Do you think the receivers are the strength of this offense? I don't think the receivers are any better this year than they were when CJ was here.
To answer your question, no, I don't think Stanley is better than CJ. IMO, Stanley is putting up better numbers than CJ because he's being put in better position to succeed because we are throwing to our TEs more, more passes in the middle of the field, and more intermediate/long passing attempts. With that said, Stanley has still played pretty well for a true sophomore.
As somebody posted earlier, pound it in.Hockenson has sure been a bright spot this season.
Especially when they don't drop the ball...Hitting guys in stride makes a huge difference.
Ha. Where you at on the over throws and throw behinds? Makes 1 throw and you start chirpingSuck it haters.
There is no doubt receivers are better because Kittle/Vandy were hurt most of last year. Easley, ISM, Hockensen, and improved Fant.
Agree that without stout guys at DT Iowa tends to get gashed. I still expect to see 2004 and 2009 type DLs again. Last year Iowa was decent at #15, we need a Jaleel type and Lattimore will get there next year but who else.We used to have playmakers on DL that would make a play at some point in the series and get a punt. less defensive line talent and offense are better getting the ball out. I don't think we'll see Iowa defense like 2004 or 2009 again.
ISU leads by a TD. Clearly that means we will beat Ohio St.
Helps not going into the wind!
What about 2015? I think Tevaun Smith would be the best receiver on this team.
Ha. Where you at on the over throws and throw behinds? Makes 1 throw and you start chirping
Nixon.Agree that without stout guys at DT Iowa tends to get gashed. I still expect to see 2004 and 2009 type DLs again. Last year Iowa was decent at #15, we need a Jaleel type and Lattimore will get there next year but who else.
Has anyone ever seen someone play middle LB and QB in the same game in college football before?