In the posts I've provided to you, the Committee outright states THEY did not have any control over the criteria provided to THEM.
Who do you think came up with those criteria for selections? Bugs Bunny?
![9a81c8aef8f624b4691774574a493f1f.gif](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2Foriginals%2F9a%2F81%2Fc8%2F9a81c8aef8f624b4691774574a493f1f.gif&hash=18a568b3f3e388090ef566adb79a68f2)
In the posts I've provided to you, the Committee outright states THEY did not have any control over the criteria provided to THEM.
Who do you think came up with those criteria for selections? Bugs Bunny?
Name calling…. Tactic for when slow Joe/Angel doesn’t have any facts to support them.Kind of obvious w/ your posting history.
You continue to assign an opinion to me with no support for it.Yes; it absolutely was.
The committee deferred to her; the committee did not "choose their own" criteria.
That was stated outright - the committee chair stated it outright - they could only decide based on the criteria provided TO them.
And yet, here you are, claiming the actual coaching staff AND coach had no influence or say in any of those criteria. They absolutely did.
You just said it was your name.Name calling
You've been "supporting" the folks here whining for pages, buddy.You continue to assign an opinion to me with no support for it.
Still trueIn the posts I've provided to you, the Committee outright states THEY did not have any control over the criteria provided to THEM.
Who do you think came up with those criteria for selections? Bugs Bunny?
Still false.Still true