I kind of wish I didn’t post this after seeing what has followed.Received my Covid shot this morning.
Yesterday I was quite active. No problems.
Today was an active morning. No problems.
Tomorrow afternoon I will be playing pickleball.
I kind of wish I didn’t post this after seeing what has followed.Received my Covid shot this morning.
As you know, Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.RSV shot tomorrow, covid on Saturday, flu in early Oct. Live long and prosper.
If only that were true with the case of closing the schools, just to maybe protect a few old teachers (who were still going to be exposed elsewhere).As you know, Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
Mandates are long gone. Just admit you're scared to get the shot.Yeah, so scared you have go out and get jabbed with an ineffective vaccine every 6 months.
Scared? No. Prudent? Yes. I'll get a shot if it's proven to be effective and safe. That means real testing. Oh, and once the drug company is liable for any damages caused by the shot.Mandates are long gone. Just admit you're scared to get the shot.
I think both have been proven. Also, in this situation I'm really looking at the experts. If doctors get one, I'll get one. And they're getting it.Scared? No. Prudent? Yes. I'll get a shot if it's proven to be effective and safe. That means real testing. Oh, and once the drug company is liable for any damages caused by the shot.
(Matches outdated vernacular)Sick burn.
Happy hour: 2 old fashioneds. Still feel ok.I kind of wish I didn’t post this after seeing what has followed.
Yesterday I was quite active. No problems.
Today was an active morning. No problems.
Tomorrow afternoon I will be playing pickleball.
So you're following the advice of one of the world's foremost experts on vaccines?I just got the Covid instead. Natural immunity. Should be good for another year.
Dr. Paul Offit on Why He Is Not Getting This Year's COVID Booster, Says Myocarditis Could Last Longer Than Previously Thought
"I think I'm protected. I didn't get last year's bivalent vaccine. I'm not getting this year's vaccine because I think I have high frequencies of… pic.twitter.com/oavTzHGQFq
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) September 25, 2023
We certainly were surprised by myocarditis and pericarditis and we’ll see whether or not over time when we’re five years into this, 10 years into this, 15 years into this, whether there’s any evidence of residual myocardial disease because the reason you have myocarditis is you’re making immune response to your own heart muscle… We’ll find out about that over time.
Haven't read any of the responses but I'm not sure if I will or not.
I've talked to many that are skipping this latest one.
Most Americans are anti-vaxxers now.
Sadly.
Wonder your thoughts on SV40 and the thread below? Copeland's chain of custody argument is sad, but beyond that having several folks reproduce this from vials is very concerning.I will not be getting it. There are enough therapeutic options to manage covid and not enough longitudinal vaccine data. Numerous clinicians I've spoken to have reservations regarding significant side effects.
Unless required to do international travel, I will not get vaccinated.
Why?
Very interesting post and one that I had long suspected. Let me explain. The big concern is that it's not only mRNA but there's plasmid contamination, presumably from the parent plasmid from which this mRNA was transcribed. There should be no DNA contamination period. The sv40 that you refer to is standard fare in dna plasmids that labs use to transfect mammalian cells. It allows dna replication and by itself isn't dangerous. Sv40 large t antigen is however oncogenic. The problem here is that his sequencing reaction should have failed if it was a pure mRNA vaccine. Either the sample is contaminated with a vanilla eukaryotic expression vector or you have a serious problem in the way you're synthesizing mRNA. I will have to read about how that is done next in the context of these vaccines. At any rate, there's plenty to chew on. Also, the idiot who thinks Sanger sequencing is the gold standard is laughably behind the times, say circa 1989.Wonder your thoughts on SV40 and the thread below? Copeland's chain of custody argument is sad, but beyond that having several folks reproduce this from vials is very concerning.
Thanks for the response and it's very interesting how this has played out. McKernan was the first to discover this and then it has been replicated. Copeland is the person discussing Sanger, happens to be a military shill. There's some good follows in that thread and the idea that these things "potentially" could have very dangerous results for a lot of people who took them is a tough pill to swallow.Very interesting post and one that I had long suspected. Let me explain. The big concern is that it's not only mRNA but there's plasmid contamination, presumably from the parent plasmid from which this mRNA was transcribed. There should be no DNA contamination period. The sv40 that you refer to is standard fare in dna plasmids that labs use to transfect mammalian cells. It allows dna replication and by itself isn't dangerous. Sv40 large t antigen is however oncogenic. The problem here is that his sequencing reaction should have failed if it was a pure mRNA vaccine. Either the sample is contaminated with a vanilla eukaryotic expression vector or you have a serious problem in the way you're synthesizing mRNA. I will have to read about how that is done next in the context of these vaccines. At any rate, there's plenty to chew on. Also, the idiot who thinks Sanger sequencing is the gold standard is laughably behind the times, say circa 1989.
I totally understand all of this but you want to dumb it down for the idiots on here 😉Very interesting post and one that I had long suspected. Let me explain. The big concern is that it's not only mRNA but there's plasmid contamination, presumably from the parent plasmid from which this mRNA was transcribed. There should be no DNA contamination period. The sv40 that you refer to is standard fare in dna plasmids that labs use to transfect mammalian cells. It allows dna replication and by itself isn't dangerous. Sv40 large t antigen is however oncogenic. The problem here is that his sequencing reaction should have failed if it was a pure mRNA vaccine. Either the sample is contaminated with a vanilla eukaryotic expression vector or you have a serious problem in the way you're synthesizing mRNA. I will have to read about how that is done next in the context of these vaccines. At any rate, there's plenty to chew on. Also, the idiot who thinks Sanger sequencing is the gold standard is laughably behind the times, say circa 1989.
Very interesting post and one that I had long suspected. Let me explain. The big concern is that it's not only mRNA but there's plasmid contamination, presumably from the parent plasmid from which this mRNA was transcribed. There should be no DNA contamination period. The sv40 that you refer to is standard fare in dna plasmids that labs use to transfect mammalian cells. It allows dna replication and by itself isn't dangerous. Sv40 large t antigen is however oncogenic. The problem here is that his sequencing reaction should have failed if it was a pure mRNA vaccine. Either the sample is contaminated with a vanilla eukaryotic expression vector or you have a serious problem in the way you're synthesizing mRNA. I will have to read about how that is done next in the context of these vaccines. At any rate, there's plenty to chew on. Also, the idiot who thinks Sanger sequencing is the gold standard is laughably behind the times, say circa 1989.
I have traveled the world since the restrictions have vanished and have not had so much as a cold. Not worried.To protect yourself from covid.
That plasmid would make S protein in bacteria but not mammalian cells. Doesn't look accurate because ahead of every open reading frame (orf) is a promoter. For mammalian cells can be sv40, cmv or ef1a as the usual suspects. That plasmid looks redacted.Thanks for the response and it's very interesting how this has played out. McKernan was the first to discover this and then it has been replicated. Copeland is the person discussing Sanger, happens to be a military shill. There's some good follows in that thread and the idea that these things "potentially" could have very dangerous results for a lot of people who took them is a tough pill to swallow.
See liars, your Mrs told me you’re hung like a light switchIt’s true, the side effects are real. I gained an inch on my already massive schlong thanks to the damn things.
They actually haven't been proven either safe or effective. Efficacy has been wildly overstated, and the FDA and Pfizer have been fighting Federal Court to keep test data from being released.I think both have been proven. Also, in this situation I'm really looking at the experts. If doctors get one, I'll get one. And they're getting it.
Cool. I hope you don't have any going forward. Are you willing to bet your entire net worth that nobody will have severe side effects?I have 0 side effects from the vaccine yesterday!
@Finance85 to people on the left, belief in the deadliness of COVID and the salvation delivered by the vaccine are a religious belief. It requires blind faith and nothing else.Cool. I hope you don't have any going forward. Are you willing to bet your entire net worth that nobody will have severe side effects?
Cool. I hope you don't have any going forward. Are you willing to bet your entire net worth that nobody will have severe side effects?
You don’t want to miss that sacrament.Just booked an appointment for Saturday morning. There were none available when I checked yesterday.
Lol you're also scared of a shot.Cool. I hope you don't have any going forward. Are you willing to bet your entire net worth that nobody will have severe side effects?
Not getting an unnecessary medical immunization is a sign of intelligence not fear.Lol you're also scared of a shot.
You're also scared. Kinda remarkable all these tuff guys running scared.Not getting an unnecessary medical immunization is a sign of intelligence not fear.
Once again, there is absolutely no clinical basis for this claim. 80% of people getting COVID had either no symptoms or mild symptoms - before the vaccine came out. People who died or had severe illness were either old or unhealthy to start with. Lower deaths after the vaccine came out could be easily attributed to the fact that the most vulnerable people died early in the pandemic.No. Some will.
The vaccines have much higher benefit than risks. They literally save millions of lives.
Report: COVID-19 vaccines saved US $1.15 trillion, 3 million lives
COVID-19 vaccines prevented more than 18.5 million US hospitalizations and 3.2 million deaths, according to new estimates.www.cidrap.umn.edu
Once again, there is absolutely no clinical basis for this claim. 80% of people getting COVID had either no symptoms or mild symptoms - before the vaccine came out. People who died or had severe illness were either old or unhealthy to start with. Lower deaths after the vaccine came out could be easily attributed to the fact that the most vulnerable people died early in the pandemic.
You can believe what you want. The government, Pfizer, and Moderna all lied about the efficacy and ability to stop spread, Pfizer actually admitted to the EU medical community they never did any clinical testing related to spread.
Bottom line is that people under 50 and in good health have little to worry about.
It's a personal choice. You've made yours, and I hope it works out for you. That said, you're being disingenuous if you think it's the same risk / reward for everyone, because it's not.
Lol you "hope it works out". Scared!Once again, there is absolutely no clinical basis for this claim. 80% of people getting COVID had either no symptoms or mild symptoms - before the vaccine came out. People who died or had severe illness were either old or unhealthy to start with. Lower deaths after the vaccine came out could be easily attributed to the fact that the most vulnerable people died early in the pandemic.
You can believe what you want. The government, Pfizer, and Moderna all lied about the efficacy and ability to stop spread, Pfizer actually admitted to the EU medical community they never did any clinical testing related to spread.
Bottom line is that people under 50 and in good health have little to worry about.
It's a personal choice. You've made yours, and I hope it works out for you. That said, you're being disingenuous if you think it's the same risk / reward for everyone, because it's not.