Sorry, (2nd sentence) I really don’t think a felony conviction changes the electorate. (3rd sentence) people will think this was a kangaroo court run by the Biden DOJ
*****OFFICIAL TRUMP CRIMINAL TRIAL THREAD*****
- Thread starter Huey Grey
- Start date
Never forget . . . a not insignificant number of Bible Thumping, Family Values Touting Evangelical Christians believe that DT Barnum was sent by God to lead the United States of America.
Hey, Kong was strong... Trump is a saggy, jiggly man with a pair of orangutan tiddies.
Have the maga’s forgotten who the current President is? If the President is above the law we are all ****ed. This is some dumb shit.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 94,204
- 190,789
- 113
Is Biden responsible for this guy's problem's too?
- Sep 13, 2002
- 94,204
- 190,789
- 113
His followers don't matter. They are a baked in 35% or so of the electorate and would vote him even if he sprouted demon horns and drank the blood of a baby on live television.
It matters among independents and the not-small number of voters who don't start paying attention until later in the election cycle.
You and I don’t think soIs Biden responsible for this guy's problem's too?
In a lot of ways our democracy is already over. It one side is willing to shred our democracy to let a criminal dictator become president then really there's not much coming back from that.
Green Light for Biden to kill off 5 Justices he doesn't like and replace them, then pardon himself.
Easy-Peasy.
Meh....that dude was a DINO....Is Biden responsible for this guy's problem's too?
no it can't be because he doesn't like them
it has to be an "official act"...so some kind of policy dispute/difference ought to do it
The fact that their actions threaten our democracy ought to be an official act…
It's an official act, when he declares it one.
So this analysis is submitted by Kyle Becker. The same who is a writer and producer for Fox News' #1 cable primetime show Hannity ?
Ill stick to listening to the lawyers who have presented cases to the Supreme Court and teach law vs worrying about what a self appointed news CEO with an International Studies degree thinks the Supreme Court will decide.
PS, that international studies degree is from Iowa, so..... you people are also to blame for this.
Last edited:
Peckers back in court today. His testimony so far has been damning. At this point, though, I don't see why Trump's lawyers can't argue that the crimes don't matter because Trump is king so can do whatever he wants.
Guess what. Just because you don't think your hero didn't commit crimes, doesn't make it so. Let us know when New York contacts you to rewrite their laws.
File:Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf - Wikipedia
He obviously follows conservative media. Constant bombardment with no message but “witch hunt!”Guess what. Just because you don't think your hero didn't commit crimes, doesn't make it so. Let us know when New York contacts you to rewrite their laws.
File:Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Trumps lawyers are on thin ice with the judge as it is, I don't think that bringing a meritless argument that only works in the court of public opinion would be a good idea for them.
Also Trumps lawyers: Hold my beer!
Imagine constantly defending a rapist conman because of the letter next to his name.
Politicians are sleazy. Imagine that.
The ex-publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid testified during former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial Thursday that in the run-up to Rahm Emanuel’s first run for Chicago mayor, the publisher helped quash a story about an alleged affair Emanuel had.
David Pecker, who has had a long relationship with Emanuel and has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his political campaigns over the years, testified he paid $20,000 for a story about an alleged Emanuel affair before Emanuel’s Chicago mayoral campaign kicked off in 2010, according to testimony reported by Politico.
The Enquirer then did not report on the allegations, effectively preventing them from becoming public, according to the Politico report.
Pecker testified he had a relationship with Emanuel’s brother, Ari, a well-known Hollywood talent agent, and had worked with him to buy stories about celebrities and suppress them, a process known as “catch-and-kill,” according to Politico.
www.chicagotribune.com
The ex-publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid testified during former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial Thursday that in the run-up to Rahm Emanuel’s first run for Chicago mayor, the publisher helped quash a story about an alleged affair Emanuel had.
David Pecker, who has had a long relationship with Emanuel and has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his political campaigns over the years, testified he paid $20,000 for a story about an alleged Emanuel affair before Emanuel’s Chicago mayoral campaign kicked off in 2010, according to testimony reported by Politico.
The Enquirer then did not report on the allegations, effectively preventing them from becoming public, according to the Politico report.
Pecker testified he had a relationship with Emanuel’s brother, Ari, a well-known Hollywood talent agent, and had worked with him to buy stories about celebrities and suppress them, a process known as “catch-and-kill,” according to Politico.
Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testifies he suppressed a story about alleged Rahm Emanuel affair
David Pecker testified he paid $20,000 for a story about an alleged Rahm Emanuel affair before Emanuel kicked off his bid for Chicago mayor in 2010.
www.chicagotribune.com
Yes. The same as it’s time to scrap the Abrahamic religions.
Remember when Republicans and evangelicals were up in arms over a blow job? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
hawkeyetraveler
HR All-American
Well shit. And here I was planning to vote Rahm for President. I guess I will just have to vote for orange man since they are all sleazy.Politicians are sleazy. Imagine that.
The ex-publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid testified during former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial Thursday that in the run-up to Rahm Emanuel’s first run for Chicago mayor, the publisher helped quash a story about an alleged affair Emanuel had.
David Pecker, who has had a long relationship with Emanuel and has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his political campaigns over the years, testified he paid $20,000 for a story about an alleged Emanuel affair before Emanuel’s Chicago mayoral campaign kicked off in 2010, according to testimony reported by Politico.
The Enquirer then did not report on the allegations, effectively preventing them from becoming public, according to the Politico report.
Pecker testified he had a relationship with Emanuel’s brother, Ari, a well-known Hollywood talent agent, and had worked with him to buy stories about celebrities and suppress them, a process known as “catch-and-kill,” according to Politico.
Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testifies he suppressed a story about alleged Rahm Emanuel affair
David Pecker testified he paid $20,000 for a story about an alleged Rahm Emanuel affair before Emanuel kicked off his bid for Chicago mayor in 2010.
There's no clarity in the indictment about the additional crime that was committed that's needed to elevate the misdemeanor to a felony. It's assumed the crime is election reporting problems.Guess what. Just because you don't think your hero didn't commit crimes, doesn't make it so. Let us know when New York contacts you to rewrite their laws.
File:Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf - Wikipedia
If Donald Trump weren’t on the ballot, I would leave it blank.
Unfortunately, I have a moral obligation to vote for the candidate with the best chance to beat Trump.
Any decent American with an ounce of integrity does too.
It's assumed that Trump committed financial fraud in connection to the election. You may not like that this is a felony because you're voting Trump. But here we are.
First, I really don't have any emotional investment in this case. My comment is strictly about the legal process.
Second, I haven't ever voted for Trump, and won't be voting for Trump.
Third, if all of your assumptions are as faulty as those embedded in your posts, you have way more worries than I do.
Neither one is qualified to call Bingo games at the local residential care facility.
Go ahead and claim your moral victory by choosing one over the other; it’s a fool’s errand.
I know I say this a lot, but it's just ****ing mind blowing that folks on here feel the need to defend Trump in every single thread about him.
Normally, I would agree. But this is an extraordinary situation. Biden drooling into a bib and shitting himself is still a 1,000 x preferable, and a lot less dangerous, than another Trump presidency.
That's what Republicans want us to do. Scrap it all and they take complete power following directions of white evangelicals.
Latest posts
-
Source Confirms to Rivals, Iowa has been in Contact with General Booty- Latest: swagsurfer02
-
-
-
