Texas woman asks judge to let her terminate pregnancy after lethal fetal diagnosis
- Thread starter THE_DEVIL
- Start date
Wait - you said abortion is a "mortal sin" before. She is having an abortion - how do you twist things so that she isn't committing a "mortal sin"?
This should be good.
Mortal sins can be repented of, plus there are several factors that go into mortal sin, like her life being in danger.
It's a complex topic.
Answer these questions:
1.) When does human life begin?
2.) Should their be any limits on abortion?
LOL - I have no idea. Could be many, could be none. But that's not necessarily the point of debate. The majority of my motivation is to expose misinformation and stupidity. Most of the time I watch others do it very well. On occasion I like to take a turn at it. It's entertaining watching you and others twist yourself into knots trying to defend the undefendable.
You're a pretty terrible debater, all due respect. You bring in stuff that no one said before, make assumptions and name call.
I'd love to go against you in court and I'm not a lawyer.
I am and I don’t believe in abortion. That said, I don’t believe government should be dictating medical procedures availability. If someone wants to commit a sin, that is between them and their God.Aren't you Catholic, Runk??
Abortion is a big no-no for us. Mortal sin territory. We're all waiting to die at this point.
BTW, tonight is the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. I'm going soon.
Masstimes.org
You're hilarious. First you cite the catholic church who states abortion is a "mortal sin" and then you selectively choose to ignore that distinction for someone who is getting an abortion because it's "complicated". FFS - it's "complicated" in every situation - not just those you choose to recognize.
You're such a hypocrite.
Mortal sin is complex. It involves full knowledge and consent of the will.
And it can always be repented.
I promote government staying as much out of my life as possible.
When you answer the questions posed of you. You don't get to be a coward when asked and then come out expecting your questions to be answered.
I answered the ones I was able to answer.
We're wasting time if you won't answer my two basic questions.
You wouldn't. Your bullshit would be exposed completely as you would be forced to answer questions posed.You're a pretty terrible debater, all due respect. You bring in stuff that no one said before, make assumptions and name call.
I'd love to go against you in court and I'm not a lawyer.
You're one of the easiest posters on here to discredit.
Then there is nothing distinguishing this woman than someone who is doing it for mere convenience. It is a mortal sin for both, and they both can repent.
You're not helping your case with this. I don't think this woman is having an abortion against her will or without full knowledge. But you are aware of that. This is just you slithering around again.
GFY - there isn't a question posed that you can't answer. You're simply a coward.
Exactly. But he won't acknowledge that because it demonstrates his position is irrational.
There's a big difference between having an abortion for birth control and doing it to save one's life.
God will be the judge.
Love it. Flogged into submission.
By your own definition, there is most certainly not a big difference.
Except the catholic church doesn't see it that way. All abortion is a "mortal sin". You want to use that position when it's convenient and then back pedal from it when it's more "complicated".
Completely. If we were in court you would be held in contempt for not answering questions and convicted of being a hypocrite.
You're a pretty terrible debater, all due respect. You bring in stuff that no one said before, make assumptions and name call.
I'd love to go against you in court and I'm not a lawyer.
Lol. I disagree withRiley as often as I disagree with you. But he is far better at debate because, fundamentally, he is rational and you are not.
What circumstances has the catholic church stated that make abortion acceptable?
I don't think he's rational.
He name calls posters here all day. Check out his post history.
You consider it "name calling" when it's actually just describing your behavior. You don't like it. I don't care. Call it like I see it.
Besides, calling names has nothing to do with having a rational argument. Something else you're getting wrong.
I think we agree more than not. When we don't, we really don't though.
Art at least admits he's an atheist.
You're more emotional and you strawman other people's positions.
This is why you're a poor debater.
The question is, can you? Apparently you just pick out the pieces you want to believe and follow and ignore the rest.
BTW - the answer to the question I posed to you is - nowhere.
Why would I admit to being something I am not?Art at least admits he's an atheist.
Or is that another one of your lame passive-aggressive attempts at a put down?
I'm not Thomas Aquinas, that's for sure.
Aquinas and Happiness
One of Aquinas' views on happiness is: An imperfect happiness (felicitas) is attainable in this lifetime, in proportion to the exercise of Reason (contemplation of truth) and the exercise of virtue.
www.pursuit-of-happiness.org
Latest posts
-
-
-
Four-Star, No. 44 Player in 2025 Planning Official Visit with MBB
- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
