In a nutshell Connor directs the team and orchestrates the defense.I'm curious as well. What does he do so well to make up for all his other downfalls?
In a nutshell Connor directs the team and orchestrates the defense.I'm curious as well. What does he do so well to make up for all his other downfalls?
Connor is much liked the Iowa QB's that Kirk picks to play for him. It's the guy that's not going to lose the game for you. Coaches play the guys they have the most confidence in down the stretch of games. It's all about trust...Sorry but you would not understand. You believe shooting is the only bb skill that matters. In a nutshell Connor directs the team and orchestrates the defense. If you can’t see that then you don’t understand. Sorry.
I think they would have been quad two neutral or at home just not on the road. They don't seem like a team that will age well in the big ten.Will they remain a Quad 3 for the rest of the year or is that just where they are right now? Serious question.
Do you think assists are important to a successful basketball team? How about getting us into the proper sets? How about directing our motion offense and making the tweaks that are necessary to find good shots? Is it important to recognize what type of defense is being played by the other team? If they are pressing, where will the traps come? How should we space the floor to defeat the press? If a player flashes in the Post who throws them the perfect pass, or if not open who chooses to not pass into the post? Connor does all those things very very well. It does not show up on the scoreboard, which is how most people judge players. it is ridiculous in my view.I hear you on Hawk haters needing to chill. That being said, Connor shouldn't be in the game over Kris, Toussaint, Perkins, Ulis and probably not Sandfort either. He's not a great defender and he adds nothing on the offensive side of the ball. It's ridiculous that he got more minutes than Joe last night. At best, he should be the 10th man off the bench.
all players do those things. You can't point to a metric that shows he does it better. He may communicate better than others, he should he's been there 5 years. That in and of itself does not trump actual play.Do you think assists are important to a successful basketball team? How about getting us into the proper sets? How about directing our motion offense and making the tweaks that are necessary to find good shots? Is it important to recognize what type of defense is being played by the other team? If they are pressing, where will the traps come? How should we space the floor to defeat the press? If a player flashes in the Post who throws them the perfect pass, or if not open who chooses to not pass into the post? Connor does all those things very very well. It does not show up on the scoreboard, which is how most people judge players. it is ridiculous in my view.
Nothing wrong with his boys playing almost double the minutes of Tony and Kris!Nepotism is pronounced in both high profile Iowa sports teams
Ridiculous in my view is how you think you have to explain it to us like we don't understand basketball. What you don't understand is that CMac Isn't some court general extraordinaire. He is an absolute liabilty that brings pretty much nothing to the court... you're just seeing what you want to see. The fact he is taking minutes and learning experience away from clearly superior younger players is the only thing thats ridiculous.Do you think assists are important to a successful basketball team? How about getting us into the proper sets? How about directing our motion offense and making the tweaks that are necessary to find good shots? Is it important to recognize what type of defense is being played by the other team? If they are pressing, where will the traps come? How should we space the floor to defeat the press? If a player flashes in the Post who throws them the perfect pass, or if not open who chooses to not pass into the post? Connor does all those things very very well. It does not show up on the scoreboard, which is how most people judge players. it is ridiculous in my view.
100% no FR the last minute or two if we're winningI'd rather have a capable FT shooter like Kris than Rebraca. Filip is a little better rebounder but it isn't like he's Rodman.
He has to start hitting his free throws or you can't have him in there at the end of a tight game.100% no FR the last minute or two if we're winning
The majority of what you stated is the job of the coach. I still don't see what you see that Connor does so well to garner playing time over Joe, Kris, Perkins and Ulis. You make it sound like Connor doesn't make any mistakes and plays perfectly. He doesn't. If Fran wasn't his father, I highly doubt Connor would be playing the minutes he's getting.Do you think assists are important to a successful basketball team? How about getting us into the proper sets? How about directing our motion offense and making the tweaks that are necessary to find good shots? Is it important to recognize what type of defense is being played by the other team? If they are pressing, where will the traps come? How should we space the floor to defeat the press? If a player flashes in the Post who throws them the perfect pass, or if not open who chooses to not pass into the post? Connor does all those things very very well. It does not show up on the scoreboard, which is how most people judge players. it is ridiculous in my view.
I looked. There are only 5 possible combinations with 20 possessions and 4 of those had Connor on them. Just by random chance he had a 80% chance of making the best lineup. The 4 and 5 man lineups most people are clamoring for don’t show up because Fran has refused to play them for many possessions.Analytics are very helpful in evaluating a team and its players.
According to EvanMiya.com, Iowa's best five-man lineup that has played at least 20 possessions with each other is Murray, Connor, JBO, Rebraca and Joe T.
The most efficient four-man lineup with at least 40 possessions played together is Connor, Murray, Rebraca, and Toussaint.
This analyst sees it the way I do. Go argue with him I guess.
![]()
In fact, Conner showed up in the bottom 3 5-man lineups and 7 of the bottom 10 4-man lineups according to your criteria…I looked. There are only 5 possible combinations with 20 possessions and 4 of those had Connor on them. Just by random chance he had a 80% chance of making the best lineup. The 4 and 5 man lineups most people are clamoring for don’t show up because Fran has refused to play them for many possessions.
They have lots of potential and upside, but I don't know if it was just me, but they were so stagnant standing around on offense at times. and the transition D stunk.I have no idea but I think this Maryland team has a lot of upside. Manning has them playing looser and running the court more. Their transition defense was pretty poor and if Danny can shore that up they have the talent to be pretty good. But man, it is a tough league.
Waiting for his reply still?1. Why did you sit Joe the last 8 minutes of the game?
2. Why did you play Connor the last 13:30 of the game?
I’m glad we won but this may be one of the worst coaches games I’ve ever witnessed. I’m touching the tip of the iceberg…
Is that the stretch where Keegan scored 25 of 30 points…?Analytics are very helpful in evaluating a team and its players.
According to EvanMiya.com, Iowa's best five-man lineup that has played at least 20 possessions with each other is Murray, Connor, JBO, Rebraca and Joe T.
The most efficient four-man lineup with at least 40 possessions played together is Connor, Murray, Rebraca, and Toussaint.
This analyst sees it the way I do. Go argue with him I guess.
![]()
I don’t see how Connor is any better at #3 deep in any of the 5 spots, and is probably #4 PG and #5 SGI just checked that thread that Gunner started and he literally left Connor out of his entire 12 man lineup 😂😂😂😂😂 wait til some of these dudes read it
Joe plays hard and has 9pts, 9 assist, 4 rebounds, and 3 steals. Shooting 50% from the floor and his night is done with 8 and a half minutes left in the game. He has played well with Ulis in the few times they have played together, he shooting 90% from the feet throw line this year, and he's had one game winning shot his year. And Conner plays the last 13 minutes, with 1 point, 1 assist and 1 steal.
I said in another thread at the beginning of the year Kris needed 25 minutes a game to be ready for the Big Ten season. That hasn't happened and now he seems to have a quick hook like Joe.
I hope potential recruits don't notice what seems to be obvious.
Best post on this thread so far.Couple of things…
*Don’t assume that because you don’t understand the rotations that there is something wrong with them.
*I am really glad some of you bb geniuses don’t coach our team.
*Fran actually explained his thinking on rotations in the post game.
*The Ulis/Perkins duo is our best defensive combo. Fran has confidence in them.
*Connor wins a lot of games for us. Really sorry some of you cannot see this.
*Hawks won a tight game last night. Good play and good coaching decisions down the stretch got us the win. If you cannot see that then you are blind!
We won last night despite both Patrick and Kris playing about as bad as they have this year. Fran was smart enough to get them both off the court for the last 10 min or so, and maybe Patrick should have sat even earlier, because he was awful on both ends. That had a lot to do with why Keegan played almost the whole game, and why Connor played all of the closing minutes. Keegan, JoeT, and Rebraca had maybe their best games of the year. Weren't a few of the whiners on the board knocking JoeT and Rebraca this past week?
This was a badly needed win, and I don't understand why so many want to blame Fran for anything that doesn't go well, but never give him credit for the positives. I think Mary Land has some very talented players, although they don't seem to be very deep. As you keep bitching, ask yourself who gave scholarships to Keegan and Kris, while no other major programs were interested? Who pulled JoeT out of NY?
Let's beat the &*#(ing Badgers!
kinda short lineup.Should have been Joe, JBO, Ulis, Keegan, Kris at the end of the game.
Pretty much agree with all of this. I was poking at those folks who evaluate players based on their last game or two, without looking at the big picture. JoeT was on the crap list heading into the Mary Land game, and now he is all-B1G... I am glad we have both JoeT and Ulis, and adding Dix, Iowa should be loaded next year at PG for the first time in a long time.Totally agree with you that we needed the win, that’s what’s most important. However there’s not just blame being asserted here, there’s plenty of logical discussion and questions of the tactics Fran used being raised, rightfully so. Just because we won, doesn’t waive the right to be critiqued or criticized for certain moves/strategies in game. That’s the nature of the beast. I’m not going to be an apologist for Fran, or sit here and not raise questions on a board specifically used for just that, when I’m curious what other people take away.
Kris hasn’t had hardly a sniff at the #3 spot in quite some time, ans is often on the floor with both Pmac and Keegan now the last 3 or 4 games since he went off at Utah State? Seemingly playing the 5 to relieve Rebraca. He looks a bit lost at times and either is hesitant on defense or is fouling too quickly benching himself like he did against western Illinois. I almost wonder if he still has a nagging injury because he was wearing an ankle brace last night. Patrick was pretty abysmal, good of Fran to keep them both on the bench actually since they were poor I agree he should have taken Patrick out sooner too.
I guess my gripe is why do you take out the guard who is the hottest on the floor on both ends, for doing nothing wrong? Maybe he puts him back out there, maybe he dribbled too much for the defense they were playing, idk. I just found it odd because joe was on fire. Then second It just didn’t add up to me (previous reasons stated) why Cmac played so long? I mean he did a couple nice things on D, but also got dominated by bigger post players 2 times isolated I remember, didn’t gather multiple rebounds, missed the back end of a 1 and 1, when the game was tight (it happens) and missed another open 3. Scoring isn’t all that matters, but I think it’s playing with fire when you keep at 4v5 for sn extended time period, especially with the injuries he’s had, and the back problems he’s facing. He’s a tough kid, so he’s always gonna try and go out there and play hard for us, that’s what I like about him, but Idk if he is our best option. Kinda like him, CJ, and Jordan all playing hurt against Oregon, and then Wiesy going down too. It reflected in the score. It didn’t matter how connected we were on D that game if he’s physically not fit to go. Just a question that came accross my mind.
Fran was the first to offer the Murray’s and they accepted before any other programs could offer outside of Western Illinois (I think it was, without looking), but they both had about 40 Division 1 programs showing interest and had unofficial offers and phone calls, meetings etc. set up after their year at DME, Kenyons stated on the board before. And I think Fran and his staff are great recruiters, I think they are honestly held back by Barta more than anything. Frans done great with having Garza, making the tournament, winning 20+ games, yet our facilities are pretty shit, we are geographically in a small city with harsh winters, and honestly carver isn’t a great environment compared to other appealing P5 schools. Barta needs to get more stud nets to come, let em in free, renovate the facilities and maybe we will land some more recruits. But Owen freeman was a good get, so were Bowen and Dix. Hope they all pan out.
Kevin Boyle was a solid player who did a little bit of everything, but wasn't great at anything. He (and anyone) was a much better player, when playing with Ronnie Lester and Kenny Arnold in the backcourt. When he became "the man" his senior year, it was a lot harder.I would in no way compare Boyle with Connor. My memory of Boyle was a very good player. Just checked and he averaged over 10 ppg, 49% fg, 71% FT, 5.7 rb. And these include a bad senior year. I don't know for sure, but I think he must have been hurt, as he took half as many shots. Did more digging and he only played the last 2 games his senior year.
I would in no way compare Boyle with Connor. My memory of Boyle was a very good player. Just checked and he averaged over 10 ppg, 49% fg, 71% FT, 5.7 rb. And these include a bad senior year. I don't know for sure, but I think he must have been hurt, as he took half as many shots. Did more digging and he only played the last 2 games his senior y