This was probably my favorite day as a cub fan. I had no idea what would happen next but just seeing the cubs win the pennant was overwhelming.
There will be no shortage of qualified applicants, assuming Theo doesn't have a detailed list on hand already.Getting a new voice in the inner circle could certainly be beneficial.
dodgers? lol
Trivia question: What player got the base hit that drove in Pete Rose in the 2nd clip?There's a difference between a dirty player and a childish/selfish player. But that's a different discussion.
Let me ask you this - does Golden State care if Draymond Green is a dirty player? Or, do they care if he helps him win? If a player is determined to help a team win, they tend to look the other way on 'dirty play'.
See Pete Rose. By the way, the first clip is in the playoffs. He also ran over a catcher to win an All-Star game in the 2nd clip.
It looks a little like Santo.Trivia question: What player got the base hit that drove in Pete Rose in the 2nd clip?
Not a bad guess. It was Jim Hickman.It looks a little like Santo.
While watching the WS I pulled up BCB, and Al Yellon has a decent piece about trading Chatwood to the Bluejays for Russell Martin. The money is doable, in the sense that it gets rid of the Chatwood money by the end of 2019. Maybe the Cubs would have to throw in some extra money, or a marginal prospect. He also proposed trading Chatwood for Sonny Gray.
Just grist for the mill, but what are your thoughts? Maybe a change of scenery deal helps both players, and if not, at least Martin is still above average defensively, and he could help mentor Willson Contreras.
Meh. I'm not opposed, but Chatwood's money probably isn't all that limiting. If there's any chance to harness his "stuff", I'd probably roll the dice.
Yellon is a dick, but, just for comparison, could you link your Cubs site?Al Yellon of BCB makes Brett Taylor of Bleacher Nation look extremely knowledgeable.
And none of us can say whether Chatwood's contract is limiting. The Ricketts may not want to go into the more punitive tax level $246 M, and that $12M could limit them from doing something. This is why their inept pitching infrastructure is so troubling. You want to have a cost-controlled young player manning your #5 spot.
So when you get Machado and he stands there styl'in after hitting a ball off the wall with 2 outs and is held to a single, just remember you wanted him.......Machado continues to audition to become a Cub.
Yellon is a dick, but, just for comparison, could you link your Cubs site?
I think the Cubs should pass on both Harper and Machado. Unpopular thoughts I know
Mentioned this in another thread, here's another Machado 'play' from last night.
As long as I can keep watching the games for free in Iowa I am okay with this. Otherwise, not a fan of a new Cubs network.Don’t forget, the cubs are going to sign a huge tv deal soon. Money won’t be the issue.
I read both BCB and Bleacher Nation. IMO, they could not be more different. Good to get differing perspectives though. If there is another more definitive Cubs site out there please link it.Yellon is a dick, but, just for comparison, could you link your Cubs site?
I think the Cubs should pass on both Harper and Machado. Unpopular thoughts I know
Don't have a Cubs site, but Al was wanting to trade Quintana for some relievers with velocity earlier this week. The Quintana trade will likely go down in history as a bad deal for the Cubs, but Quintana is still very valuable for two more years, and hopefully he can rediscover his White Sox self.
Cubs Insider is a really good site. They are actually willing to criticize the front office, which Bleacher Nation would never do. Brett Taylor on Twitter this week said Contreras should be a Gold Glove candidate if not for that darn framing thing. A visit to Baseball Prospectus will show that Contreras is the worst defensive catcher in MLB.
Not unpopular with me. I get tired of hearing about the Cub's "Window". With the resources the Cubs have there should be no window. The Cubs should be no different than the Yankees, Red Sox, Cardinals, or Dodgers. They should be able to put together contending teams AND keep the farm stocked enough to keep fresh blood moving up into the big club. The window should never close.
Any clue what Heyward's contract includes with regards to trades? I know he has one opt out he won't be exercising this year. I think he has two more, which might be a small variable that makes moving the contract more difficult.When discussing the Cubs, I've always taken "window" to mean the period of time with the current core. The "window" for Rizzo, Bryant, Lester, Baez, Russell, Contreras etc, is about two more years. That's not necessarily to imply that they'll go back to winning 60 games and try again, but rather guys like Lester and Zo will have moved on and the Cubs will have to make choices with the younger guys and pick the 1-2 they want to build around and then work some deals to move others and probably have someone leave for free agency.
I think that in addition to FA signings, the next 2-3 offseasons are going to include more trades than we've seen lately. There are guys who have value and guys like Heyward pick up more value as the clock ticks and the contract becomes something more moveable.
Any clue what Heyward's contract includes with regards to trades? I know he has one opt out he won't be exercising this year. I think he has two more, which might be a small variable that makes moving the contract more difficult.
What’s the deal, he went to high school with Almora?
According to Spotrac, he had a full no-trade for 2016-2018, now it's partial, but I'm not sure what the limits are. He has the opt-out this year and another in 2019 if he gets 550 PA.
Contract Notes:
- Can opt out after the 2018 season
- If applicable Heyward can opt in after 2019 with 550 PA in that season.
- Signing Bonus: $20 million (fully deferred at $5M each April 1st from 2024-2027, protected)
- If an opt-out is exercised, the signing bonus is paid immediately
- Present day contract valued at $179,885,463 due to deferred bonus
- Full no trade clause 2016-18
- Partial no trade clause 2019-20