ADVERTISEMENT

*****Official Purdue @ Iowa game thread*****

I LOVE IT I LOVE IT I LOOOVE IT!! Gutsy effort and D won us the game!! Lets go baby 1-0...
 
shutterstock_65985175.jpg
 
He doesn't beat defenders with speed bringing the ball up court, he doesn't break the D down off the dribble, he doesn't penetrate the lane and dish. If Connor is a 1 then Nunge is a 5. Hint: neither is true.

Ok sure, he's not great. He's solid. What is he though if he isn't a 1?
 
Well I was wrong, it happens once and a awhile. Though Purdue would have more offense to pull the upset.

glad to be wrong:cool:
 
Sloppy offense, but easy win

It ended up easy win, but it could have been a tough game. Purdue is 38% 3pt shooting team and they missed a bunch of open looks.

I will say that the defense looked better effort wise. The defensive rebounding was MUCH improved. That is key to improving the defense because zone hold teams shooting percentage down but you get killed if you only get 60% of the defensive rebounds like they did vs Gonzaga.
 
Iowa held a big ten team to 55 points.. I’m gonna cry!! A decent BIG team at that...

That effort will win them a lot of games. Great job by Iowa on the defensive glass. There will be other games when Iowa shoots much better. But they won by 15 against a team ranked 26th in the Pomeroy rankings, and they didn't have to shoot great to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonesy5960
Ugly, but AWESOME for this team to win ugly. In a game that the other team wants to play slow and rough you up
 
It was obvious that Purdue came into the game hoping to keep the score low. They held the ball until very late in the shot clock all game. Keeping us out of our fast paced rhythm kept the score close most of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unoHawkeye
Only 56 shots and 14 free throws tonight. Only times that Iowa has shot fewer than 70 shots they’ve had at least 25 free throw attempts. If the Hawks can defend and rebound when teams slow the pace down on us, and play like we do when teams run with us, Hawks will lose VERY few games this year
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
He's a solid tweener, closer to a 2 than a 1 IMO. Good player, don't get me wrong. But why JT doesn't start at PG is just silly, which it sounds like we agree on.

Ok semantics. I'd rather have Cmac handling the rock when he's on the court, and not running off screens or standing in the corner waiting to miss a three. That's just me though. Yes, Joe T should be getting at least 30 mins a game. I think everyone agrees on that except for Fran.
 
Announcer said Joe T started 14 games last year. Genuinely interested in what our record was during that time.. I get the whole Jbo thing but this team plays better when he’s on the floor.
JBO needs to start but JT needs to play a lot. JBO needs to look to Garza and JW for the assist and then spot up and try to get to the line, he should be there 5-10 times per game.
 
The effort on defense was good but defensive rebounding was much better. Purdue still had too many open looks that didn't go in. I am not sure the defense overall was that much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unoHawkeye
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT