You try to lock him now with a fat contract that ends when he's about 34. It gives the Cubs cost certainty and something to build around. It appears that KB is fine with going through arbitration for 3 years, he'll still get paid well, then try to land a fat deal at age 30 that will get him to about age 37 or 38, it's the Boras way. Problem is that MLB clubs, with the use of analytics, are no longer keen on handing out big, multi-year deals to sluggers over 30.
This will end up being a major miscalculation by Boras because the Cubs are not going to fork over the big contract when KB is 30, and they shouldn't. I don't see many other teams doing it either, but it only takes one. So I hope KB enjoys playing out the end of his career in San Francisco or Seattle or for the Angels, because that is where this is headed.
The entire premise of "the plan" was to build up a core and lock them in and build around them. KB doesn't want to do that, at this time. Maybe Javy, or Contreras, or somebody else will be interested in locking in long term. Depends on who is in the Cubs long term plans after this past season. I think this past season may have changed the thinking on the value of some of these guys, like Schwarber.
I'm fine with the Cubs treating this like a business and not getting attached to players. I'd rather they make moves that will make the Cubs contenders every year, like the Cardinals do, then get too nostalgic. If that means trading or letting guys who are beloved go then that's what needs to happen.
This will end up being a major miscalculation by Boras because the Cubs are not going to fork over the big contract when KB is 30, and they shouldn't. I don't see many other teams doing it either, but it only takes one. So I hope KB enjoys playing out the end of his career in San Francisco or Seattle or for the Angels, because that is where this is headed.
The entire premise of "the plan" was to build up a core and lock them in and build around them. KB doesn't want to do that, at this time. Maybe Javy, or Contreras, or somebody else will be interested in locking in long term. Depends on who is in the Cubs long term plans after this past season. I think this past season may have changed the thinking on the value of some of these guys, like Schwarber.
I'm fine with the Cubs treating this like a business and not getting attached to players. I'd rather they make moves that will make the Cubs contenders every year, like the Cardinals do, then get too nostalgic. If that means trading or letting guys who are beloved go then that's what needs to happen.