1-i can sure watch more than 1 inning, but otherwise I hear yaA few thoughts:
1. I find myself caring less and less each of the last couple of seasons, which is a good thing. Not sure if it is 2016, growing family responsibilities, the decline of the franchise, or a combination but I can barely watch more than an inning at a time.
2. Darvish might give Heyward a run for his money in the bad contract department. Through two starts, he has gone 6 2/3 innings and leads MLB in walks.
3. I have been wrong often in these threads, namely wanting to trade Javy because I didn't think his plate discipline could lead to anything better than league average at the plate. He is an absolute anomaly and I am thrilled to be wrong.
4. I repeatedly said last year that Theo's bad contracts and lack of pitching development would shorten the competitive window. Some of the responses here indicated that these contracts weren't that's bad "because it's just money" and that it wouldn't limit what the Cubs could do in the future. We are seeing my doomsday prediction come to fruition. Theo/Hoyer/McLeod could have done better drafting/signing amateur pitchers if they did no scouting and simply went by rankings on public lists.
We saw that Theo was unable to make substantial changes to the team in the offseason, and it is his own fault. He seemingly has to sleep in the bed that he and hi son buddies made.
5. People who blame the Ricketts have a difficult time with math. The Cubs have the 2nd highest payroll in MLB at $209M. The NL Central has the Cardinals at $163M and the Brewers at $124M. I have seen people on Twitter state that if the Cubs don't contend this year, it's because Ricketts didn't provide the resources.
"What those people are saying is 'The Cubs spend $46M more than St. Louis and $85M more than Milwaukee, but poor Theo wasn't given enough money to compete."
The cubs dont' have a lot of money, apparently they have no money to spendNext year, Hamels ($20M), Zobrist ($12M), Cishek ($6.5M), Strop ($6.25M) and Kintzler ($5M) come off the books. That's just a shade under $50M. There are also club options on Rizzo ($14.5M), Morrow ($12M), Quintana ($10.5M), Brach ($5M), Barnette ($3M) and Graveman ($3M). I'm sure they'll pick up Rizzo's option, but there's a fair chance they let Morrow and Brach walk, maybe even Quintana. All totaled, that's $65-75M to spend without increasing payroll. The next year, Lester, Chatwood and the guys with club options in 2020 are gone (except Rizzo, who would have one more club option). That's close to another $40-60M depending on who they keep into 2020.
The Cubs may have a lull if this year is a dud, but they still have a lot of young bats (plus some guys on the farm like Hoerner) plus a lot of money to spend. There's no reason to assume that the Cubs are in an endless downward spiral. Heck, if this year really does go south, they may well be able to make some deals at the deadline to sell off some parts and get an injection of prospects and/or international cash.
I love this idea. The Cubs haven't had an affiliate in Peoria for 15 years, but f*** it. Send some of those guys to Peoria anyway!!!Let some of these guys spend some time in Des Moines or Peoria for a while.
We were at a movie, and I turned on the game for the drive home. I couldn't find the game anywhere on TV, but then I realized this appears to be a waste of time. But, hey, we'll get the right to pay an extra $7 a month to watch this premium baseball next year.Stupid Cubs! Fortunately, Imon isn’t broadcasting the game on 709 tonight. Well, nothing is being shown on 707-710. The Kirkwood channel’s coming through, though.
Put up 10 runs tonight and it's not enough. Are you kidding me? This pitching staff better get it figured out.
You don't know that. Cubs may have gotten to Hader, he's not invincible. But yeah, I get what you're saying.Would have only been 5 if the brewers had used Hader. Now brewers can use him for 2 inngs to seal a win on Saturday or Sunday. Really did them a favor by sucking this bad in the opener.
You don't know that. Cubs may have gotten to Hader, he's not invincible. But yeah, I get what you're saying.
Well, of course. I completely agree with you.You want them to burn as many inngs as possible on that arm. When he's had multiple days off he tends to be extremely juiced. Rather face him when he's throwing 93-96 then 97-99.
Would have only been 5 if the brewers had used Hader. Now brewers can use him for 2 inngs to seal a win on Saturday or Sunday. Really did them a favor by sucking this bad in the opener.
Vince & Lou were awesome back in the day, weren’t they?I do have to say, the Cubs radio broadcast crew is the best in the business. Pat Hughes can turn the worst game into "must listen" radio. My man Ron Santo was his running partner for years (RIP in peace Ronnie) but Ron Coomer is doing a good job.
All those years of losing, the radio broadcast is worth listening to, win or lose, it's entertaining.
Kuechel and Kimbrel?
we've made some good deals since then. too bad, they are short term and all the long term have been beyond horribleJeez, was there one good move made by the Cubs since 2016. Everyone I can think of is shit.
I was down to see him fired after the WS, so it wouldn't bother me!Joe Girardi has always wanted to manage the Cubs.
Theo Epstein may hire him sooner than you think.
Joe Maddon's seat in the dugout is getting hotter by
the minute.
i will NOT be spending my money on the cubs network if they don't put it to use.We were at a movie, and I turned on the game for the drive home. I couldn't find the game anywhere on TV, but then I realized this appears to be a waste of time. But, hey, we'll get the right to pay an extra $7 a month to watch this premium baseball next year.
Maybe we could trade Carl Jr. to the Brewers for a bag of dirt. We'd come out ahead on that deal.