Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFCBought?
Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFCBought?
She’s what all politicians should strive to be.
Her more than most.Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFC
You can’t see the forest through the trees.Sinema like politicians are the reason why the country is in the shitter. Too many of our Representatives only care about the people/corporations/super pacs who write the big checks.
I pretty much agree with this. There are a select few exceptions.Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFC
I actually don’t care that Sinema bucks the party. I just think she craves attention. She’s the Democrat version of Tulsi Gabbard.Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFC
Yeah, pretty much you are the one driving that narrative just so you can go all TJ.You guys truly are entertaining to watch. Four years ago you were ecstatic that she beat McSally to flip a Senate seat in a traditionally red state. Now in 2022, even before today's announcement, you've branded her a 'loser', a 'phony', and a 'sellout'.
This woman has voted in line with the rest of her party 93.1% of the time - more than Bernie Sanders (91.4%). More than either one of the senators from Nevada (Rosen and Cortez Masto are both 91.5%). More than Jon Tester of Montana (89.8%).
You guys demand absolute, unwavering fealty to the party and anything less gets you the Nicky Santoro treatment.
I can agree with this as well.I actually don’t care that Sinema bucks the party. I just think she craves attention. She’s the Democrat version of Tulsi Gabbard.
You can’t see the forest through the trees.
They are all bought, but at least she doesn’t vote lockstep with her party. If she sees a problem, like the “Inflation reduction act” before it was reworked, she’ll say something.You're singing the praises of Sinema while also complaining that all of our politicians are bought. That's the definition of irony.
I’ll ask you the same question: Who do you look to as a better politician?I actually don’t care that Sinema bucks the party. I just think she craves attention. She’s the Democrat version of Tulsi Gabbard.
I think I just said her voting history doesn’t bother me.I’ll ask you the same question: Who do you look to as a better politician?
Yep, it was mostly procedural as some didn't want the increase attached to COVID relief package. But the curtsy stunt didn't win her any friends.Seven other Democrats also voted no on that amendment, including both senators from Delaware and both senators from New Hampshire.
Also, you gotta admit that cheerleader skirt is kinda sexy.
She came in an ultra progressive and now she's voting down minimum wage increases. That's not independence. That's subservience.Not lockstep with her party. They’re all bought. JFC
LOL. She has been a complete prima donna, holding up and outright crashing key components of the Democratic party agenda. There might be more corrupt grifting corporate Democrats in the Senate, but Sinema appears to take pleasure in making a spectacle of herself in opposing broadly supported Democratic policy priorities (see the thumbs down on the minimum wage increase as one obvious example),You guys truly are entertaining to watch. Four years ago you were ecstatic that she beat McSally to flip a Senate seat in a traditionally red state. Now in 2022, even before today's announcement, you've branded her a 'loser', a 'phony', and a 'sellout'.
This woman has voted in line with the rest of her party 93.1% of the time - more than Bernie Sanders (91.4%). More than either one of the senators from Nevada (Rosen and Cortez Masto are both 91.5%). More than Jon Tester of Montana (89.8%).
You guys demand absolute, unwavering fealty to the party and anything less gets you the Nicky Santoro treatment.
Prescription drugs is one obvious example. And along with Manchin, she strung Build Back Better along for forever with ongoing and ever changing demands. Again, Sinema appears to take pleasure in throwing a wrench into the gears of Democratic party policy priorities.You stated that she has held up major Democratic legislative priorities and I simply asked for some examples. I'm not sure why you consider that an unreasonable request.
Stop simplifying her positionsShe came in an ultra progressive and now she's voting down minimum wage increases. That's not independence. That's subservience.
So me holding her to account for her actual votes isn't fair?Stop simplifying her positions
No, the bill wasn’t just about minimum wageSo me holding her to account for her actual votes isn't fair?
You guys truly are entertaining to watch. Four years ago you were ecstatic that she beat McSally to flip a Senate seat in a traditionally red state. Now in 2022, even before today's announcement, you've branded her a 'loser', a 'phony', and a 'sellout'.
This woman has voted in line with the rest of her party 93.1% of the time - more than Bernie Sanders (91.4%). More than either one of the senators from Nevada (Rosen and Cortez Masto are both 91.5%). More than Jon Tester of Montana (89.8%).
You guys demand absolute, unwavering fealty to the party and anything less gets you the Nicky Santoro treatment.
If the D’s want to lose the seat to a Republican they will…split the D leaning voters between Sinema and the D candidate? Beyond stupid.Ds will absolutely run against her. She has near zero support in the party anymore.
Yep, she run as an independent in the general like Trump will. And the Republican will win the seat.If the D’s want to lose the seat to a Republican they will…split the D leaning voters between Sinema and the D candidate? Beyond stupid.
That’s why she registered independent….to keep from getting primary’d.Yep, she run as an independent in the general like Trump will. And the Republican will win the seat.
Very smart on her part.That’s why she registered independent….to keep from getting primary’d.
He won’t get it. The republican will.Says she doesn’t fit with either party, but still wants her committee assignments so I guess that means caucusing with the Democrats.
The real reason: she knows Ruben Gallego is coming for her seat in ‘24.
Kyrsten Sinema Says She Will Leave the Democratic Party
The Arizona senator is registering as an independent, noting that she “never fit perfectly in either national party.”www.nytimes.com
They'll see if they can keep her off the ballot.Ds will absolutely run against her. She has near zero support in the party anymore.
She’s become the devil to you guys. I will vote for her over the Dem and Republican candidates. Unless, you leave $1,000,000 in unmarked bills near the old oak tree of my choosing.They'll see if they can keep her off the ballot.
How difficult is it to get on the ballot as an indie in AZ?
Sinema has plenty of time.
She should work out a sponsorship deal with Cinnabon.
Why? Why will you vote for her?She’s become the devil to you guys. I will vote for her over the Dem and Republican candidates. Unless, you leave $1,000,000 in unmarked bills near the old oak tree of my choosing.
Seriously. Get a life you unwavering haters.
Yep, going to the highest bidder is not a winning hand in the long run. This will come back to bite her in the arse.I think I just said her voting history doesn’t bother me.
In terms of seriousness, there are countless others who do their work quietly without seeking the spotlight like she does. And negotiate in good faith and don’t play hide the ball on their negotiating positions. Those are the ones I prefer.
Say hello to the next republican senator in Arizona, whoever that will be.Yep, going to the highest bidder is not a winning hand in the long run. This will come back to bite her in the arse.
She's not the devil. She's just an attention seeking sellout.She’s become the devil to you guys. I will vote for her over the Dem and Republican candidates. Unless, you leave $1,000,000 in unmarked bills near the old oak tree of my choosing.
Seriously. Get a life you unwavering haters.
And didn’t vote for that bloated legislation you thought would save the country.She's not the devil. She's just an attention seeking sellout.
How so, shes underwater with dems,cons and independents. Not a good look.Very smart on her part.
Says she doesn’t fit with either party, but still wants her committee assignments so I guess that means caucusing with the Democrats.
The real reason: she knows Ruben Gallego is coming for her seat in ‘24.
Kyrsten Sinema Says She Will Leave the Democratic Party
The Arizona senator is registering as an independent, noting that she “never fit perfectly in either national party.”www.nytimes.com