ADVERTISEMENT

Close friend pleading with me to not vaccinate our baby

Joes Place: “If you skip any recommended vaccination for any reason except a legit medical one, you are "anti-vax" by definition.”

sciencedirect.com: “Vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 have consistently been shown to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 disease. However, uptake of boosters has stalled in the United States at less than 20% of the eligible population.”

Joes Place: “The majority are not (anti-vax).”

Talk about living in denial.
🤡 😂 🤡 😂 🤡 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
My wife and I got the 80's schedule, DTP, Polio, MMR. My kids, nada. They are much, much healthier than the vaccinated kids in the extended family and it's not even close. No speech delay. No ADDHD. No allergies to anything whatsoever. They've had like 5 earaches among the two and maybe 2 pink eyes and some colds. Mentally they are extremely sharp. The vaccinated kids have had a lot more health issues, speech delay, ADDHD, allergies, get sick much more often and for some of them, mentally they are not all there. That's just my experience, and I read and see interviews of parents who see the exact same thing all the time.

Oh but I'm sure it's nothing.

These people and their vaccines trying to push them on people who know better and don't want them can go F themselves.

Should have made them safe to begin with.
Patients suffering effects very similar in both post-covid AND post-vaccination timelines.

Funny thing is they failed to mention if the two post-covid subjects were also injected. Because that would be extremely relevant to the study re: all the previous red flags around immune enhancement and mRNA technology.

 
Patients suffering effects very similar in both post-covid AND post-vaccination timelines.

Funny thing is they failed to mention if the two post-covid subjects were also injected. Because that would be extremely relevant to the study re: all the previous red flags around immune enhancement and mRNA technology.

Ergo: If you have a reaction to the vaccine, you'll have a WAY WORSE reaction to the virus.

That's what has been presented to you months and months ago.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Good job Joe I think you got it. Now that the majority of folks are anti-vax, YOU'RE the one in the minority.
Excuse Me What GIF by StickerGiant
 
Zero? You know better than that Joe. You've been presented many of these multiple times. Some of these studies deal with the list of diseases I outlined. Some do not. If you'll scroll through them, I'm sure you'll find SOME data.

Oh look…the study ‘missed’ some dangerous side effects of a proposed new drug.

I’m sure the FDA will take a serious look into that before they rubber stamp its approval.

Subjects in the studies told The Wall Street Journal that their thoughts of suicide worsened during or after testing, but their downward slides weren’t captured in trial data and therefore not reflected in the final results.

 
Only idiots go to college nowadays.

I'm kidding. Mostly.
You're not because we know you really believe it. Even though it's still a fact that college grads make way way more money than non college grads. People like you still think they're getting indoctrinated in leftism.
 
You are (re)posting a pseudo-science site run by Kennedy and his buddies.

Nothing on that site has any merit.
Yeah, I'm giving a disinformation site with zero legitimate scientific evidence the attention it deserves, which is none. Anything RFK Jr touches, as it relates to science or (specifically) vaccines is bunk.
RFK didn't do the studies, boyz. You've seen the studies and Joe you lied about never seeing them. They're legit. They're exactly what I said they were. You lose again. Thanks for playing.
 
Another rando video.

They cannot debate folks like Hotez in the publication arena (where you have to post actual facts and links to your analysis), so they have to resort to misleading videos.
Hotez is the biggest pussy. He knows his dumb ass would be backed into a corner in front of a world-wide audience and of course he and pharma can't afford that so he has to puss out. Any of my boys would gladly debate him and have offered him what, 100K + to do so but he realizes his position is weak and he'd get exposed. Obviously if his position was solid he would debate and at least attempt to put this movement he hates so much to bed.
 
Last edited:
This seems like a distraction from your claim you have "studies" to post.
That seems like a distraction from Hotez being a pussy, and the fact that nobody from your camp seems to want to debate, even when offered enormous sums of money. If they corner the market on truth, then debate it out. Very simple.

Here are a few publications:

 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
That seems like a distraction from Hotez being a pussy, and the fact that nobody from your camp seems to want to debate, even when offered enormous sums of money. If they corner the market on truth, then debate it out. Very simple.

Here are a few publications:


Pick 1 or 2 you "like" that you think prove your point, and let's discuss.

Not going thru a grocery list of nonsense from Anti-vax websites that post garbage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
Pick 1 or 2 you "like" that you think prove your point, and let's discuss.

Not going thru a grocery list of nonsense from Anti-vax websites that post garbage.
Joe, you said ZERO data. Now you're getting data (as you did before), and you're still not happy.
 
Those are "anecdotes", not "studies".

And, regarding the "autism" claims, I've posted for you at least 6 times now that childhood infections are directly related to ASD, not vaccines.
It's the vaccines, bub.

And by the way, I thought you couldn't prove it's NOT the vaccines. Why do we keep going back and forth on this?
 
It's the vaccines, bub.

And by the way, I thought you couldn't prove it's NOT the vaccines.
You CAN prove there is no correlation. Which has been done.

There HAS been a CLEAR correlation between early childhood infections and ASD.
Which I've posted for you multiple times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
I stand by that.

Pick 2 you like and we'll see what the "data" actually tell us.
Or I'll pick them.
I presented some peer reviewed publications for you, a list that is by no means exhaustive. There are some publications that I know once existed and google seems to have buried them, conveniently. Feel free to offer your opinions on 2 or all of them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT