And we wouldn’t have jazz!I'm glad Paul Revere didn't think like you.
And we wouldn’t have jazz!I'm glad Paul Revere didn't think like you.
Yeah, an exception. Allowing her to compete. I want to see the best of the best at the Olympics but like I said, I understand If that doesn’t happen
Did others test positive? Case by case ruling would be my call.So should all the others be given an exception?
So should all the others be given an exception?
His CAPS LOCK button must be stuck.Anyone take time to read that dudes Twitter? Yeah he's not mentally ill......
The Onion, per usual, NAILS IT.
The point of rules is so that you don’t have a million interpretations. Otherwise rules (needed rules) would be useless.You are being way too literal. The only point I have is I dislike scolds and narcs and people who say "just follow the rules" when the rule is CLEARLY asinine and pointless. In ANY situation - trivial or life-altering. That's all.
So her suspension ends July 27th, but the 1st round of the womens 100m is July 30th - why wouldnt she be eligible to run? 4x100 starts 8/5, so she'll definitely be running that it sounds like.
Don't disagree.The point of rules is so that you don’t have a million interpretations. Otherwise rules (needed rules) would be useless.
Nothing you say here is wrong, Except, those were the rules for the Olympics and if you want to participate then you need to follow them, no matter how stupid and pointless they are. This is really something that needs to be addressed by the Olympic Committee. Actually all leagues, for that matter. Does the NFL still ban players for marijuana?You are being way too literal. The only point I have is I dislike scolds and narcs and people who say "just follow the rules" when the rule is CLEARLY asinine and pointless. In ANY situation - trivial or life-altering. That's all.
She didn’t know her mom was dying - couldn’t plan for that.
Would be a lot more sympathy if she was some pretty white girl from Iowa.
But even more LOL at this response 😂
Two things that seem at odds can be true at the same time. It's a dumb rule considering there aren't any known performance enhancements from it, and it's dumb using it in a time period where you know you might get tested for it.
Then how does she get to run the relays? Does the country just pick the relay runners?Because her Olympic trial results are tossed out.
She's not on the team.
Depends. If you’re doing the marijuana I don’t see that as performance enhancing so idgaf if they make an exception to that rule.
Performance enhancers/steroids, nah fam
Your opinion. Others think differently.Yeah, I get that. And I'm not losing sleep over this chick's dilemma. That said, the righteous "If You Just Follow The Rules" lectures from scolds on an issue where the rule is as clearly asinine and stupid as this actually piss me off more than the alleged injustice. Like I said, Narcs and Hall Monitors are the SOTE in my book.
That is simpleton thinking, IMO.Your opinion. Others think differently.
Sorry, but it makes no difference whether a person thinks a rule is stupid or not. IT‘S THE RULE. PERIOD. END OF STORY. All she had to do is NOT toke up. Not hard.
"A second refill on your Pepsi? No, sir. You're cut off."
Preach. Amen, sir.That is simpleton thinking, IMO.
If everyone lived by that credo, we would still have slavery, women wouldn't vote, booze would be illegal, etc., etc.
In fact, I'd go so far as to argue that it is any individual's DUTY to actively work to repeal, replace and defy any rule that is anti-ethical, immoral or even downright pointless and stupid. That is how we advance our shared society.
You think I’m reading through the whole thread on the off chance someone might post something funny or clever?"A second refill on your Pepsi? No, sir. You're cut off."
Did anyone else think the 100 & 200 WRs happened in the 08 Olympics too?If Usain Bolt hadn’t run in the 2008 Olympics, it wouldn’t have changed anything for him. The guy actually laid down faster times in the following events.
Then how does she get to run the relays? Does the country just pick the relay runners?
They did, but WR’s can happen anywhere.Did anyone else think the 100 & 200 WRs happened in the 08 Olympics too?
I was specifically referring to Bolts WRs - I thought for sure they were at the 08 olympics, but they were at 09 Berlin gamesThey did, but WR’s can happen anywhere.
In removing Richardson, they’re pulling the only person within a tenth of Fraser-Price.
It’s either going to be a slow race or a boring one.
That is simpleton thinking, IMO.
If everyone lived by that credo, we would still have slavery, women wouldn't vote, booze would be illegal, etc., etc.
In fact, I'd go so far as to argue that it is any individual's DUTY to actively work to repeal, replace and defy any rule that is anti-ethical, immoral or even downright pointless and stupid. That is how we advance our shared society.
Skarate up, torbee. Sometimes you have to get into good trouble. And, be willing to handle the consequences of said action.That is simpleton thinking, IMO.
If everyone lived by that credo, we would still have slavery, women wouldn't vote, booze would be illegal, etc., etc.
In fact, I'd go so far as to argue that it is any individual's DUTY to actively work to repeal, replace and defy any rule that is anti-ethical, immoral or even downright pointless and stupid. That is how we advance our shared society.
I bet you're fun at partiesYour opinion. Others think differently.
Sorry, but it makes no difference whether a person thinks a rule is stupid or not. IT‘S THE RULE. PERIOD. END OF STORY. All she had to do is NOT toke up. Not hard.