ADVERTISEMENT

  • Poll
How do you feel about the Brendan Sullivan news?

How do you feel about the Brendan Sullivan news?

  • Very Satisfied

    Votes: 56 39.2%
  • Satisfied

    Votes: 75 52.4%
  • Meh

    Votes: 11 7.7%
  • Dissatisfied

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not satisfied at all

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 0.7%

I voted satisfied. Very satisfied would've been getting a QB from Ohio State or someone of that caliber to come in and immediately be given the keys as the starter.

But, big get for Iowa. This is insurance, and potentially a better option than Cade. We'll have to wait and see -- but it's definitely a good thing.

VA Congressman Introduces Bill To Remove Federal Restrictions on Purchasing or Possessing Suppressors

VA Congressman Introduces Bill To Remove Federal Restrictions on Purchasing or Possessing Suppressors: Congressman Bob Good
Virginia Congressman Bob Good has recently introduced the Silencers Help Us Save Hearing (SHUSH) Act, signaling his commitment to Second Amendment rights. Despite facing a tough primary fight for re-election, Good’s legislative proposal aims to eliminate federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of suppressors, highlighting his stance on firearm ownership rights.

Upholding Second Amendment Liberties
Good’s initiative underscores his opposition to regulatory burdens on individuals’ constitutional right to bear arms. By advocating for the removal of barriers to suppressor acquisition, he seeks to ensure that lawful gun owners can access safety accessories without undue federal oversight or taxation, asserting the importance of protecting Second Amendment freedoms.

Addressing Noise Disturbances
One practical benefit of easing suppressor restrictions is the potential reduction of noise disturbances associated with firearm use. In areas like Burgin, Kentucky, where residents have raised concerns about disruptions from nearby gun ranges, suppressors offer a solution to mitigate noise levels. While not silencing gunfire entirely, suppressors can significantly decrease noise, promoting neighborly coexistence.

Limited Legislative Prospects
Despite the merits of the SHUSH Act, its passage into law faces significant obstacles with a Democratic-controlled Senate and White House. Nevertheless, Good’s introduction of the bill serves as a symbolic gesture to Second Amendment supporters, reaffirming his advocacy for individual gun rights amid a politically charged landscape.

Voter Impact and Perception
Good’s legislative maneuvering ahead of the primary election in Virginia’s 5th District may resonate positively with constituents, particularly among gun-owning voters. By championing firearm freedoms through the SHUSH Act, he aims to solidify his standing as a pro-Second Amendment candidate, strategically positioning himself amidst electoral competition.

Electoral Dynamics and Candidate Strategies
As Good navigates the electoral landscape, he faces challenges not only from political opponents but also from voter scrutiny regarding past actions and party nomination processes. The introduction of the SHUSH Act adds another dimension to the campaign, offering voters a clear delineation of his policy priorities and commitment to safeguarding constitutional rights.

Evaluating Candidate Integrity
In a contested primary race against state Sen. John McGuire, Good’s legislative initiatives may sway undecided voters grappling with competing considerations. Beyond policy alignment, constituents weigh factors such as candidate integrity, electoral transparency, and the broader implications of legislative proposals on individual liberties.

Constituent Perspectives and Voting Decisions
Constituents in Virginia’s 5th District confront a complex decision-making process as they evaluate candidates and their policy platforms. Good’s advocacy for the SHUSH Act resonates with gun-owning voters concerned about regulatory encroachments, prompting reflection on how legislative proposals align with their values and priorities.

The Future of Second Amendment Advocacy
As the primary election approaches, voters in Virginia’s 5th District face critical choices that will shape the trajectory of Second Amendment advocacy. Good’s introduction of the SHUSH Act underscores the ongoing debate over firearm freedoms, highlighting the significance of individual liberties and the role of elected officials in safeguarding constitutional rights.

Influence on Voter Perceptions
What do you think? How do incumbent lawmakers’ legislative initiatives, such as the SHUSH Act, influence voter perceptions and electoral outcomes in primary races? What role do single-issue voter blocs, such as Second Amendment advocates, play in shaping electoral dynamics and candidate strategies?

Electoral Transparency
How can candidates effectively navigate concerns over electoral transparency and party nomination processes to maintain voter trust and support? In what ways do legislative proposals like the SHUSH Act reflect broader debates over individual liberties, regulatory oversight, and public safety?


.

Migrants in Denver refuse to leave encampments until their 13 demands are met by the Mayor

What a mess. Gotta love it when uninvited guests start making those demands. As you can see, they want free food, free medical care, free housing and free attorneys. Note that they are flying the Mexican flag at their camp, too.

Some of those demands sent to Denver Mayor Mike Johnson include:

* Migrants will cook their own food with fresh, culturally appropriate ingredients provided by the City instead of premade meals – rice, chicken, flour, oil, butter, tomatoes, onions, etc

* Shower access will be available without time limits & can be accessed whenever

* Medical professional visits will happen regularly & referrals/connections for specialty care will be made as needed

* "Connection to employment support, including work permit applications for those who qualify,"

* "Consultations for each person/family with a free immigration lawyer."

* Privacy within the shelter once moved there

* "No more verbal or physical or mental abuse will be permitted from the staff, including no sheriff sleeping inside & monitoring 24/7 – we are not criminals & won’t be treated as such."


Here is video:



Related story:

  • Wow
Reactions: Hawkman34

Wouldja?

TikTok star stuns by revealing she needed surgery to remove vibrator from her rectum​


tiktok-sophzaloafz-vibrator-x-ray-rectum-1120.jpg


When will people stop sticking strange objects into their bodily orifices? There are actually products designed with that intended purpose - there is no reason to resort to dumbbells, plastic ducks and yes, even eels.

Humans have developed an unfortunate habit of shoving things where the sun don't shine, and one woman looking for a good time decided a vibrator would be just the ticket.

However, her escapade quite literally became a pain in the butt. While we all know some people find pleasure in pain, this woman's unintentional foray into S&M unfortunately ended in A&E.

Documenting her experience on TikTok earlier this month, British woman Sophs - who goes by the username @sophzaloafz - revealed the vibrator became lodged inside her rectum.

"I got a vibrator stuck up my arse," she matter-of-factly captioned the now-viral clip.

Sophs admitted her indiscretion landed in her hospital, even sharing an X-ray image of the vibrator lodged inside her body. After she failed to retrieve the three-inch toy herself, Sophs said she knew she needed medical help - but first endured an entire night with the still-buzzing vibrator trapped inside her.

In the video, Sophs said she had the object surgically removed when she made it to hospital the following morning. When she awoke from the procedure, the vibrator was sitting next to her in a plastic bag - and apparently, still had some battery life.

She has since made her account private.

According to media outlets who viewed the video, Sophs elaborated on the incident and explained she had been 'getting busy' while her children were asleep. When she realised the vibrator was stuck, she felt too embarrassed to call an ambulance - which led to her rather restless night's sleep.

"I tried to sleep which was quite difficult because it was literally buzzing on my spine. Eventually, I did fall asleep. I woke up and it was off, so one would assume the battery had died. That was very wrong of me to assume," she said.

"I woke up in recovery. On the table was a kidney dish with a plastic bag. Curious old me, who was still on antiseptic [anaesthesia], lent over, grabbed it to see what it was.

"I pressed the on button and it f**king worked, didn't it! I think it must have had some cool technology. It must have had a self-timer. Or [the doctors] thought, 'she had such a good time, let's replace the batteries for her, completely free of charge'."


Sophs' vibrating venture follows a case that made international headlines last month after appearing in an academic medical journal. The case report documented the experience of a Brazilian man who was hospitalised after a metallic, 20cm-long, 2kg dumbbell became lodged in his rectum.

And in 2017, Newshub filed an Official Information Act request with the District Health Board for information on the miscellaneous items that were found up New Zealanders' bums that year.

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/life...rgery-to-remove-vibrator-from-her-rectum.html

1st world problems thread.

I ordered some deep dish pizzas from Bertolini's in Chicago after a friend had tried some. The thin crust were great, but the deep dish were problematic, like deep dish tends to be at home. Lou Malnati's is the only place I've ordered from that seems to have developed a deep dish that ships well, and cooks well at home. So, I thought about getting a heat sink, like you often see at a restaurant. The Bertolini's pizzas require thawing before cooking, so I figured a heat sink would work well. But, I can't find one on Amazon, E-Bay, or anywhere. Amazon doesn't seem to carry them amongst all the pizza supplies they offer. E-Bay has sold them in the past, but none are currently available. I found a restaurant supply place that sells them in bulk, but they won't ship just one.
What kind of a world is this?
  • Sad
Reactions: NDallasRuss

2025 Three-Star Florida Wideout Considering the Hawkeyes

The second Florida receiver Iowa offered this week is 2025 three-star, Chase Collier.

Collier talks a budding relationship with another 2025 Iowa recruit, what has impressed him about receivers coach Jon Budmayr, official visit plans and more.

STORY:
  • Like
Reactions: DevineHawk

UNRWA chief shuts East Jerusalem HQ after Israelis set fire around compound

Deplorable:

Israeli residents twice set fire to the perimeter of the headquarters of UNRWA, the U.N. agency for Palestinians, in East Jerusalem on Thursday, the agency’s chief said. The attacks led to the decision to shut down the compound “until proper security is restored,” he said.
U.N. agency staff members were in the compound when the fire was started, UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini said on social media Thursday. No casualties were reported, though the fire damaged outdoor areas. U.N. staff members had to put out the fire themselves before fire officials and police showed up, Lazzarini said.
A crowd accompanied by armed people stood outside the compound, chanting, “Burn down the United Nations,” Lazzarini said, sharing a video posted on Israeli media.
“This is an outrageous development. Once again, the lives of U.N. staff were at a serious risk,” he said.

Login to view embedded media
Similar incidents have occurred at the compound over the past two months, he said, citing demonstrators throwing rocks at U.N. staff members and buildings, harassment and intimidation of staff members, as well as vandalism and damage to the compound.
“On several occasions, Israeli extremists threatened our staff with guns,” Lazzarini said.
In light of the “second appalling incident in less than a week,” the UNRWA chief said he decided to temporarily close the compound.
Lazzarini said it is the responsibility of the Israeli government to ensure the safety of U.N. personnel and facilities. He called on those with influence in Israel to put an end to the attacks and hold perpetrators responsible.
“Anything less will set a new, dangerous standard,” he added.

The world’s largest carbon-capture plant just switched on

After decades of hype and doubt, giant factories that can pull thousands of tons of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere are starting to spin up.
Climeworks, a Swiss start-up, opened the biggest carbon absorbing plant in the world on May 8 in Hellisheidi, Iceland. Dubbed “Mammoth,” the plant is designed to remove 36,000 metric tons of carbon each year, the equivalent of taking 8,600 cars off the road.


10 steps you can take to lower your carbon footprint

That makes the new plant nine times bigger than the previous record-holder, the Climeworks “Orca” plant, which opened in Iceland in 2021 — though still tiny given the millions of tons of carbon experts say the world will need to pull out of the air to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius this century.

But Mammoth shows the industry is starting to grow beyond pilot plants and lab demonstrations. “It’s a drop in the bucket, but it’s a much bigger drop in the bucket than any we’ve seen so far,” said Klaus Lackner, who heads the Center for Negative Carbon Emissions at Arizona State University.

How Mammoth works​

The Climeworks Mammoth plant is basically a giant air filter. Fans pull air through a series of filters designed to catch stray CO2 molecules, which make up a tiny share of air’s mass — just 0.04 percent. Then, another company called Carbfix mixes the CO2 with water and pumps it deep underground, where it reacts with basalt rock and turns into stone.



The entire process runs on Iceland’s plentiful geothermal energy, so powering the machines doesn’t produce more carbon emissions. Outside scientists confirmed that the Climeworks Orca project and an earlier pilot plant really do remove carbon while producing very few emissions in a 2021 analysis published in Nature.
Climeworks then sells offsets based on that captured carbon. It doesn’t publicly say how much it charges its big corporate customers, including Microsoft, Shopify and Stripe, for the service — but it offers regular people carbon removal subscriptions at a price of $1,500 per metric ton of carbon removed. More than 20,000 people have signed up, according to the company’s website.
“The only people purchasing Climeworks removals at this point are very wealthy individuals or very wealthy companies that are … paying a lot of money to bring down the costs of what they see as a potential future industry,” said Rudy Kahsar, manager of carbon dioxide removal at the clean energy think tank RMI.


As more carbon removal plants pop up and get bigger, experts hope, the costs will fall closer to $100 per ton, which is the target price many start-ups are aiming for, Lackner said.
icon-climate.png

Follow Climate & environment
“$100 is tolerable,” he said. “The world can manage and afford it. At $1,000, they cannot.”

Bigger than Mammoth​

The record-breaking Mammoth plant may soon be dwarfed by much larger facilities set to open this decade. Next year, a subsidiary of the oil company Occidental Petroleum plans to open a plant in Texas capable of removing 500,000 metric tons of carbon per year — equivalent to emissions from 119,000 cars. Climeworks is designing another plant in Louisiana it says will capture 1 million tons of carbon annually by 2030. That’s 238,000 cars.


Experts say these early plants will play an important role in proving whether these machines work — and just how expensive and energy-hungry they will be.


“We need to show that these facilities can be done at a commercial scale so we can see that they work, that they’re [socially] accepted, that you can get financing for it,” said Kahsar. Mammoth “paves the way for other facilities to come behind it.”
Capturing carbon from the atmosphere remains controversial. Critics say the technology is an unrealistic distraction or an excuse to keep using fossil fuels. But a 2022 U.N. report concluded the world is so far behind on cutting greenhouse gas emissions that capturing at least some carbon is now “unavoidable” if humanity hopes to meet its climate goals.

“It’s not an excuse to do nothing,” said Eric Gimon, a senior fellow at the energy and climate policy think tank Energy Innovation. “We still need to be firing on all cylinders for everything else we need to do to decarbonize.”

Why do we need carbon capture?​

Although solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles and other established green technologies can cut most of the world’s greenhouse emissions, U.N. climate scientists predict there will be some stubborn emissions remaining by 2050 in sectors like air travel, shipping and steelmaking.

To meet key climate targets, the world may need to directly capture as much as 600 million tons of CO2 per year, according to the International Energy Agency, or as little as 20 million tons of CO2 per year, according to a 2022 report from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. That report notes there hasn’t been much research on the potential impact of direct air capture, which makes it hard to predict how big a role the technology will play in fighting climate change.
But the report predicts some amount of carbon capture will be necessary to offset whatever emissions remain.
“If we get stuck, and there’s a last few percent [of emissions] that’s really hard to do … we’ve got a way to take care of it,” Gimon said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT