Some interesting twists on reality by some posters here. First, Eno was not let go for taking a visit, he was let go for hiding it and subsequently lying about it. The other two had nothing to do with visits, nor did this one.
As far as hypocrisy goes....it may be perceived that way, but the reality is that it's not really. Iowa will not continue to pursue a kid who says "I'm not interested, I'm committed to this school and done with recruiting". If they say they're still open to talking, Iowa will continue to work with them.
Similarly, if Iowa knows that a commit is still out looking around, they're probably going to have a discussion with them about their level of "commitment". They are up front with recruits that they don't want them to commit until they're at that "don't bother me, my recruitment is closed" point.
Those two aspects are in complete alignment. Our expectations of our commits matches how we treat other school's "commits".
I don't have a problem with that. The real problem is that kids are expected to commit before they're eligible to take official visits. The NCAA needs a system that prevents kids from committing before they can take officials. The answer, IMO, is to allow them officials starting their junior year.