Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are being vague. I really want to know what you’re talking about? Impeachment of Trump? Or be more of a Democrat?You are not that dumb. You know better.
You are being vague. I really want to know what you’re talking about? Impeachment of Trump? Or be more of a Democrat?
YOU brought the Iran-Russia dealings into the equation. I noted how the Obama Administration brokered that deal and that "number one geopolitical foe" was neutralized on that front pretty effectively. It was stupid to bring that into the equation on your part. In 2012 we had these guys still supporting terrorist groups:And that has exactly what to do with Romney? The nuclear deal with Iran was not in place when Romney and Obama debated each other in 2012. That deal came later. And Romney had nothing to do with Trump scrapping that deal, so I'm not sure why you think it's germane to this discussion.
The bottom line is that Romney was right when he said Russia is our number one geopolitical foe. He was right in 2012 and he is right in 2022.
Anyone that is not a Trump supporter. Trump and his dipshit minions need to go awayI'd be fine with a Romney presidency in 24.
I'm not trying to be vague. He needs to stand up to MAGAS and restore traditional GOP values. Do the right thing. Reach across the aisle. Don't be faux news parody. Think about 1970's 1980s GOPers
You want to believe it was "stupid" for me to bring Russia's support for Iran's nuclear arms program into the discussion because it shot your argument to hell. Russia was helping Iran develop a nuclear program. They were a significant geopolitical threat even if that was the only thing they were doing that threatened us or our allies. You inexplicably tried to drag Trump into a discussion about Mitt Romney.YOU brought the Iran-Russia dealings into the equation. I noted how the Obama Administration brokered that deal and that "number one geopolitical foe" was neutralized on that front pretty effectively. It was stupid to bring that into the equation on your part.
Saudi Arabia has been supporting terrorists since before either of us was born. And every United States president for the past 75 years has sold them weapons because as evil as they are, they remain a useful tool for American interests in the region.In 2012 we had these guys still supporting terrorist groups:
Romney also voted to convict Trump in the second impeachment trial.so he needs to get in line with the Dems? I don’t remember why he voted not to convict over the 1/6 impeachment. Was it because he felt Trump was no longer a sitting President?
And I'm sure FDR and LBJ would love the "Defund the police/ My pronouns are/ Free college for everyone/ no more bail/ No borders" Dems we have running the shit show today.Ike, Lincoln, and T.R. would be ashamed of today's GOP
And I'm sure FDR and LBJ would love the "Defund the police/ My pronouns are/ Free college for everyone/ no more bail/ No borders" Dems we have running the shit show today.
Yeah...because Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt are the topic. You know...the people you just referenced.Non sequiter. Keep changing the topic to what you want to talk/rant about.
Is he not doing that? I don’t know. I assume he didn’t support build back better because he is a conservative.I'm not trying to be vague. He needs to stand up to MAGAS and restore traditional GOP values. Do the right thing. Reach across the aisle. Don't be faux news parody. Think about 1970's 1980s GOPers
The West had 8 years to properly arm Ukraine and we blew it.In 2012, the middle east was a bigger problem for us than Russia. Situations change over time but people try to apply the reality of today to 10 years ago.
Maybe if we could just go back in time and flip every democrat presidency to republican, we wouldn't have any problems today!
And he was ridiculed for saying that Syria is Iran's path to the sea. The usual lefty websites slammed him for it because they were too stupid to understand that he was talking about the proposed Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline that would enable Iran to send natural gas from the massive South Pars field to Syria's ports, where it could then be transported to Europe.Don't forget that, egads, he also put his dog in a crate on top of his car.
Yes, shot to Hell when A) Iran never developed nuclear weapons, and B) They aligned with the United States and the west because they wanted to develop nuclear energy more than weapons. You're a legend in your own mind, TJ.You want to believe it was "stupid" for me to bring Russia's support for Iran's nuclear arms program into the discussion because it shot your argument to hell. Russia was helping Iran develop a nuclear program. They were a significant geopolitical threat even if that was the only thing they were doing that threatened us or our allies. You inexplicably tried to drag Trump into a discussion about Mitt Romney.
Saudi Arabia has been supporting terrorists since before either of us was born. And every United States president for the past 75 years has sold them weapons because as evil as they are, they remain a useful tool for American interests in the region.
Are you saying that Russia wasn't helping them develop nuclear weapons prior to Romney's statement in 2012?Yes, shot to Hell when A) Iran never developed nuclear weapons, and B) They aligned with the United States and the west because they wanted to develop nuclear energy more than weapons. You're a legend in your own mind, TJ.
Every single post you make has to defend your team, it is just amazing really.Romney was a mute when he had the chance to speak up as Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine into creating dirt on Hunter Biden. But, yeah, Obama.
This is so funny, like you would ever consider voting for a Republican. You have been indoctrinated and are a sheep to the Democratic Party. Must say/do what they tell meI won't vote for a Republican for a very long time. Especially in my home state. I'm not that forgiving. Not until we have laws that protect voting rights. Republicans don't want those.
Nothing normal with this Presidency at all. Its a disaster.I voted Obama in '08 and Romney in '12. Really wish he'd won and been able to carry forward in '16. IMHO we'd be in such a better place. Al-Maga would still be living in their caves, less division across the populace, and we wouldn't have had to vote in a guy with failing faculties just to get us some sense of normalcy for 4 years. I didn't necessarily want Obama to not have a second term, but missing out on Romney in '12 was a huge bummer.
Nothing normal with this Presidency at all. Its a disaster.
Every single post you make has to defend your team, it is just amazing really.
Obama and Biden's conduct could be construed as misfeasance. Trump's could be construed as malfeasance.He's not a Monday morning QB. He's a Saturday morning QB.
He predicted this and warned us in 2012 about this. Then Obama made fun of his prediction and the fawning media and idiot Dems focused on "Binders full of women" instead, and are now scrambling to deflect away from years of malfeasance on the Russian front.
Yep, calling out their bias. Guessing you are in the same boat. GFY anywayI glanced at your post history and you appear to spend most of your time on this forum going after democrats.
Romney was a mute when he had the chance to speak up as Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine into creating dirt on Hunter Biden. But, yeah, Obama.
Romney was right. Putin took Crimea 2 years later. Obama was just scoring points in a debate.Obama was right then, and Romney is right now. Especially after four years of the previous President bending over backward$ for his favorite oligarchical dictator. Our biggest threat then were states sanctioning Middle East terrorism. Luckily, we neutralized that threat for the time being under Obama's leadership. It's really easy to have amnesia about where we were then vs now.
I agree assuming you meant to write "could be" for both.Obama and Biden's conduct could be construed as misfeasance. Trump's could be construed as malfeasance.
Did I not use "could be" for all three?I agree assuming you meant to write "could be" for both.
Looking back Romney has really been an underrated politician. I wish he would run for prez in 2024. Not saying I would prefer him to the Democratic nominee, but he would be a fine option.Romney was right. Putin took Crimea 2 years later. Obama was just scoring points in a debate.
Then I am not following why you wrote: "I agree assuming you meant to write 'could be' for both".You did.
But…but..he’s RepublicanRomney was the lone Republican senator who voted guilty on Abuse of Power during Trump’s first impeachment. He also was critical of Republicans for forming a committee to investigate Hunter Biden’s activities in Ukraine.
https://apnews.com/article/election...ma-joe-biden-f1de4ee7909548a132796767779ee56d
Seems like an invasion of a sovereign neighbor would go over better under the watch of the bend over guy. Weird Putin waited, I guess.Obama was right then, and Romney is right now. Especially after four years of the previous President bending over backward$ for his favorite oligarchical dictator. Our biggest threat then were states sanctioning Middle East terrorism. Luckily, we neutralized that threat for the time being under Obama's leadership. It's really easy to have amnesia about where we were then vs now.
Lol...oops.Romney was a mute when he had the chance to speak up as Trump tried to strong arm Ukraine into creating dirt on Hunter Biden. But, yeah, Obama.
Because it would have had sense if one of them was supposed to be "could not" (either one) and I wrote that just in case you meant to, as I have made mistakes like that in the past, thinking that you may have wrote "all three could be" instead of separating it like that. That's all. Nothing deeper than that.Then I am not following why you wrote: "I agree assuming you meant to write 'could be' for both".
I separated Obama/Biden from Trump due to the misfeasance/malfeasance distinction, and used the conjunctive "and" for Obama and Biden. I am not picking a fight I just wasn't sure why what I said would be confusing, and I am always looking to make sure my writing is not confusing.Because it would have had sense if one of them was supposed to be "could not" (either one) and I wrote that just in case you meant to, as I have made mistakes like that in the past, thinking that you may have wrote "all three could be" instead of separating it like that. That's all. Nothing deeper than that.
Well, he did call it in 2012. So today is his day to gloat. Hope he enjoys the war during his 'I told you so' moment."The 80s called and we didn't answer."
Romney swipes Obama, Trump and Biden after Russia invades Ukraine: 'The '80s called and we didn't answer'
Sen. Mitt Romney laid the blame for Russia’s Wednesday night invasion of Ukraine at the policies of the three most recent U.S. presidents, Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden.www.foxnews.com