Did they raid the apartment where he was living first? If not, that doesn't make sense.
Not sure. I thought they raided all 3 apartments at the same time to not only gather evidence but to hopefully arrest the suspect.
Did they raid the apartment where he was living first? If not, that doesn't make sense.
Did you read that they raided all the apartments at the same time or is that just an assumption? If so that would be a lot of officers in one apartment complex. There seemed to be about 5 involved in the raid that killed Amir. So you are saying there were about 15 officers conducting 3 no knock raids at the same time in 1 apartment complex?Not sure. I thought they raided all 3 apartments at the same time to not only gather evidence but to hopefully arrest the suspect.
it's clear who is having a hissy fit and falsely accusing @Hawkman98 and me of lying.
But it is entertaining seeing you look so incredibly stupid.
Did you read that they raided all the apartments at the same time or is that just an assumption? If so that would be a lot of officers in one apartment complex. There seemed to be about 5 involved in the raid that killed Amir. So you are saying there were about 15 officers conducting 3 no knock raids at the same time in 1 apartment complex?
How does that show the raids were executed at the same time?there's been so much TV and print/online coverage I forget where i heard/read it but I am pretty sure they did the raids at the same time. The complex is large and I am not sure how they could do one raid at a time based on the following:
7th floor Unit: Amir, the murder suspects' brother & girlfriend were here. Police seized a jacket that they believe the murder suspect was wearing on the night of the murder
14th floor Unit: the murder suspect & his mom lived here. Officers seized a hat that police believe the suspect was wearing when he committed the murder and other items associated with two people believed to be with the murder suspect soon after the Jan. 10 murder.
14th floor unit: A friend of the murder suspect lived here. "A large amount of marijuana" was seized.
He's just talking out of his ass. At least he isn't tagging his daddy anymore.How does that show the raids were executed at the same time?
How does that show the raids were executed at the same time?
Yes, I don't understand why you are so sure they were simultaneous.well, one of the 3 raids got delayed because Amir got shot, which is one clue
and there were too many people involved in the 3 units who all knew each other; and, as you can see, there was evidence gathered from each unit. Do you really think the raids would have occurred one unit at a time?
You are mistaken.I really don't care what you think. The video is pretty clear, the cops did not give Locke a chance to comply and shot him. Keep defending poorly trained police officers.
I don’t think Fran is actually a cop. But, he is some kind of weird cop groupie/fan boy it seems.
Which is really odd. Haven’t really seen that kind of thing at this level before.
I don’t think there is anything he wouldn’t defend police for.
He likes validation. God bless cops, but Hawkman let himself become a vehicle for one of Frans agenda threads.Fran is one weird poster. The repeated tagging of hawkman98 is really weird.
At this point, nothing any of us can do but wait and see what happens next. I imagine the police will try to just say ‘oops’ and move on. But, I hope the incident gets a full, thorough, transparent investigation and changes are made to the no knock warrant policy, and the people responsible for the death of this man, pay for the life they took.
I don’t think Fran is actually a cop. But, he is some kind of weird cop groupie/fan boy it seems.
Which is really odd. Haven’t really seen that kind of thing at this level before.
I don’t think there is anything he wouldn’t defend police for.
Definitely a strange guy. It seems like everytime there is a high profile incident were a cop kills someone he rushes over here to white knight for the police department and try to smear the victim.
He likes validation. God bless cops, but Hawkman let himself become a vehicle for one of Frans agenda threads.
To think I actually defended this guy against ridicule for his bizzare reasoning at one time.
Listen condescending *******, ..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,comma,,,,comma,,, comma, the word editor prompts me. For sure, for sure. So **** off with grammar policing. My keyboard is flaky, and I can never get through a post w/o having to retype. So, again you can **** off, and still I am explaining this to you.
You can't seem to get it through your think skull the post that when I make my initial point of police over was not related to this case. It was a general comment. You came back with the insistence it should relate to this case.
If there was relevance to this situation it was that multiple errors were made. It appears to have been a crime scene gone wrong. THEY KILLED THE WRONG PERSON. Guns pointed? You have come to your conclusion but analyses of videos confirmed this?
And Fran, sanctimonious was refering to your response to my "..and it the guy would have been white" quote.
It had nothing to do with others on a moral high horse,..or whatever you were driving at.
You are sounding pretty flakey here. Like a wing nut.
Has anyone noticed Fran committing a serious board rules violation by posting entire articles? That used to get him riled up.
Also, Ts and Ps to hawkman's notifications after getting tagged probably a dozen times by that lunatic.
@Hawkman98 actually brings common sense & good discussion to topics like this. Clowns like you? Not so much.
And I can see that his knowledge drives some of you nut jobs even more nuts. It's pretty funny to watch your ignorance on display.
In this case the police don't need defending, an accident took place seems pretty cut and dried to me.I don’t think Fran is actually a cop. But, he is some kind of weird cop groupie/fan boy it seems.
Which is really odd. Haven’t really seen that kind of thing at this level before.
I don’t think there is anything he wouldn’t defend police for.
Yes, I don't understand why you are so sure they were simultaneous.
Damn I step away to eat and Fran continues his meltdown by attacking every poster that dared to disagree with him. The guy loves living in his bubble and can't handle any challenges to his views.
Your hypocritical meltdown continues.
You are the poster, after all, who called me and @Hawkman98 liars because you could not handle us challenging your incorrect viewpoint on this particular case.
This ridiculous post of yours that follows, where you went bass ass crazy, deserves to be in a Hall of Shame. And it is funny how you bring up "bizzare reasoning." People can read what follows and know how bizzare you are. And it's clearly not just your keyboard that is "flaky."
Do you have a link? I assume 701 was 7 floors lower so it could have easily been the first apartment they raided. If they happened simultaneously this should be stated as fact by authorities not just conjecture on your part.KARE 11 (NBC affiliate) just live reported that the apartments subject to the warrants were #1402, #1403 (next door), and #701 (where Amir was).
Can you now see why they would be simultaneous?
Assuming they were simultaneous, this was dumb as shit. If the cops are that unclear as to the location of their target the whole thing should have been a no-go. Putting that many officers and civilians at risk is the hallmark of bad police intel and piss-poor decision-making.KARE 11 (NBC affiliate) just live reported that the apartments subject to the warrants were #1402, #1403 (next door), and #701 (where Amir was).
Can you now see why they would be simultaneous?
Assuming they were simultaneous, this was dumb as shit. If the cops are that unclear as to the location of their target the whole thing should have been a no-go. Putting that many officers and civilians at risk is the hallmark of bad police intel and piss-poor decision-making.
But they found a jacket, a hat, and some marijuana so it was all worth it!Assuming they were simultaneous, this was dumb as shit. If the cops are that unclear as to the location of their target the whole thing should have been a no-go. Putting that many officers and civilians at risk is the hallmark of bad police intel and piss-poor decision-making.
Well see I don't read enough of these to realize if that's his MO. However, I do know he usually tags me when he has questions, so he can have someone that actually knows the answers give their thoughts and opinions. I have disagreed with Fran before, but he has always been very receptive and respectful. Pine is just a cop hater regardless of the situation.To be fair @Franisdaman never really has an honest conversation in these types of threads and certainly doesn't have any "training". He always takes a pro LE side. Which is why you probably side with him and call out @Pinehawk
I say we or our because I'm talking about my profession. How am I suppose to write it when I'm part of the LE community. Would using they be better for you? You're reading way too much into what I'm trying to explain. I'm just trying to explain some of the issues LE experience that maybe the non LE don't think about. See I didn't use I or we just for you.You speak for law enforcement as if you're the spokesman (we, our). You feel your mistakes get picked apart. You're at risk of being sued civilly, losing your job, being in the media and possibly going to prison. You're a victim of media talking points and the uneducated. You expect to be recorded and be analyzed second by second.
It doesn't seem like a healthy dynamic, hopefully that's just messageboard talk and not part of the culture of your workplace, although it would help explain some things.
It was a justified shooting. Case law backs up the shooting. I did say that doesn't mean the officer who shot won't be charged or sued civilly. Grand jury will be very careful not to have a replay of the Floyd situation. Btw, I said the Floyd killing some of the officer's were wrong. And I have no problem calling other LE out if they screwed up. You won't find too many more honest of cop as me. I arrested my co worker when I was in his wedding the next month, arrested another co worker that led to his firing and wrote plenty of cops tickets. I also arrested a fireman for OWI out of a fire truck. I try to be as fair and honest as I possibly can.@Hawkman98, Take a look at this. He continues to say that you, the Police Chief and I are lying about Amir lifting and pointing a loaded gun; he continues to state that the video disputes the story that the Minneapolis Police Chief has put out and thinks we are both parroting what the police chief says.
And it's ironic that this biased poster thinks it is we who are intellectually incapable of having a civilized discussion!
I agree with this statement. This occasion isn't one of those times when speaking on the shooting.I like police. I just want the poorly trained officers held accountable, especially when their mistakes end up with innocent people being killed.
But continue having your hissy fit in this thread, it's very entertaining to watch you throw around insults and then try to take the high ground.
Calling it a "justified shooting" dismisses all the stupid decisions that put everyone in the position that caused it. Is the officer at fault? No. But the leadership that insisted on no-knock middle of the night raids on three different homes looking for one person must be held accountable. They are not "justified".It was a justified shooting. Case law backs up the shooting. I did say that doesn't mean the officer who shot won't be charged or sued civilly. Grand jury will be very careful not to have a replay of the Floyd situation. Btw, I said the Floyd killing some of the officer's were wrong. And I have no problem calling other LE out if they screwed up. You won't find too many more honest of cop as me. I arrested my co worker when I was in his wedding the next month, arrested another co worker that led to his firing and wrote plenty of cops tickets. I also arrested a fireman for OWI out of a fire truck. I try to be as fair and honest as I possibly can.
I'm not weighing in on anything other than the shooting. I haven't read all of the details. I'm just saying the shooting was justified.Calling it a "justified shooting" dismisses all the stupid decisions that put everyone in the position that caused it. Is the officer at fault? No. But the leadership that insisted on no-knock middle of the night raids on three different homes looking for one person must be held accountable. They are not "justified".
Well, it's apparent they had no idea where their suspect was so they got no-knock warrants on any apartment in the complex where he "might" be. Storming three different apartments in the middle of the night at the same time when you have no evidence that the guy you're looking for is in any of them is a recipe for disaster no matter the details. They were rewarded with a shirt and hat that might belong to the suspect and some weed. Their suspect wasn't found. And an innocent man was killed.I'm not weighing in on anything other than the shooting. I haven't read all of the details. I'm just saying the shooting was justified.