Found this on page 5 of the 2025 Project concerning porn
- Thread starter Huey Grey
- Start date
Define important. Would your quality of life be deeply impacted by losing either one of these?
And there we have the difference between conservative and liberal in a nutshell.
I think parts of it will. The stuff they can do with an executive order. The whole thing?? I really doubt it.
The social conservative stuff, Trump isn't going to shut off Newsmax for that shit. Most he will do is sign a piece of paper.
Now all bets are off if we have the enabling acts passed.
Not sure I understand. How does the mechanics of a good compromise correlate to political ideology?
Huh? You asked for a definition of “important.”
I gave it to you in the simplest of terms.
Important = non-negotiables
The question was "Would your quality of life be deeply impacted by losing either one of these?"
Now do Airbus
And how many fewer fatal crashes due to Quality Systems shortcuts...
Well that depends. Are we dealing in the world of hypotheticals or just in general?
Project 2025. Keep up. Not to mention filibuster in Senate. Same reason Democrats couldn’t pass voting laws. It’s like you guys flush basic politics whenever you need to push a narrative. We have to teach you the same things over and over.
No. You’re in favor of banning freedoms you don’t like just like we keep telling you. I think there’s one thing I want to get rid of…assault rifles that are designed to KILL vast majority of humans, so maybe we don’t have to do active shooter drills with little kids. Huge difference in those and everything else you want to “limit”.
Bro, chill.
I know Trump is the boogey-man to you but that stuff ain’t going to happen. Stop falling for the panic-porn.
Lest we forget we have already survived 4 years of Trump featuring 2 years of a red Congress…..and Democracy lives on.
Go for a walk, read a book, have a beer.
It’s gonna be OK. If your happiness depends on who is in the White House then I feel bad for you.
Projection. Stop gaslighting. None of us are falling for Republican BS. I see how they vote and what they announce that they want. Project 2025 tells us. You don’t care because you agree with it. Again, it’s anti-American.
That show was hilarious until the dogcrap last season. They tried it in the US and it just didn’t work here…probably because people like dragon were upset. We barely got NYPD Blue because of these same freedoms fighters.
Projection. Clearly you’re the uptight one…trying to take things away you don’t like.
Darn…I never encountered any horny female teachers back in my school days. 😜
None, actually.
Pornhub: Now Illegal in TX
Ts & Ps, folks https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/14/texas-pornhub-5th-circuit-age-verification-paxton
iowa.forums.rivals.com
No depends. If you had no porn, handguns, or semi-automatic weapons would your daily life be impacted in any significant way?
I mostly agree, although it is a first amendment issue at all 3 levels. But just because something is a first amendment issue doesn't mean it can't be regulated.
Distributors are the easiest to target since they are right in the middle. So you require distributors to have signed consent and a copy of a photo ID for everyone that appears in any content. The consent form attests not only to their consent but also attests that they were over 18 at the time of creation.
On top of that you create some sort of barrier that distributors have to implement in order to prove that consumers are of age. It's not going to be perfect but the idea is to make it a little harder for curious children. The rest is up to parents. Ideally we also want to address privacy concerns too. The government doesn't need to keep any logs of this.
As far as trafficking, I think any individual who is in a lot of content, could potentially visit with or talk to a government employee at least once a year in a private room where they can attest that everything they are doing and have been doing was done willingly and under no duress. That person or people have to be non judgemental but also make it very clear that they can and will help that person if they are under any duress. Doesn’t have to be a long meeting but it's a time where that person can be physically separated from everyone else and they can have the opportunity if they need it in a secure building to say that they need help or protection from someone.
Me personally? Nope. But it’s not up to just me.
In your scenario, are you attempting to equate pron with all handguns and semi-automatics? Are single shot rifles exempt in this case? Shotguns OK?
I suppose if I am a hunter the case could be made that a material impact would be the result.
Im equating 1st and second amendment rights. Exactly like I said. Handguns and semiautomatics are only allowed in the hands of law enforcement and the military. Hunters, skeet shooters and target practice guys still have as many options as they need available to them. How is anyone except the s
purveyors of death impacted negatively?
Last edited:
This is like saying all Democrats are with Antifa. Gimme a break. Not once has Trump or Vance supported or talked about Project 2025.
Works for me. It will never pass but I personally could settle for it. Just gotta convince another 100 million or so Americans and you got a deal.
I think if we could keep the lobbyists and shills out of the discussion it would pass in a heartbeat. I'm certain there are already well over 100 million that agree in principle. We could call it the bill to save lives and souls. A national referendum to kick it off.
The problem today is our politics are completely broken.
I thought the author of it spoke at the convention this week?
Actually, guns actually kill families. A gun in the home significantly increases the chances that someone in that home will be killed with that gun.
No; you tried to claim Boeing was safe. I asked you to compare to their primary competitor.
You refuse to do that - probably looked it up and what you found contradicted your point.
