It’s a little hyperbolic ;-) but I think you get the point.
You don’t really think what is going on is legal do you?
“We took down our Pride flags… I took out any books I thought would be incriminating.”
- Thread starter NorthernHawkeye
- Start date
It’s a little hyperbolic ;-) but I think you get the point.
You don’t really think what is going on is legal do you?
3 hours later and none of the usual suspects have touched this one. Pretty much says all that needs to be said.
They know the answer. Every damn one of them.
Not all Executive Branch employees and appointee need to be confirmed. In fact the Constitution speaks to this specific issue.
I don’t want to put word into your mouth, so explain to me your usage of the word illegal, and what specifically you think is illegal. Then, link to the Section is US criminal code in question.
If you can’t, and I know you can’t. Why do you keep repeating falsehoods? I don’t think you’re stupid. So why?
What’s illegal? Quit being disingenuous, and state specifically what is illegal and how it is illegal.
The Privacy Act isn’t germane if he has permission, which he obviously does.
Link to where he impounded Congressionally appropriated funds please and thanks.
You can’t link to that. But I’ll play as long as you’re willing to play. You won’t be willing to play long. Invariably people like you quit when they can’t find supporting documentation. And you can’t find it because it doesn’t exist. Which makes your assertion wrong. And you never stick around long enough when you’re proven wrong. You just move on to the next factless taking point. That you heard on television or read somewhere.
Good grief. There are three lawsuits already filed. And not by fly by night firms but top quality shops.
I suggest you read them.
This isn't what you think it is you bigoted douchecanoe
I will list them because you won’t read them or even try to find them:
Alliance for Retired Americans suit in DC Circuit
Violates APA - Count I
Violates APA - Count II
Excess of statutory authority - Count III
So you’re unable to answer the question. I’ve read the lawsuits. Point to where they suggest criminal wrongdoing.
You’ll be gone soon as I predicted, unable to provide any documentation. Off to your next fantastical talking point force fed by television or DU.
I think it’s pretty clear what transpired here. At least for those of us living in fact based reality, which right now is the majority of the country, and the minority on this echo chamber.
Public Citizen lawsuit in D. columbia
Violation of Federal Advisory Committee Act - Count I
Violation of Federal Advisory Committee Act - Count I
This doesn’t make your point. In fact it helps make my point.
You’re trying though. Lots of Google searches for you tonight.
I’m still waiting for any documentation you have that might validate any of your lies.
Link to any federal employee having those hanging in an office?
Imagine thinking that this is a flex. Punching down on people who have been marginalized their whole lives just for being different. And then going after the people who just want to support and protect them while doing their jobs so you can replace them with unqualified boot lickers. I can't even fathom what it takes to be so small of a person that not only would you support that, but you'd brag about it.
American Public Health Association lawsuit in D. Columbia
Violation of FACA - Count I, II, III, IV
Violation of FACA - Count I, II, III, IV
Still nothing of substance here. Link something that makes your previous statement true.
You can’t, but I’ll play as long as you’re willing to keep doing ineffectual Google searches.
He doesn’t have authority or permission. He hasn’t even been subjected to a background check
Not true. The POTUS can waive all of that.
If what you post is remotely true, and it’s not, why haven’t any of the suits that have been brought mentioned this?
Keep trying, or playing. Whatever you choose.
You’ve read the lawsuits and find nothing of substance. Well done. I guess we can all sleep soundly.
I liked you better when you logged in under your original user name back in the day.
I would disagree with you
When was being LGTBQ accepted by the majority of people. Didn’t people try to completely hide their lifestyle for decades if they were “different” from others?
If you were from the south in the 50’s or before could you openly support civil rights? Interracial marriage about anywhere in the US. Support of Native Americans?
Just a few really easy examples that today is way more tolerant than in our past.
Can you help me understand how this post makes your previous false posts accurate?
You should. We all should. I don’t want political flags hanging in a federal office.
What is inaccurate? Post where I said criminal. I’ll wait. You made the claim.
Attention whore?
My neighbor has an American flag flying from a flag pole in his front yard that says “Trump 2024” on it…is he an attention whore too? Is the American flag “defaced”? Where do you draw the line….if you do?
Musk became a US citizen in 2002
To be fair you didn’t say criminal. It’s hard to keep up with your nonsensical posts.
Above is your original post.
Link to the “raid”
Link to why Trump’s appointment of Musk doesn’t legally exist.
Link to why they’d need a warrant.
Link to why they’d need a (your words) a Congressional mandate.
We got off topic here, which matters more to you than it does to me, because your original statement are factually inaccurate and unproven. Your links are administrative violations. Potentially.
