ADVERTISEMENT

How's Keegan Doing?

Yep. That year:

Keegan:
7.2 PPG
0.5 APG
0.6 TOPG
0.83 AST/TO ratio
5.1 RPG

Connor:
3.3 PPG
3.6 APG
1.0 TOPG
3.6:1 AST/TO ratio
3.1 RPG

So Keegan, w/ 0.5 APG was worth about 8.2 PPG
Connor w/ 3.6 AGP was worth about 10.5 PPG

Keegan averaged 18 min/game; Connor 23 min/game

Pretty even, I'd say; and the extra assists and better AST/TO ratio, you'd probably start Connor over Keegan that year.

Keegan made a HUGE jump the following year.
Connor regressed that year; but bounced back to put up slightly better numbers the year after when Keegan entered the draft.

Keegan had much higher upside, but in his Freshman year, he most assuredly was neither a "star", nor a future NBA draft pick.

Yep. That year:

Keegan:
7.2 PPG
0.5 APG
0.6 TOPG
0.83 AST/TO ratio
5.1 RPG

Connor:
3.3 PPG
3.6 APG
1.0 TOPG
3.6:1 AST/TO ratio
3.1 RPG

So Keegan, w/ 0.5 APG was worth about 8.2 PPG
Connor w/ 3.6 AGP was worth about 10.5 PPG

Keegan averaged 18 min/game; Connor 23 min/game

Pretty even, I'd say; and the extra assists and better AST/TO ratio, you'd probably start Connor over Keegan that year.

Keegan made a HUGE jump the following year.
Connor regressed that year; but bounced back to put up slightly better numbers the year after when Keegan entered the draft.

Keegan had much higher upside, but in his Freshman year, he most assuredly was neither a "star", nor a future NBA draft pick.

I disagree. Keegan started popping up on mock drafts half way through his freshman year.
 
Oooh...."mock drafts"!!!!

He put up decent freshman numbers; he was not going to be an NBA draft pick with those numbers. He more than tripled his point output the next year.
This is where you are dead wrong. Keegan was projected as a mid to late first round pick before his sophomore season even began.
 
Last edited:
Sacramento (16-9) beats Washington (4-22), 143-131.

Keegan's Stats:

32 Minutes (of 48 possible)

4-7 (57%) from three
5-10 (50%) from 2 pt range
....................................
9-17 (53%) Overall Shooting

3-3 (100%) FTs

25 Points
5 Rebounds (1 Offensive)
4 Assists
1 Steal


0 Turnovers
4 Fouls
 
  • Love
Reactions: Hawksfor3
He shoulda probably played more as a freshman.
hqdefault.jpg
 
Yep. That year:

Keegan:
7.2 PPG
0.5 APG
0.6 TOPG
0.83 AST/TO ratio
5.1 RPG

Connor:
3.3 PPG
3.6 APG
1.0 TOPG
3.6:1 AST/TO ratio
3.1 RPG

So Keegan, w/ 0.5 APG was worth about 8.2 PPG
Connor w/ 3.6 AGP was worth about 10.5 PPG

Keegan averaged 18 min/game; Connor 23 min/game

Pretty even, I'd say; and the extra assists and better AST/TO ratio, you'd probably start Connor over Keegan that year.

Keegan made a HUGE jump the following year.
Connor regressed that year; but bounced back to put up slightly better numbers the year after when Keegan entered the draft.

Keegan had much higher upside, but in his Freshman year, he most assuredly was neither a "star", nor a future NBA draft pick.
You are an absolute dipshit in all aspects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuck C
This is where you are dead wrong. Keegan was projected as a mid to late first round pick before his sophomore season even began.
Nowhere near any consensus pick. He averaged similar points as a freshman as many other former Iowa guys who never made the NBA.

Where are Weiskamp and Garza playing now? What were their freshman numbers?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EvolutionDenier
Nowhere near any consensus pick. He averaged similar points as a freshman as many other former Iowa guys who never made the NBA.

Where are Weiskamp and Garza playing now? What were their freshman numbers?
Has nothing to do with freshman "numbers", but Keegan had a MUCH higher PER than either of those and was 3rd best on team as a freshman playing limited minutes. It was obvious to everyone that understands basketball that he was the most talented player on the team even then.
 
"I wonder what Keegan is thinking seeing his name projected in ESPN's NBA Draft Board - First Round! Would hate to lose him to the Draft but it would be a great selling point for Fran and the long-term success of the program."
From June 9, 2021.


From April 2021

There was some interest in spite of the stats.
 
Nowhere near any consensus pick. He averaged similar points as a freshman as many other former Iowa guys who never made the NBA.

Where are Weiskamp and Garza playing now? What were their freshman numbers?
There was a lot of First Round, and even mid-First Round buzz about him before or early in his sophomore year. It wasn't unanimous, but consensus doesn't require unanimity.







Nobody expected him to be a top 5 pick before the season though.
 
There was a lot of First Round, and even mid-First Round buzz about him before or early in his sophomore year. It wasn't unanimous, but consensus doesn't require unanimity.








Nobody expected him to be a top 5 pick before the season though.

"Is he poised to be a sophomore star?" looks like a question; not a guarantee.

There are TONS of examples of Iowa Freshman who did not develop much in their careers. And fizzled completely.
 
There was a lot of First Round, and even mid-First Round buzz about him before or early in his sophomore year. It wasn't unanimous, but consensus doesn't require unanimity.








Nobody expected him to be a top 5 pick before the season though.

"could be" a future pick.

Not "will be". Understand the difference?
 
Uh...those are the numbers we are referring to.
No. Those are the numbers you keep referring to, and as everyone keeps telling you, those numbers aren't what made him a first round prospect after his freshman year. Everyone expected Keegan's numbers to blow up in year 2 when Fran made him a starter and a focal part of the offense. He had already shown everyone what he was capable of if given the opportunity during his freshman year. If you want to argue that his performance in the first few months of his sophomore campaign made him a lottery pick, you'd have a great argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 504hawk
No. Those are the numbers you keep referring to, and as everyone keeps telling you, those numbers aren't what made him a first round prospect after his freshman year. Everyone expected Keegan's numbers to blow up in year 2 when Fran made him a starter
Everyone expected him to improve.

Not become an All Big Ten all star.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IIowaFarmBoy
Brown and Fox really pushed him during the off season. I really like Sabonis as the on court coach. he is constantly engaging Murray and its paying off.
It's really cool to watch the interactions between Keegan and Fox, Monk, Coach, and Sabonis during a game. It seems to be working. :) The summer work with Fox is really showing now.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT