Dude, you were wrong and the Big Ten office proved you were wrong by fining Gard. WTF is wrong with you?No, I'm just smart enough to see that weak ass punishment was PR.
You really this slow?
Could the NCAA apply a separate penalty, suspending from NCAA tournament participation? That seems fair, given how egregious was his conduct.Five game suspension and what works out to a day and a half of his annual salary for striking a coach from another team. What exactly does he have to do to get fired?
Probably the best thing jbo’s ever put on twitter. Also, probably the best thing from twitter you’ve posted on here 😆
Interesting. It says that "Neither coach Gard nor his staff had any intent to provoke or incite any of what took place". Maybe that's where the accountability came to light?
What, a days pay? That'd be like fining you $50.....Dude, you were wrong and the Big Ten office proved you were wrong by fining Gard. WTF is wrong with you?
Very objective, well done breakdown.A great breakdown and some angles and discussion I missed before. Up next...a grassy knoll video...
You are incapable of admitting you are wrong. He got fined, doesn’t matter the amount, the league said he played a part in it. If Gard had zero responsibility, like you stated, then Gard wouldn’t have gotten anything.What, a days pay? That'd be like fining you $50.....
Good point, I wonder, does that include the practice days, meetings, etc. leading up to each suspended game or just the game? Shouldn't he have to turn in his keys to the building, no contact order in place for the time spanning the 5 game...to give the suspension some teeth? The man should not be allowed to coach while suspended!Five game suspension and what works out to a day and a half of his annual salary for striking a coach from another team. What exactly does he have to do to get fired?
I don't like wiscy, but this is totally on michigan...Reading what the Wisconsin AD has been putting out regarding this situation is just garbage. He's exonerated Gard of any responsibility and now says the university will pay the fine. That's not completely out of line, but it is the language of his releases that really bother me. No wonder Davidson and Gard operate the way they do.
The B1G commissioner/office disagrees with you.I don't like wiscy, but this is totally on michigan...
That's why he didn't get suspended? OK lmaoThe B1G commissioner/office disagrees with you.
Gard's actions with no punch from Howard seem assertive but not what I would call overly aggressive. You would not bat an eye in isolation. Any punishment seems like a rationalizion to counter the horrible over reaction from Howard.Gard deserved some type of punishment and he got it.
What do you expect from an outstanding wrestler and a guy that cleared the way for Ron Dayne's Heisman?Reading what the Wisconsin AD has been putting out regarding this situation is just garbage. He's exonerated Gard of any responsibility and now says the university will pay the fine. That's not completely out of line, but it is the language of his releases that really bother me. No wonder Davidson and Gard operate the way they do.
they are turibul.The B1G commissioner/office disagrees with you.
The fine was probably for having no culpability. People who have done nothing wrong get fined all the time…… said no one ever.That's why he didn't get suspended? OK lmao
If it had been reversed it would have been raciest and Turgeon would have been fired after 1 million protesters protested....When the man says "I'll kill you" to Turgeon, that strikes me as a bit more than a "tussle." The man has serious anger issues and the Commissioner needs to deal with it before it gets even worse.
This was an attempt by Wisconsin to exonerate Gard from having any part in the altercation. As if they should protect him from an injustice passed down from the B1G office. The B1G office has the final say not Wisconsin, this is another display of Wisconsin arrogance. As if, they are more powerful, and more just than the B1G.
"The path to hell is paved with good intentions". And I am not convinced Gard had good intentions at all. He thought he was going to school Howard on how to behave or coach in the B1G, tell him the way it is, like Howard doesn't already know how to coach. Its a common theme in Wisconsin basketball, they never do anything wrong, arrogance galore.Interesting. It says that "Neither coach Gard nor his staff had any intent to provoke or incite any of what took place". Maybe that's where the accountability came to light?
Gard triggered it, did you see the whole thing? Howard was going through the line and Gard stopped Howard. I don't think he's blameless in this.
He may know how to coach but he has no class...like Howard he doesn't allready know how to coach.
I agree. To me, that word "intent" in the University's statement was huge because it implies that Gard and his staff did indeed have a negative role in the fracas."The path to hell is paved with good intentions". And I am not convinced Gard had good intentions at all. He thought he was going to school Howard on how to behave or coach in the B1G, tell him the way it is, like Howard doesn't already know how to coach. Its a common theme in Wisconsin basketball, they never do anything wrong, arrogance galore.
Gard’s action is not questioned for 1 second had Howard not thrown a punch.Gard's actions with no punch from Howard seem assertive but not what I would call overly aggressive. You would not bat an eye in isolation. Any punishment seems like a rationalizion to counter the horrible over reaction from Howard.
Gard's action and Howard's response are the same event...one does not happen without the other. Both deserve to be punished. Gard should have passed on by when he clearly saw that Howard had no interest in talking with him. Gard's presumption of Howard's respect an interest in what he had to say was clearly his error. Why he stood in Howard's path and engage in a verbal battle is beyond me.Gard’s action is not questioned for 1 second had Howard not thrown a punch.
While I don't totally disagree, if you're going to follow the chain of events don't you also have to include Howard's "I'll remember that TO" comment. None of it would have happened without that.Gard's action and Howard's response are the same event...one does not happen without the other. Both deserve to be punished. Gard should have passed on by when he clearly saw that Howard had no interest in talking with him. Gard's presumption of Howard's respect an interest in what he had to say was clearly his error. Why he stood in Howard's path and engage in a verbal battle is beyond me.
He didn't "grab" his elbow. He tried to stop him to continue talking.Maybe he should be. He is the one who grabbed Howards elbow. Had he just said good game and walked on there never would have been an escalation of things.
Would absolutely love if Wisconsin paid the fine for him and the Big Ten still showed a balance due with interest. A big thanks for the donation but this was a fine for your coach. He needs to pay it.This was an attempt by Wisconsin to exonerate Gard from having any part in the altercation. As if they should protect him from an injustice passed down from the B1G office. The B1G office has the final say not Wisconsin, this is another display of Wisconsin arrogance. As if, they are more powerful, and more just than the B1G.
Gard had a part in the altercation, Gard was wrong, Gard was punished and fined, it should have endded there.
By holding his elbow and stepping in front of Howard to talk to him then.He didn't "grab" his elbow. He tried to stop him to continue talking.
I would agree. Howard, and the reaction to him, by Gard is all related to what goes on in the games. So far, Gard and Turgeon have had the nerve/audacity to actually call Howard out on his nonsense coaching of the opponent's team during games. In 2021, the Iowa bench nearly got into it with Michigan's bench during a timeout in the game at Ann Arbor. If you watch games, Howard is talking to the other team just about the entire game. And coaches don't like the other team's coach trying to coach their own players. It spilled out last year in the Maryland-Michigan game when Turgeon had enough of Howard yelling stuff at the Maryland team during a timeout. Right before Turgeon and Howard get into it, you can see Turgeon gesture toward the ref who is standing right there, as if to say "are you hearing this?" The ref did nothing, so Turgeon tells Howard to shut up and Howard responds with he's going to kill Turgeon. Very mature stuff.While I don't totally disagree, if you're going to follow the chain of events don't you also have to include Howard's "I'll remember that TO" comment. None of it would have happened without that.
I am curious though, knowing Howard's temper do you think nothing would have happened if Gard just kept walking and responded "Thanks, f#!# off!"?