or else he would've stayed.This is my point as well. Look what's happening to Luka. He barely gets off the bench and he plays for the worst team in the league. As talented as Keegan is, there is not guarantee that he will get a lot of playing time, even if he does become a high draft pick. So much will depend on the team that selects him. Yes, the money is great, but it will still be there next year as well. Would he rather be just a small cog on an NBA team or a big fish playing with his twin big fish in a relatively small pond for another year.
Luka had nowhere near the nba potential of Keegan. It was incredible that his work ethic got him drafted. For Luka to even be on a regular season NBA roster is quite a feat for him.This is my point as well. Look what's happening to Luka. He barely gets off the bench and he plays for the worst team in the league. As talented as Keegan is, there is not guarantee that he will get a lot of playing time, even if he does become a high draft pick. So much will depend on the team that selects him. Yes, the money is great, but it will still be there next year as well. Would he rather be just a small cog on an NBA team or a big fish playing with his twin big fish in a relatively small pond for another year.
Since when is 21 old for the draft and will hurt him? This is basketball not football.Terrible idea, he's already old for the draft. That would only hurt him. Another year wouldn't have helped Garza, or else he would've stayed.
Since now. Look at the ages of the top ten projected picks for the next draft. Keegan is the oldest.Since when is 21 old for the draft and will hurt him? This is basketball not football.
Garza just turned 23. Most of those drafted are at least juniors and 22.Since now. Look at the ages of the top ten projected picks for the next draft. Keegan is the oldest.
Since when is 21 old for the draft and will hurt him? This is basketball not football.
Look at last year. Only one pick in the top ten who is 22, none who are 21, most are 18-19. Are you just guessing at these things?Look at the actual ages of the first round picks historically!
It isn't laughable. Keegan is pretty smart and that was one of his questions to agency we are entertaining. On one side they say that his age (21) is valuable because he is more mature, has played against physically developed players in college and they don't have to worry about the "off the court" things that could get a player younger than 21 in trouble. On the other hand, the top 10-12 teams are pretty bad and look for "long term" development with younger players.22 is not too old. I could give a shit about early entries. Are you saying he will be hurt by staying because he will be too old. That is laughable.
Sound planning. I was very happy when Weezy went to San Antonio, sad for Luka when he went to Detroit. I think landing with a coach like Pop is a great opportunity for a young player. Would love to see either of the Murrays there.It isn't laughable. Keegan is pretty smart and that was one of his questions to agency we are entertaining. On one side they say that his age (21) is valuable because he is more mature, has played against physically developed players in college and they don't have to worry about the "off the court" things that could get a player younger than 21 in trouble. On the other hand, the top 10-12 teams are pretty bad and look for "long term" development with younger players.
Getting drafted is one thing, but staying in the league for a long time is key. If he were to leave Iowa, going later in the draft would allow him to go to a solid team with veteran leadership and a stable coach. He could be a role player from day one as he works on the skill set so many have been raving about at the next level. Trust me, we are doing our homework for what will be best for Keegan, Iowa Basketball and our family as a whole.
I appreciate you sharing what this experience is like because it’s fascinating to read an inside perspective. No matter what, I think we all wish Keegan the best.It isn't laughable. Keegan is pretty smart and that was one of his questions to agency we are entertaining. On one side they say that his age (21) is valuable because he is more mature, has played against physically developed players in college and they don't have to worry about the "off the court" things that could get a player younger than 21 in trouble. On the other hand, the top 10-12 teams are pretty bad and look for "long term" development with younger players.
Getting drafted is one thing, but staying in the league for a long time is key. If he were to leave Iowa, going later in the draft would allow him to go to a solid team with veteran leadership and a stable coach. He could be a role player from day one as he works on the skill set so many have been raving about at the next level. Trust me, we are doing our homework for what will be best for Keegan, Iowa Basketball and our family as a whole.
You're ignoring the facts. 22 is old for a top ten pick. That's a fact. Keep hanging on to your beliefs, you're just looking like a fool. Did you know grass is orange too?22 is not too old. I could give a shit about early entries. Are you saying he will be hurt by staying because he will be too old. That is laughable.
Unless there is some unforeseen circumstance, it sounds as if Keegan is 100% gone after this season. No point in debating it any further and just enjoy it while he's here.
Getting drafted is one thing, but staying in the league for a long time is key. If he were to leave Iowa, going later in the draft would allow him to go to a solid team with veteran leadership and a stable coach. He could be a role player from day one as he works on the skill set so many have been raving about at the next level. Trust me, we are doing our homework for what will be best for Keegan, Iowa Basketball and our family as a whole.
My point is you are no where near your prime dip sh*t. You’re not too old at 22 to play basketball. But hey I’m 67 maybe there is still a chance to be as wise as you!You're ignoring the facts. 22 is old for a top ten pick. That's a fact. Keep hanging on to your beliefs, you're just looking like a fool. Did you know grass is orange too?
I didn't mean to get you all worked up chief. It's just basketball.My point is you are no where near your prime dip sh*t. You’re not too old at 22 to play basketball. But hey I’m 67 maybe there is still a chance to be as wise as you!
My point is you are no where near your prime dip sh*t. You’re not too old at 22 to play basketball. But hey I’m 67 maybe there is still a chance to be as wise as you!
Coming back to this. The fact that Garza has played a number of games in the NBA now and had a game the other night where he got 20 is testament to his hard work and skill. Just incredible. Never would have thought when he came to Iowa that he would play in a real NBA game. I have no idea if he sticks for multiple years, but hats off to him for actually getting on a roster.Dodger pretty much hit the nail on the head. It’s the defensive versatility piece. NBA teams will exploit any mismatch on the floor, and Garza’s relative lack of athleticism at the 5 makes him a bad matchup against athletic big men (Jarrett Allen had a field day going over the top of Luka earlier this year). It also means that opposing teams will find a way to switch him and force him into defending their more athletic/quicker guards which is simply no contest.
In short, his offensive productivity (which is still going to be good in the NBA) will probably end up offsetting the liability that he is at the other end of the floor
Agreed. Great for him to see the fruits of his unmatched work ethic, and great for Iowa to have another NBA player to sell prospective recruits onComing back to this. The fact that Garza has played a number of games in the NBA now and had a game the other night where he got 20 is testament to his hard work and skill. Just incredible. Never would have thought when he came to Iowa that he would play in a real NBA game. I have no idea if he sticks for multiple years, but hats off to him for actually getting on a roster.