Is the world over-populated?
- Thread starter BrianNole09
- Start date
Dems are somewhat more evolved, on average. They may not be willing to take the necessary action but at least they aren't running on doing the opposite of what needs doing. Eliminating the stupidest voices might make sensible action possible. No point in killing lots of innocent people when there are so many guilty ones we could start with.Or Democrats....or both. I don't identify with either, so that should make for a much quieter place, if not more peaceful as well.
One can only imagine........
So we could also use the contrasting example of people who have too much water.... New Orleans....
The "save the planet" stuff is done for selfish reasons
the planet will be fine. When it grows tired of humans, it will wipe us out and Mother Earth will continue on its merry way.
I have read that the biggest factor is a huge reduction in infant mortality.
We have a choice: to intelligently restrain our own rate of reproduction, or to be "free" to breed with abandon. We have religions and political parties which make it hard to make the sensible choice.
By failing to plan intelligently, we let "nature's market" decide. The market's tools - which you listed - are not very gentle. And, so far, have not done a very effective job of solving the problem.
One of my best friends has had 7 children! He's a college professor, too! Whenever we get into a discussion about the kids, he will go with "But, I can definitely provide for them." To which I say: "It's not about you providing for them. It's out-of-balance replacement value. Your 7 could have 7 more each. So you and your wife, in one generation, have possibly become 50!" Needless to say, to remain friends, we don't talk about that topic very much.
Doesn't really help the problem at hand though which is what the op is asking.
Absolutely. Building an entire city below sea level on one of the biggest rivers in the world is a recipe for disaster.
Oh I agree...which is why I'd start with people who argue about politics.
...................................................You don't argue about politics, do you WWJD?
If I had to characterize what my role would be within the political spectrum, it would be:
Of course not. I just tell them what Jesus would do. That isn't arguing. That's the word of God.
Similar threads
