IF, it’s still a viable deal, probably working the phone re: $$$$$$$I thought he would have committed by now
IF, it’s still a viable deal, probably working the phone re: $$$$$$$I thought he would have committed by now
I don't know, Indiana did pretty good with basically half their starters as FCS transfers. I know JMU is now FBS but last year was the first year. These guys were recruited by Cignetti when JMU was FCS.
Seems to me these top FCS teams do occasionally whip the big boys, with a whole team of FCS talent.
Iowa included.
Lester fixed Iowa's running game and the passing game while still bad was not as bad as last Year and with Brian's Players, I would say Lester was a big improvement in season 1 , I think Iowa will be a decent to good offense when He gets His guys on the roster especially QBgood points
coaching matters; hopefully Lester is as good as he appears to be
IF, it’s still a viable deal, probably working the phone re: $$$$$$$
Lester fixed Iowa's running game and the passing game while still bad was not as bad as last Year and with Brian's Players, I would say Lester was a big improvement in season 1 , I think Iowa will be a decent to good offense when He gets His guys on the roster especially QB
Yep. Passing game continues to be dogcrap.Passing offense was basically the same as the prior year yards wise and td wise which is bad, Lester might be a good oc with his qb only time will tell
Until Iowa has a QB who has a really good Season paired with either a really productive WR1 or a combination of WRs who collectively put up really good numbersapparently coming up with a $1.5M "NIL" package for Beau Pribula was no problem for Brad/SWARM (the issue, and deciding factor for Beau came down to fit; Beau thought Mizzou was the better fit)
How long does the Brian Ferentz era haunt us when it comes to recruiting QBs and WRs?
Passing offense was basically the same as the prior year yards wise and td wise which is bad, Lester might be a good oc with his qb only time will tell
Yep. Passing game continues to be dogcrap.
Yes but less attempts, better YPC….they hammered the running game cause they had an AA at that position. Hard to blame themPassing offense was basically the same as the prior year yards wise and td wise which is bad, Lester might be a good oc with his qb only time will tell
But it was significantly more efficient. Completion percentage went from 48.9 to 62.7, sacks dropped by half (from 33 to 17), and RTG improved by more than a third (from 91.2 to 124.5). Those are all noteworthy improvements, especially considering no QB who played this season participated in spring practice (Cade did get the classroom portion and observed), and neither did the starting WRs (Gill and Vander Zee).Passing offense was basically the same as the prior year yards wise and td wise which is bad, Lester might be a good oc with his qb only time will tell
Consistent with what Lester said prior to the season, I think the team figured out what they were going to be good at, and focused on doing that. Lester always said that there would be aspects of the offense the team wouldn’t be particularly good at, and that pretty clearly included numerous parts of the passing game.Yes but less attempts, better YPC….they hammered the running game cause they had an AA at that position. Hard to blame them
Yes but less attempts, better YPC….they hammered the running game cause they had an AA at that position. Hard to blame them
Agreed. It takes just 1 guy to take a chance, staff to use him properly, for QB to succeed and to get out of this mess. Extremely important that they get this done, do it right and he is successfulConsistent with what Lester said prior to the season, I think the team figured out what they were going to be good at, and focused on doing that. Lester always said that there would be aspects of the offense the team wouldn’t be particularly good at, and that pretty clearly included numerous parts of the passing game.
I’m sure the pitch Lester is making to prospects is that once we have the right QB in place, the passing game will be much better. … And telling each prospect that he is “the right QB” to make it happen.
Agreed. It takes just 1 guy to take a chance, staff to use him properly, for QB to succeed and to get out of this mess. Extremely important that they get this done, do it right and he is successful
He was fine….Sully is not the guy to turn this around. He’s a good backup, not a QB1Hell, Sully even looked good for the 1st half vs Mizzou
He was fine….Sully is not the guy to turn this around. He’s a good backup, not a QB1
He's exactly what pribula was at Penn state, which is a good situational QB that is trying to play as a starter.He was fine….Sully is not the guy to turn this around. He’s a good backup, not a QB1
He's exactly what pribula was at Penn state, which is a good situational QB that is trying to play as a starter.
Working the phone? No. You bring him in. You're ready with the $$ you know you're gonna need. You close the deal. Kirk isn't a closer.IF, it’s still a viable deal, probably working the phone re: $$$$$$$
If you mean Gronowski, I doubt it. Doesnt want to be that far from his familyBroncowski will follow his coach.
I think he means OCIf you mean Gronowski, I doubt it. Doesnt want to be that far from his family
This ****ing tablet. You never know what the piece of shit will do. I end up editing many posts.If you mean Gronowski, I doubt it. Doesnt want to be that far from his family
I agree. I’m sorry. I meant Gronowski, or his people, were simultaneously working the phones to compare $$$Working the phone? No. You bring him in. You're ready with the $$ you know you're gonna need. You close the deal. Kirk isn't a closer.
He gone.
Fran where u mining this stuff from?
Serviceable is not what we need or looking for. There’s a lot of “might” in that post….If you can get a surefire starter, you do thatWe already have five quarterbacks to sort out. Sully needs a little work, but he's very serviceable. The auburn kid might work out also. Shaggy shows promise, we have Jimmy Sullivan to work on and Fitzgerald's kid coming in as well.
Might be a gem in the room.
Until Iowa has a QB who has a really good Season paired with either a really productive WR1 or a combination of WRs who collectively put up really good numbers
Gill, Anderson, Addison and OrtwerthFor you or anyone else that wants to respond:
* Who are the projected top two Iowa WRs and top 2 Iowa TEs next year?
* And how good can all 4 be ASSUMING we have a QB who can sling the ball with ACCURACY?
Passing game was improved just based on not every pass play last Year when Hill was in the pocket everyone anus drew up tighter than a vise grip hoping He would not fumble the game away like Minnesota and MichiganYep. Passing game continues to be dogcrap.
RVZ really either needs to hit the gym hard this offseason and get much stronger and aggressive or He should red shirt, He was bullied at OSU and in the Bowl game badly so i concure Gill / Buie or Anderson and those 2 TEs barring portal adds or defectionsGill, Anderson, Addison and Ortwerth