ADVERTISEMENT

Miller-Meeks joins Trump lawsuit against Register, Iowa pollster

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,413
62,520
113
Deplorable!:

U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks and a former state senator joined President Donald Trump's lawsuit against pollster Ann Selzer, the Des Moines Register and the newspaper's parent company, Gannett.
The suit alleges Selzer, her company, The Register and Gannett committed consumer fraud by publishing a poll three days before the Nov. 5 general election that showed Vice President Kamala Harris leading Trump by three percentage points in the Republican-led state. Trump ultimately won Iowa by more than 13 percentage points.




That Iowa Poll also reported Iowans in the 1st and 3rd Districts preferred a Democrat over a Republican to represent them in Congress. The poll did not include candidate names. In Miller-Meeks' race in southeast Iowa, 53% of surveyed likely voters said they preferred a Democrat and 37% said they preferred a Republican.

People are also reading…​



Miller-Meeks ended up winning the race after a recount by two tenths of a percentage point, fewer than 800 votes of about 427,000 cast.

The suit alleges polling in Miller-Meeks' race in the 1st District was, likewise, not a "miss," but "intentional wrongdoing" and "manufactured for the purpose of skewing election results in favor of Democrats," violating the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act, which prohibits deceptive advertising.
Miller-Meeks alleges that the poll "substantially contribute(d) to forcing Representative Miller-Meeks into an electoral struggle."

"Representative Miller-Meeks never should have been subjected to a recount — and a costly recount at that — and would not have been if not for the combined impact of the Harris Poll and the Congressional Poll on her race," the suit states.


The suit alleges that the Trump campaign and other Republicans "were forced to divert campaign and financial resources to Iowa" because of the poll.
"Proud to join President Donald J. Trump in a lawsuit against DM Register Pollster Ann Selzer and media enablers for manipulative, dishonest and fake election polls," Miller-Meeks said in an emailed statement.

Former state Sen. Brad Zaun, a Republican from Urbandale who lost reelection to the senate, has also joined the lawsuit. The Iowa Poll did not survey for statehouse or state senate races.
The suit also argues the suit should move back to state district court. The suit was initially filed in Polk County District Court, but at the request of Gannett was kicked to federal court.

“On Jan. 20, 2025, President Trump proclaimed from the Oval Office his administration’s commitment to protecting the free speech rights of the American people," Nick Klinefeldt, Des Moines Register counsel, said in an emailed statement. "This lawsuit, which seeks to suppress political speech protected at the core of the First Amendment, flies in the face of the President’s promise. The amended complaint filed only exposes this hypocrisy and reinforces that this case has no merit."

The Register and Gannett plan to continue defending themselves against the suit, Klinefeldt said. Selzer is being represented by free speech advocacy organization The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

"Mr. Trump's lawsuit, now joined by two others, does not change the core truth that the First Amendment protects speech about elections. We look forward to vindicating the First Amendment, and Ms. Selzer's rights, in court," FIRE said in an emailed statement.

 
On December 13, 2024, the Cedar Rapids Gazette published an article (linked below). The article headline indicated "Ann Selzer still searching for answers after final Iowa Poll badly missed its mark".

It's nearing two months now. I'd be curious how her search for answers is coming along. It would be nice if the media did a follow up.

 
Fred Savage No GIF by The Grinder
 
You think she was non-biased, lol?
Dumb-asses like you are what is wrong with the country. You have this perception of persecution if the result isn't what you like. Was she so biased when she predicted Trump in 16 and 21? I'll hang up and wait.

“My philosophy in public opinion research is to take my best shot at revealing the truth of a future event, in this case Election Day,” she wrote. “Without fear or favor, we used the same method as the final poll this year to show a healthy Trump lead in both 2020 and 2016. Those turned out to capture the mood of the electorate reasonably well, though both took fire from Iowans who doubted the findings could be true.”
 
She just won 3 months ago, so I wouldn't be so sure.
The supreme irony of her asinine decision is there was a recount THE FIRST time she ran, and I believe the vote total was even closer.

Now she's saying the reason for the recount in the SECOND election is because of a poll.

It's stupid on its face. So in other words, BAU for the Marionette.

Gretel-wood-marionette-ru033.jpg
 
The supreme irony of her asinine decision is there was a recount THE FIRST time she ran, and I believe the vote total was even closer.

Now she's saying the reason for the recount in the SECOND election is because of a poll.

It's stupid on its face. So in other words, BAU for the Marionette.

Gretel-wood-marionette-ru033.jpg
She won her first term by 6 votes.
 
Dumb-asses like you are what is wrong with the country. You have this perception of persecution if the result isn't what you like. Was she so biased when she predicted Trump in 16 and 21? I'll hang up and wait.

“My philosophy in public opinion research is to take my best shot at revealing the truth of a future event, in this case Election Day,” she wrote. “Without fear or favor, we used the same method as the final poll this year to show a healthy Trump lead in both 2020 and 2016. Those turned out to capture the mood of the electorate reasonably well, though both took fire from Iowans who doubted the findings could be true.”
The question still stands…was her poll non-biased?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: McLovin32
It’s a cult. MMM had to join because if she didn’t the leader would not be infallible. Selzer got quite a few races right in favor of Republicans. Why aren’t any of them suing Selzer? Why isn’t Christina Bohannon suing Selzer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
It isn’t just Trump’s vanity why this is going on. He got ABC to bend the knee. He’s suing CBS, too. This is about intimidation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gohawks50
Just another cuntsligliari for the Dim Kim regime. Put her on the heap with Chris Counoyer, Lt. Cuntsigliari.
So torbee, tell me how you really feel?

You know it’s possible that Selzer was “gotcha’d” by a few respondents and she has no control over the answers she receives.
I know that to answer tge OP question, Selzer was waiting for the “official” numbers to be released by the Sec of State so she could compare her date. I don’t believe those numbers were released until late December or early January.
Selzer has appeared on IPBN post election and had no real explanation until she could analyze those “official” numbers. She suspects that many of her respondents who indicated they were going to vote in November may have in fact not voted and those numbers would definitely affect her projected results.
Selzer certainly been “gold” in projecting the past several Iowans election results. Abd, as Hayden Fry would tell folks after a bad game, “the sun don’t shine on the same dog’s rump everyday.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT