Answer. The. Question.And you claim to be so smart.
Who has been “appointed” to an elective office?
Answer. The. Question.And you claim to be so smart.
Nice. Because he has different views than you, you want him to jump off a cliff? Maybe see a Dr. for your anger issues. That's psychotic behavior.Holy. Shit. Jump off a cliff.
Kamala and you know it. She didn't get one single registered voters vote to be the nominee, she was appointed the position by the Democrat elites.Answer. The. Question.
Who has been “appointed” to an elective office?
You're having a very bad thread (maybe you'll learn something from that but probably not), but "Presidential nominee of the Democratic party" is not an elective office.Kamala and you know it. She didn't get one single registered voters vote to be the nominee, she was appointed the position by the Democrat elites.
The nominee of a party is not an elected office, you moran. And until 1976, the party “elites” in BOTH PARTIES chose their nominees at the convention. Eugene McCarthy had more delegates than Hubert Humphrey in ‘68…who was the Democratic nominee?Kamala and you know it. She didn't get one single registered voters vote to be the nominee, she was appointed the position by the Democrat elites.
Been hearing that since 2016.Most Pubs I know wish Trump would just shut up then grow the hell up; the only reason they’re voting for him is because he’s the nominee and they feel the Democratic Party is despicable.
Twist it however you want. She was not elected by the registered Democrat voters. To get the nomination you have to have the most "registered party voters", well until this year, that changed didn't it. 0 votes is not the majority of votes. It's be inserted.You're having a very bad thread (maybe you'll learn something from that but probably not), but "Presidential nominee of the Democratic party" is not an elective office.
You're an unsupported assertions machine. And can't explain yourself when called out.
Always twisting the and distorting everything.The nominee of a party is not an elected office you moran. And until the mid-70’s/early 80’s, the party “elites” in BOTH PARTIES chose their nominees at the convention. Primaries were instructive and chose delegates but those delegates were a minority vote. They could be, and were, overruled by your “elites”. So you’ve stated - on the record - that the United States of America was, for most of its history, a communist country. And you wonder why people treat you like the idiot you are. Learn some history before you post again.
Lol, to get the nomination, you have to have the most DELEGATE votes. Biden released his pledged delegates to vote however they wanted. Who did they vote for, moran?Twist it however you want. She was not elected by the registered Democrat voters. To get the nomination you have to have the most "registered party voters", well until this year, that changed didn't it. 0 votes is not the majority of votes. It's be inserted.
Ok…what did I post that’s inaccurate? Be specific and cite your source.Always twisting the and distorting everything.
She didn’t need to be. The DNC and RNC are businesses. They appoint whoever will bring the desired results.Twist it however you want. She was not elected by the registered Democrat voters. To get the nomination you have to have the most "registered party voters", well until this year, that changed didn't it. 0 votes is not the majority of votes. It's be inserted.
What is so hard to understand about this. What you just said is exactly why a lot of people will vote trump instead of democrat. The people don't want the elites deciding everything. This is why people support Trump getting rid of the deep state. This is why people have a problem with Obama, Clinton, Pelosi unilaterally deciding who the candidate is. But don't claim to be the party who saves democracy when you want things decided by the elite in your party instead of fair elections by the people.The nominee of a party is not an elected office, you moran. And until 1976, the party “elites” in BOTH PARTIES chose their nominees at the convention. Eugene McCarthy had more delegates than Hubert Humphrey in ‘68…who was the Democratic nominee?
Primaries were instructive and chose delegates but those delegates were a minority vote. They could be, and were, overruled by your “elites”. So you’ve stated - on the record - that the United States of America was, for most of its history, a communist country. And you wonder why people treat you like the idiot you are. Learn some history before you post again.
It is as if you completely ignore that Trump isn't running on anything and has no policies. He's just against stuff and for scaring people. I shake my head when I read shit like this. The lack of self-awareness on the right is stark. That's why your party is in a statistical tie against a candidate who's been running for a month. This shouldn't even be close.I agree with what you said, what is your opinion about how this will play out? I believe she has agreed to a debate, are they just going to have her memorize canned answers for the whole debate? This may turn out to be atrocious because she is not smooth enough to pull off canned answers.
The media have provided significant cover for Kamala for the lack of interviews, policy, and they have been compliant with the marketing blitz. Will they go along with this all the way up to the election? I think even compliant media will have questions at some point.
I love it when the MAGA idiot brigade tries to engage you in a battle of wits. 😂Lol, to get the nomination, you have to have the most DELEGATE votes. Biden released his pledged delegates to vote however they wanted. Who did they vote for, moran?
Ok…what did I post that’s inaccurate? Be specific and cite your source.
In the modern era, the delegates in most if not all of the primaries are pledged to vote for the candidate who won their state. If a candidate gets a majority of all convention delegates pledged to them, the nomination is theirs. That can’t be overturned before or at the convention unless those pledged delegates are released to vote for whoever. That’s what Biden did.She didn’t need to be. The DNC and RNC are businesses. They appoint whoever will bring the desired results.
If you think Harris is a Marxist you're a moron. I am so sick of the right not having a clue what Marxism is. FFS it's not shit you don't agree with.I’m GOP. I despise Trump. But Harris is awful too. A Marxist.
I think Trump squeaks in.
Please explain what Marxism is and why kamala doesn't fit the bill. What would you describe her as if not Marxist.If you think Harris is a Marxist you're a moron. I am so sick of the right not having a clue what Marxism is. FFS it's not shit you don't agree with.
WTAF are you blathering on about? The “elites”ceded their stranglehold over the nominating process in 1976 in BOTH PARTIES. The delegates chosen in the primaries are pledged to their candidates and those pledged delegates have majority rule at both conventions. If a candidate comes to the convention with a majority of primary-won pledged delegates, the nomination is theirs. Period. End’Ostory.What is so hard to understand about this. What you just said is exactly why a lot of people will vote trump instead of democrat. The people don't want the elites deciding everything. This is why people support Trump getting rid of the deep state. This is why people have a problem with Obama, Clinton, Pelosi unilaterally deciding who the candidate is. But don't claim to be the party who saves democracy when you want things decided by the elite in your party instead of fair elections by the people.
You’re the one who made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.Please explain what Marxism is and why kamala doesn't fit the bill. What would you describe her as if not Marxist.
@Hawk_82 take note.WTAF are you blathering on about? The “elites”ceded their stranglehold over the nominating process in 1976 in BOTH PARTIES. The delegates chosen in the primaries are pledged to their candidates and those pledged delegates have majority rule at both conventions. If a candidate comes to the convention with a majority of primary-won pledged delegates, the nomination is theirs. Period. End’Ostory.
If there is no candidate who has that majority, one of two things happens. They either horse-trade before the first ballot so one candidate has the votes or nobody takes the first ballot and it goes to a second ballot. I can’t swear to it but I think on that round, the delegates are free to choose whoever they wish so coalitions get built.
Your idea that Obama or Clinton or anyone else decides who is chosen is absolute, idiotic, horseshit.
You’re already on the post so the keeping the trash away from the post ship has already sailed.I’m being optimistic coming off the DNC. I would like to hear from Republicans, but the ones on here just spam trash, so I don’t really care.
I would really like to hear from Republicans or Centrists, on what they think about the election.
If the usual trash could stay out of the thread, that would be great, but I’m not expecting it.
This is the guy who - not kidding - claimed to be a moderate earlier in the thread.You’re the one who made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.
She’s a Marxist.You’re the one who made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.
I am a moderate who has voted for both sides. although at the current time I am probably as anti democrat as anyone on this board.
I listened to some of the speeches at the DNC. I was not impressed. I think dems know that the real democrat message will not win the election for them. They are pro war, pro trans, pro racial division, pro climate change agenda, pro price controls, pro government control, pro censorship, pro dei, etc. This message is not one that will win over the majority of the country. So instead they are trying to create more hatred toward trump while just presenting Kamala as a positive image.
I despise the fact that the whole democratic agenda is based on lies and deception. Dems tried to hide Biden's age and mental decline until it was proven beyond any shadow of belief. They have now implemented a new candidate late in the process without any input from the people, they are keeping her from interviews. They are not forthcoming with what her policies are. They It all just seems like a big lie and it makes me not trust them.
They denied her being appointed as the 'border czar' despite it being published that way for a long time. She said the economy is great under Biden and even came out with Kamalonics but then comes out saying that inflation is really hurting people. Democrats think they can just straight up lie to people and the stupid people will just believe whatever they say.
You seem kinda bitter and spiteful for someone who’s spent 3 1/2 years under Joe ‘The Healer’ Biden.Crawl back under your “both sides” rock.
Republicans tried to hang Pence and they call Harris the most unpopular VP in history. You just can't make this shit up.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Donald trump has put together the greatest unity party possibly in our nation's history. The endorsement from kennedy today is the most powerful in modern history. An assassination attempt could not stop what is coming. Kamala Harris stands for nothing. She's the least popular VP in recorded us history and her one assignment as the border czar resulted in 12 million illegal aliens. Vote accordingly.
He doesn’t give detailed policy details. He talks about crowd size, riffs of injecting bleach, talks about golfing, praising Putin, talks about how he’s the best, etc. Those who were in his cabinet have said he stayed in his room watching Fox News and didn’t read intel and briefings. Dude was worried about headlines vs doing his job.Are you really going to pretend Trump hasn’t been anywhere and everywhere since 2015? This asshole would talk to a light pole if the camera was on and people would watch. He’s put plenty of his brain on film for mass consumption, probably more than anyone in history, for better or worse.
Nope. Anyone who can look at those two parties and discern no difference between them has a shoe-size IQ. The sooner you crawl back under your respective rocks, the sooner the Republican Party can return to being the party I voted for in ‘92.You seem kinda bitter and spiteful for someone who’s spent 3 1/2 years under Joe ‘The Healer’ Biden.
Maybe you misspoke?
You’ve NEVER been able to explain what this means when you attach it to a Democrat. You don’t know what it means, like another poster said. It’s a scare word that you just got duped into using.She’s a Marxist.
She has no policies that would be considered Marxist. Not one!!! That's about the most definitive answer you can get. It took no time at all.Please explain what Marxism is and why kamala doesn't fit the bill. What would you describe her as if not Marxist.
I went ahead and answered it for him since it was easy.You’re the one who made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.
That border bill was a joke, still allowing too many migrants in b4 it would kick in. Essentially, it was a way to process even more migrants into this country more quickly. That’s not what the American public wants. There needs to be some level of legal migration to this country (like the level during the Trump administration). At that time they also had the “remain in Mexico” policy that Biden got rid of on day one of his administration.The GOP has no standing to even comment on the border. They sank a bipartisan border deal to benefit their orange-tinted dictator.
Only an idiot would believe that what’s wrong in Central America can be fixed in three years. From the link I shared with you, more of the Vice-President’s remarks:
“But let me be clear, people who've been working on this for decades will tell you, it will not be obvious overnight. The work we are going to have to do will require a commitment that is continuous, that we institutionalize with our partners and that's the work that I'm prepared to do, which is to begin that process of meaningful work knowing that we are going to have to have a long-term strategy and it will take some time to see the benefits of that work. But it will be worth it.”
That’s how a president speaks.
No policies???? He wants to get even more out of the American energy sector; close the border and deport those that came to the U.S. illegally; impose tariffs on other countries (if necessary) to level the playing field in trade; decrease gov’t regulations; strengthen the military; get rid of any DEI gov’t hiring practices; and stop writing blank checks to other countries to defend themselves. Just because you may not agree with his policies, doesn’t mean he doesn’t have any.It is as if you completely ignore that Trump isn't running on anything and has no policies. He's just against stuff and for scaring people. I shake my head when I read shit like this. The lack of self-awareness on the right is stark. That's why your party is in a statistical tie against a candidate who's been running for a month. This shouldn't even be close.
He got barely over 50% in the ‘24 Iowa caucus where app 16% of republicans even bothered to show up. The only Trump ‘cult’ exists in your mind.Been hearing that since 2016.
Somehow Trump keeps winning the Republican nomination.
Odd.
I’m on board with a lot of your points, but I can’t agree with that one. I see Trump nuts all the time.The only Trump ‘cult’ exists in your mind.
So Biden bypassed the legislative process and I know you hate that, put those restrictions into effect anyway, and border crossings have dropped. Interesting.That border bill was a joke, still allowing too many migrants in b4 it would kick in. Essentially, it was a way to process even more migrants into this country more quickly. That’s not what the American public wants. There needs to be some level of legal migration to this country (like the level during the Trump administration). At that time they also had the “remain in Mexico” policy that Biden got rid of on day one of his administration.
For the hundredth time, PLEASE GOOGLE indictments and arrests by presidential administration, and then come back and explain how that research backs up what you just said. It’s NOT EVEN CLOSE. It’s almost 100 to 0.
Where you propose removing another 5 trillion dollars from the economy in new taxes and you propose taxing unrealized gains, when you want to limit even more of the American energy industry and you are trying to force people to buy and drive electric vehicles they don’t want, you are a Marxist.You’ve NEVER been able to explain what this means when you attach it to a Democrat. You don’t know what it means, like another poster said. It’s a scare word that you just got duped into using.
You don’t want one of Elons cars???Where you propose removing another 5 trillion dollars from the economy in new taxes and you propose taxing unrealized gains, when you want to limit even more of the American energy industry and you are trying to force people to buy and drive electric vehicles they don’t want, you are a Marxist.
Good luck with that. They're even flooding non political threads now.If the usual trash could stay out of the thread, that would be great, but I’m not expecting it.