I think he will give it some lip service, but he is loyal to a fault and won’t disenfranchise those that committed to the Hawks. IMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I will be shocked if trueI disagree. I'm pretty sure we'll be bringing in at least 5 transfers
Qb, DB, 2 WR and?I disagree. I'm pretty sure we'll be bringing in at least 5 transfers
I would put OL before anything you listed.Qb, DB, 2 WR and?
I think you’re right , but think QB and receivers are what we getI would put OL before anything you listed.
A good qb can cover some bad oline play.I would put OL before anything you listed.
Qb, DB, 2 WR and?
DbQb, DB, 2 WR and?
Qb, dl, 2 ol, and 1 wrQb, DB, 2 WR and?
I’m going with the under on this oneI disagree. I'm pretty sure we'll be bringing in at least 5 transfers
Yeah, if we keep the same OL it doesn't really matter too much who the QB is.I would put OL before anything you listed.
Game has changed too much for Kirk. Offense dominates, hoping the opposing offense is bad and will make mistakes is only beating bad teams, which is all we can beat now. Hope Barta keeps his in with the Big 10 schedule maker. He takes care of us, otherwise it's 4-8 or worse.I think he will give it some lip service, but he is loyal to a fault and won’t disenfranchise those that committed to the Hawks. IMO
We won 7 games this year. I don't know if you're aware of that.Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Seems the right move. Despite what this board incorrectly believes the transfer portal is far from a panacea. Here’s a graph of transfers received (x-axis) vs wins (y-axis) for all Big Ten teams in 2022. Pretty clear correlation, just not the one this board believes to exist.I think he will give it some lip service, but he is loyal to a fault and won’t disenfranchise those that committed to the Hawks. IMO
With one of the worst offenses in all of college football moron.We won 7 games this year. I don't know if you're aware of that.
Usually the bad programs are dependent on transfers (See Nebraska). Good teams are selective and use them to fill a gap or two.Seems the right move. Despite what this board incorrectly believes the transfer portal is far from a panacea. Here’s a graph of transfers received (x-axis) vs wins (y-axis) for all Big Ten teams in 2022. Pretty clear correlation, just not the one this board believes to exist.
All that graph proves is what we already know - the elite teams in the conference don't need to rely on talent from the portal very much, and a few B1G teams are in desperate rebuild mode right now and are using the portal to make it as fast as possible.Seems the right move. Despite what this board incorrectly believes the transfer portal is far from a panacea. Here’s a graph of transfers received (x-axis) vs wins (y-axis) for all Big Ten teams in 2022. Pretty clear correlation, just not the one this board believes to exist.
FFS. You guys act like Ferentz would never consider transfers.I think he will give it some lip service, but he is loyal to a fault and won’t disenfranchise those that committed to the Hawks. IMO
Always a safe bet with the HawksI’m going with the under on this one
I wish with all my heart.Is there an Offensive Coordinator portal?
Doodle's asking for a friend.
So you can find QBs and WRs who want to play in this system? Good luck!I think you’re right , but think QB and receivers are what we get
From what I've heard there is. I agree that our o is ridiculously terrible but I'm expecting some big announcements soon.So you can find QBs and WRs who want to play in this system? Good luck!
We should be shooting for twice that every year, but I’d be shocked if we went after half.I disagree. I'm pretty sure we'll be bringing in at least 5 transfers
Usually good teams have offenses and after 2 years of bullshit on O all options need to be on the table. Funny how Nebraska is always brought up for teams using transfers but tcu had 10 and that has worked out OK for them. We all know KF will never be dependent on them but I'd say given the needs Iowa has 4-6 in the right spots would be helpfulUsually the bad programs are dependent on transfers (See Nebraska). Good teams are selective and use them to fill a gap or two.
I'm up to 6-8 right now. I'm really confident I'm right aboutthis too!We should be shooting for twice that every year, but I’d be shocked if we went after half.
Right. The only reason Iowa is in a bowl this year is the weak crossover B1G schedule. 🤦♂Game has changed too much for Kirk. Offense dominates, hoping the opposing offense is bad and will make mistakes is only beating bad teams, which is all we can beat now. Hope Barta keeps his in with the Big 10 schedule maker. He takes care of us, otherwise it's 4-8 or worse.
OP is taking a shot at the “developmental program” nature of Iowa and KF, which is ridiculous considering the sustained success it has yielded. If you don’t think the “developmental program” has been successful, I don’t know what to tell you.All that graph proves is what we already know - the elite teams in the conference don't need to rely on talent from the portal very much, and a few B1G teams are in desperate rebuild mode right now and are using the portal to make it as fast as possible.
If you don't think Iowa is in rather dire need of filling in big holes with the portal this offseason, I don't know what to tell you, other than you are one of KF's favorite fans.
Filling a gap is fine.Usually the bad programs are dependent on transfers (See Nebraska). Good teams are selective and use them to fill a gap or two.
Kirk needs to retire before all the wheels come off, and it’s coming, before he makes Fry’s last years look successful.I think he will give it some lip service, but he is loyal to a fault and won’t disenfranchise those that committed to the Hawks. IMO
Right. And that won’t happen. One, KF doesn’t know what the portal is. Two, they don’t need to.Filling a gap is fine.
OP implied KF needs “to go hard” at the portal and took a shot at the developmental nature of the Iowa program. Seems like they are looking for much more than gap filling.
The graph isn’t meant for you. We’ve got people in this thread suggesting Iowa should take 10+ transfers annually. I don’t know if there is a faster route to a broken program than that.Can't speak for anyone else, but to me the portal should be used to fill a few immediate gaps in your program. Wholesale use of the portal is probably not a good idea and an indication that you have bigger problems.
As far as the graph, it really does not mean much to me because the programs/teams adding 5+ transfers are likely in trouble anyway.