ADVERTISEMENT

Socialism vs Capitalism

Show us that he isn't. And don't try false claims like he was racist and therefore a right winger.

He claimed to be a socialist and was one, just like he claimed to be a Christian and was one. That doesn't mean all socialists and Christians are evil like him, but he was those things.
he actually took a mostly catholic nation and banned religion so that he could become the god-figure which is very telling, most communists and socialists do this. he went to the tibetin munks to study the sun gods, which is the symbol of the Nazi party. he thought he was god.
 
The first is an example of a country relentlessly punished by a capitalist nation (us).

The second is an example of the consolidation of wealth as capitalists exploit others and convert to a finance-dominated culture.

The main difference is that you are showing the victims in the first set - because that suits your meme - and showing the winners in the second set - because, again, that suits your meme.

I like this graphic it for it's effectiveness at reflecting capitalistic propaganda. But obviously it is a childishly simplistic representation.
The bold section didn't you do the same thing in your picture posting? It suited your meme so you posted it with your mindset? Everyone can interpret an image or statement however they feel based upon their ideals.

2428740.jpg
 
he actually took a mostly catholic nation and banned religion so that he could become the god-figure which is very telling, most communists and socialists do this. he went to the tibetin munks to study the sun gods, which is the symbol of the Nazi party. he thought he was god.
He didn't ban religion. Please don't tell me you actually believe that. Check Google, there are literally thousands of picures of bishops and cardinals at Nazi events.
 
The bold section didn't you do the same thing in your picture posting? It suited your meme so you posted it with your mindset? Everyone can interpret an image or statement however they feel based upon their ideals.

2428740.jpg

That's pretty spot on.
 
he actually took a mostly catholic nation and banned religion so that he could become the god-figure which is very telling, most communists and socialists do this. he went to the tibetin munks to study the sun gods, which is the symbol of the Nazi party. he thought he was god.
Once again, you facts are wrong. Germany was the birthplace of the reformation. It was mostly Protestant at about 66%, but it was over 90% Christian just like the Nazis.
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005206
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
The bold section didn't you do the same thing in your picture posting? It suited your meme so you posted it with your mindset? Everyone can interpret an image or statement however they feel based upon their ideals.

2428740.jpg
I notice the red guy on the right is the one willing to shoot people no matter how it works out. The only scenario that doesn't risk death is when you get rid of the red guy.
 
he actually took a mostly catholic nation and banned religion so that he could become the god-figure which is very telling, most communists and socialists do this. he went to the tibetin munks to study the sun gods, which is the symbol of the Nazi party. he thought he was god.

He didn't ban religion. Please don't tell me you actually believe that. Check Google, there are literally thousands of picures of bishops and cardinals at Nazi events.

Ehhh

First of all I'm pretty sure Germany was pretty heavily Lutheran. I don't think Roman Catholics where the majority there, although they where a sizable minority.

Secondly while you could say he didn't ban religion he did ban the free practice of religion. He started telling churches what they had to preach and say.

Thus you have the confessing Church and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessing_Church

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietrich_Bonhoeffer
 
I notice the red guy on the right is the one willing to shoot people no matter how it works out. The only scenario that doesn't risk death is when you get rid of the red guy.

Ehh not in the capitalists as described by capitalists. Although I'm noting that in that case if you look both the blue and red guy have guns. Odd
 
I notice the red guy on the right is the one willing to shoot people no matter how it works out. The only scenario that doesn't risk death is when you get rid of the red guy.
He has a CC permit and the blue guy (who has a gun as well) is trying to steal from him - justified.
 
Bernie wants us to be more like EU - if he and others want that feel free to move there.
 
That's a pretty good question.
I've asked that a lot. My reasoning behind asking that, is to point out that the ruling class doesn't necessarily get affected by a pure Socialism society. In that case, then in many ways, they will ALWAYS be at the head of the tables, once the ability to have competition goes away.
 
I've asked that a lot. My reasoning behind asking that, is to point out that the ruling class doesn't necessarily get affected by a pure Socialism society. In that case, then in many ways, they will ALWAYS be at the head of the tables, once the ability to have competition goes away.

I brought up in another thread that socialism is dependent upon big government. He told me that I didn't know what I was talking about and was completely ignorant on the subject of socialism. At that point I asked him how he was going to implement socialism. That was the last post in the thread.
 
I brought up in another thread that socialism is dependent upon big government. He told me that I didn't know what I was talking about and was completely ignorant on the subject of socialism. At that point I asked him how he was going to implement socialism. That was the last post in the thread.
Him and his sidekick 'Silent Cig', tend to back off when the questioning starts to get tough.
 
there are tons of liberal Christians, and religious liberals...the vast majority of Hispanic catholics, the liberal jews who elect Hillary, it goes on and on. the pope is so far left he leans left when he walks.

I was talking about Hitler.
 
I was talking about Hitler.

You seem to be a bit confused about reality. What makes Hitler a "liberal Christian"? What makes him liberal? Maybe you can explain what he did that could be described as "liberal". And if you are calling him a Christian, I can't think of many people on earth that violated the commandment of "Thou Shall Not Kill" more than him, so that seems a bit illogical too!
 
You seem to be a bit confused about reality. What makes Hitler a "liberal Christian"? What makes him liberal? Maybe you can explain what he did that could be described as "liberal". And if you are calling him a Christian, I can't think of many people on earth that violated the commandment of "Thou Shall Not Kill" more than him, so that seems a bit illogical too!

I was referring to the post that quoted Hiltler and his allegiance to Christianity.

The Liberal part was from IMCC
 
Ludwig von Mises on Capitalism



Capitalism is essentially a system of mass production for the satisfaction of the needs of the masses. It pours a horn of plenty upon the common man. It has raised the average standard of living to a height never dreamed of in earlier ages. It has made accessible to millions of people enjoyments which a few generations ago were only within the reach of a small élite.-The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
 
Ludwig von Mises on Capitalism



Capitalism is essentially a system of mass production for the satisfaction of the needs of the masses. It pours a horn of plenty upon the common man. It has raised the average standard of living to a height never dreamed of in earlier ages. It has made accessible to millions of people enjoyments which a few generations ago were only within the reach of a small élite.-The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
That's just dogma. It's not even a definition of capitalism. It's just a gushing statement of how wonderful capitalism is from a high priest of the order.
 
Ludwig von Mises on Capitalism



Capitalism is essentially a system of mass production for the satisfaction of the needs of the masses. It pours a horn of plenty upon the common man. It has raised the average standard of living to a height never dreamed of in earlier ages. It has made accessible to millions of people enjoyments which a few generations ago were only within the reach of a small élite.-The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality

von Mises is certainly a good mentor to follow if you enjoy being consistently proven wrong on economic policies.
 
Are you saying that you think we have capitalism here?

Well, if we don't have it here now, where the wealthy "capitalists" now controls how our government is run more so than they have in the past, through institutionalized bribery (which they've had their minions now make legal for them to engage in), then how does this country achieve the "capitalist paradise" country achieve true this true "capitalist dream" if government is bad, and in effect we are already seeing a screwed up system without an *independent* government in control of it that would likely be the same if we didn't have any government regulating the marketplace the way it should.

The problem is we're being spoon fed this propaganda to allow those who now have a stranglehold of corrupting our government to solidify that control and minimize what they have to control to control us, and lead us down a path of destruction in so many ways, because their only motivation is to just reward themselves, and the only thing that "trickles down" is what makes us all "pee-ons"!

Unregulated "capitalism" breeds oligopoly which breeds oligarchy running the country which leads us to all being economic slaves to those that control all of the wealth that they've used government to redistribute to themselves, and which ultimately dooms the planet when nothing is done about problems that they don't financially benefit from such as globally warming which will have us all go instinct first, if we all don't die first of starvation and other effects of economic slavery.
 
Well, if we don't have it here now, where the wealthy "capitalists" now controls how our government is run more so than they have in the past, through institutionalized bribery (which they've had their minions now make legal for them to engage in), then how does this country achieve the "capitalist paradise" country achieve true this true "capitalist dream" if government is bad, and in effect we are already seeing a screwed up system without an *independent* government in control of it that would likely be the same if we didn't have any government regulating the marketplace the way it should.

The problem is we're being spoon fed this propaganda to allow those who now have a stranglehold of corrupting our government to solidify that control and minimize what they have to control to control us, and lead us down a path of destruction in so many ways, because their only motivation is to just reward themselves, and the only thing that "trickles down" is what makes us all "pee-ons"!

Unregulated "capitalism" breeds oligopoly which breeds oligarchy running the country which leads us to all being economic slaves to those that control all of the wealth that they've used government to redistribute to themselves, and which ultimately dooms the planet when nothing is done about problems that they don't financially benefit from such as globally warming which will have us all go instinct first, if we all don't die first of starvation and other effects of economic slavery.

Let me ask you one question. Who did these "capitalists" use to get to this position of power?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT