you're a baby. these are not close calls. it's helping iowa now. it could cost us later in the dual. this guy is awful
Nebraska Match Thread
- Thread starter jmadden1998
- Start date
Mark Manning's hair became really white.
Damn Woods is fun to watch, scrappy back and forth action. What a first period!
How is it not 6-2 for Real? I get that he didn't change the hold...but shouldn't he get credit for the 4 count instead of the 2 count for backs? I know he didn't change the grip...but why wouldn't he get the higher count?
If woods has a better gas tank this week he will dominate hardy but yet to be seen
Yeah I'm not following that either
What tf are you talking about. 2 of the 3 reviews have gone in Nebbys favor
because when you change a call, you go back to the point of the change. attention @Hawktagonapus this is exactly what i'm talking about. his incompetence cost real woods 2 points in a top 5 match up. those are critical. this is by far the worst officiating i've seen at this level and we're not even done with match 3.
because he got it wrong on the mat. and i'd argue one of those didn't hardy should have had 2 and 2 if he calls it right on the mat.
very good composure from woods in a wild, roll around match. that could have gone south quickly. hardy mostly dictated the style of the match and real beat him at his own game. excellent job.
Woods like to really go all in on the tilt and Hardy was close to timing that elevation right to get out. Woods is smooooth
I'm not sure why it's not 6-2 after Nebraska's second challenge at 141. Even if Woods didn't change the hold, he's still able to get the additional 2 points, and he held him for 4 seconds.
tom brands fake hawk fan confirmed lol @Hawktagonapus
I'm sure Tom would be pleased if he had dove across the mat to slap a neutral fall on Teske. lmao
pretty sure it goes back to point of the call change, which would be when the official awarded the first 2 incorrectly. everything after that disappears which is why it went back to 29 seconds.
Looking for cradles tonight from everywhere!
I'm not saying you're wrong, but that seems stupid to me. I get going back to the point of the incident when it involves a takedown, reversal or escape (starts or stops riding time)...but in the case the "advantage" hadn't changed at all...awarding a 6-2 lead and picking up where you left off just makes sense.
But they gave him those 2 back points, that's why it was 4-2, so that doesn't make sense.
Good
I'm to the gills already with these clowns, losing football and basketball.
But the ref shouldn't have given him the 2 since he still had the same hold...I think that is what @js8793 is saying.
Similar threads
