So, then you’re not really a full-fledged lib?Before some asshat asks where are the libs standing up to this. Here I am, saying it's not right to have a biological male competing with females.
So, then you’re not really a full-fledged lib?Before some asshat asks where are the libs standing up to this. Here I am, saying it's not right to have a biological male competing with females.
Choke on a dick.So, then you’re not really a full-fledged lib?
My concern is if you believe in God, God doesn't get things wrong. He made this individual as a female. Period. Female anatomy throughout. There is no question about her gender (even though some here think there is). She has not been dominant, she has won more than lost but its not as if she has an unfair advantage. So the real question is why so many including you got your panties in a bunch rather then defending another female. Now you are having to backtrack. This is the individual you have wanted to defend for the last 3-4 years, yet now you are unwilling to defend a female. As to a transitioned individual, I agree they should not be competing in the Olympics.You - as per usual - are such an a-hole.
I asked because I hadn’t read anything that answered those questions - but thank you for determining that I’m stupid.
I still do not think that a transitioned person retaining the XY should compete in athletics against XX persons. Their bone structure and mass will always be that of an XY.
That’s my stupid opinion and I’m not alone in that.
I think this is the part where I tell you to GFY?
Do you still stand by this post, and not defend one of your fellow females.The women as a group should have refused to even get in the damn ring with the men.
And bone structure etc.
No. Look at that jaw, that's a large, feminine jaw, look at the dude in the boxing photo, notice the bone density and structural difference?
Some would say Serena had more masculinity and bone structures more similar to a male. Would you disqualify her? You are going down a very slippery slope.
My concern is if you believe in God, God doesn't get things wrong. He made this individual as a female. Period. Female anatomy throughout. There is no question about her gender (even though some here think there is). She has not been dominant, she has won more than lost but its not as if she has an unfair advantage. So the real question is why so many including you got your panties in a bunch rather then defending another female. Now you are having to backtrack. This is the individual you have wanted to defend for the last 3-4 years, yet now you are unwilling to defend a female. As to a transitioned individual, I agree they should not be competing in the Olympics.
My experiance as well.I lean left, as do most of the people I spend time with, and I've never spoken to a single person on this subject that believes former men should be in women's athletics.
I'm not saying there aren't people out there that are not in favor of it, but I don't hear a loud voice in favor for it.
LOLWUT?Now realize Williams has 30 pounds on the boxers.
What is a DSD? The condition causing controversy at the Olympics
Debates on DSD in sport comes after Imane Khelif, who was banned from a previous tournament after failing a gender assessment was given the greenlight to compete at this year's games.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well she….had balls and xy chrimosomes
Is your transphobia so bad that now you are attacking cis women that don't fit your "athletic standard?"No. Look at that jaw, that's a large, feminine jaw, look at the dude in the boxing photo, notice the bone density and structural difference?
Now realize Williams has 30 pounds on the boxers.
Thatsamanbaby.gif
Thank you for letting me.know you didn't take any time to read the back and forth between jumping in the middle.of a conversation.LOLWUT?
There are boxing "weight classes", Cletus.
What trans phobia?Is your transphobia so bad that now you are attacking ciswomen that don't fit your "athletic standard?"
It's been stated that she's cis. You're still going on about how she's male or trans. There's something going on here with you and I doubt it has much to do with fairness.What trans phobia?
I’m not sure she’s Cis. I think this whole situation sucks for anyone involved. If she has indescended testicles and produces testosterone like a man, and has XY chromosomes…..but a vagina….i feel bad for her. I feel bad for women with ovaries? Who have to fight herIs your transphobia so bad that now you are attacking cis women that don't fit your "athletic standard?"
read more. This person is the reason these conversations should happen but they won't because of all the dudes who muddled the waters before her.It's been stated that she's cis. You're still going on about how she's male or trans. There's something going on here with you and I doubt it has much to do with fairness.
Pretty dumb, they are not trans, they have an actual medical condition that should be alloted serious conversations. The problem this person has is all the dumb trans issues that have muddled the water in front of her.
Pretty dumb, they are not trans, they have an actual medical condition that should be alloted serious conversations. The problem this person has is all the dumb trans issues that have muddled the water in front of her.
The first sentence of that article is incorrect.What is a DSD? The condition causing controversy at the Olympics
Debates on DSD in sport comes after Imane Khelif, who was banned from a previous tournament after failing a gender assessment was given the greenlight to compete at this year's games.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well she….had balls and xy chrimosomes
Hmmm, maybe they were going on the xy chromosomeThe first sentence of that article is incorrect.
"Differences in sex development (DSD) have become a central point of controversy at this year's Olympics after 'biological male' Algerian boxer Imane Khelif beat an opponent in the women's boxing event."
Perhaps a right-wing tabloid isn't the best source to quote when attempting to prove a point.
I know you REALLY want this chick to be a dude, you've made that very clear. But just because that's what you want, doesn't mean that's how it is. I generally like you on here, but you've been very weird in this thread, man.Hmmm, maybe they were going on the xy chromosome
This seems to be the equivalent of my dna being white, but having a condition that causes hyperpigmentation, and getting scholarships designated for an African American. Not my fault, not her fault either, but it’s not rightHmmm, maybe they were going on the xy chromosome
Hmmm, maybe they were going on the xy chromosome
Well, at least you spelled it correctly this time. But again - what proof do you have that she's xy?Hmmm, maybe they were going on the xy chromosome
No it's more like the equivalent of my dna being white, but having a condition that causes hyperpigmentation, and not getting to play in my sport because they don't allow African Americans to play. Not my fault, not her fault either, but it’s not rightThis seems to be the equivalent of my dna being white, but having a condition that causes hyperpigmentation, and getting scholarships designated for an African American. Not my fault, not her fault either, but it’s not right
It's very funny to me because in all the trans competing in sports threads, everyone was stating how simple it is. If you're born a woman, you can compete, if you're born a man and transition, you cannot. And I agree w/ that.Can someone define a woman for me? It seems to have changed these last 2 days
Can someone define a woman for me? It seems to have changed these last 2 days
It's very funny to me because in all the trans competing in sports threads, everyone was stating how simple it is. If you're born a woman, you can compete, if you're born a man and transition, you cannot. And I agree w/ that.
Now all the sudden being born a woman does not mean you can compete in women's sports apparently.
I think if she has indescended testicles that are producing testosterone like a males, it should still be a dqIt's very funny to me because in all the trans competing in sports threads, everyone was stating how simple it is. If you're born a woman, you can compete, if you're born a man and transition, you cannot. And I agree w/ that.
Now all the sudden being born a woman does not mean you can compete in women's sports apparently.
What makes you think she does? Did you read it somewhere? Has it been published that she has a certain condition because all I have seen is speculation?I think if she has indescended testicles that are producing testosterone like a males, it should still be a dq
She doesn’t exactly meet that standard, but she’s not a man either by definitionCan someone define a woman for me? It seems to have changed these last 2 days
Still at 0JK Rowling’s definition is pretty good. Based in biology and science. Unlike Liberals voodoo definitions.
It's all been speculation, for whatever reason he just REALLY wants her to have testicles.What makes you think she does? Did you read it somewhere? Has it been published that she has a certain condition because all I have seen is speculation?
Well, why don't you tell all your other asshat lib friends that they are asshats. LOL!Before some asshat asks where are the libs standing up to this. Here I am, saying it's not right to have a biological male competing with females.