ADVERTISEMENT

The Elon Musk Twitter shitshow

Apparently at Harvard calling for the annihilation of a race of people is not considered harassment nor against Harvard’s code of conduct.

I do not share their genocidal tolerant values. These people sicken me. Shame on them. For shame!

 
  • Like
Reactions: Scruddy
Apparently at Harvard calling for the annihilation of a race of people is not considered harassment nor against Harvard’s code of conduct.

I do not share their genocidal tolerant values. These people sicken me. Shame on them. For shame!


Um, no.

The "harassment" rules that schools have in place are for direct contact with harassing individuals. Not making outlandish, racist general statements.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Scruddy


“Harvard's endowment has grown by $30B in the last 30 years

Yet the student population has barely grown in that same time period

These elite college are essentially tax-free asset managers, whose presidents' are morally bankrupt

If they don't fire the presidents and grow student population, we should tax the sh*t out of them.”

tenor.gif
 
If we're going to forgive student loans we should take all of that money out of the university endowments to pay for it. They're leftists so certainly they'd agree to give up their own wealth for the causes they claim to care about? Right?
 
Elon is FOS

Were he serious here, he would have eliminated 80% of his Twitter followers.
X is Statistically ahead of Facebook, tik tok, etc in controlling hate speech. You should check out leftist mastodon. If you can navigate your way around the child porn then you'll see there's also more than enough anti-semitism for your ilk.
 


So who will Elon blame when he loses more advertisers because of his decision to bring back Alex Jones? He's already blamed the Jews, and a media company. Will it be the blacks or the gays this time?
Should Elon let a poll on X decide who is allowed back onto X?

What’s your preferred method to letting that particular online community decide?
 
I
Should Elon let a poll on X decide who is allowed back onto X?

What’s your preferred method to letting that particular online community decide?

Letting an anonymous poll decide if you should allow one of the most toxic names in American politics/culture back on your platform seems silly to me. Especially when the platform already has an image problem with advertisers.
 


“While I understand the desire to have the presidents of @harvard, @MIT, and @Penn resign/be fired as a result of their outrage testimony, in a sense this is a small and insignificant outcome. The parasitic ideas that led to their grotesque testimony have been festering in academia for decades, and have fully choked the larger culture. Getting rid of one administrator will simply result in another equally cowardly and lobotomized leader taking over. There is a long conveyor belt of such academic administrators. The battle can only be won on the ideological and epistemological battlefields. In the same way that Lysenkoism or blood letting are rejected ideas, the same must occur with all of the idea pathogens that define Woke Progressive Ideology.”
 


“One down.
Two to go.

This is only the very beginning of addressing the pervasive rot of antisemitism that has destroyed the most “prestigious” higher education institutions in America.

This forced resignation of the President of @Penn is the bare minimum of what is required.

These universities can anticipate a robust and comprehensive Congressional investigation of all facets of their institutions negligent perpetration of antisemitism including administrative, faculty, and overall leadership and governance.

@Harvard and @MIT, do the right thing. The world is watching.

In the case of @Harvard, President Gay was asked by me 17x whether calling for the genocide of Jews violates Harvard’s code of conduct.
She spoke her truth 17x. And the world heard.

In the case of @MIT, Dr. Kornbluth answered the question. “If targeted at individuals” ie dehumanizing the Jewish people in her answer.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scruddy
I really hope Phenom is Eloon. I mean, it would be pathetic that he spends his time here defending himself, but much less pathetic than some dude spending every day of his life defending everything eloon does.
How is that different than spending every day of your life attacking everything eloon does?
 


President Gay has become a major liability for Harvard University:

**🎥Shocking Video of President Gay’s Testimony to Congress on Tuesday, December 5’th below.**

1) If her inflammatory and Antisemitic statements continue Harvard will likely be charged under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI clarified to explicitly include Antisemitism by the Biden Administration on September 26, 2023.

2) Harvard and other endowments may lose special tax exempt status. Treasury may argue that by taking a specific political position against Jewish Americans, a position that would not be taken against other ethnic groups, Harvard is politicizing itself and thus subject to ordinary tax treatment. This would be disastrous to Harvard University and Harvard Corporation and this could involuntarily drag along other endowments into a taxable status.

3) Donors, both Jewish and the 90% of alumni who do not share Antisemitic views will vote with their feet and as much as a predicted 60-90% of future donations may be lost from the alumni base. Non-Jewish alumni will be reluctant to step into the political crossfires by supporting an institution that explicitly condones and protects genocidal statements (shockingly in President Gay's own words). The vast majority (97% of donations) are made on a non-anonymous basis in order to build legacy at Harvard and with 1000's of causes competing with Harvard - donors will be reluctant to donate and be labeled bigoted and complicit in genocidal rhetoric through a historic lens.

The Harvard Corporation has a Fiduciary duty to both the University and its alumni base to:

1) Remove President Gay effective immediately.
2) Take immediate action and expel students who are threatening and intimidating Jewish students with genocidial statements (no more teethless PR statements).

3) Outline specific policies that puts Harvard back into compliance to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI and takes away the risk of litigation, loss of federal funding, and loss of tax exempt status.

Action must be taken TODAY in order to turn around the disastrous mismanagement of Harvard University, Harvard Corporation, and the Harvard Brand by President Gay an institution President Gay inherited with a nearly 400 year track record and brand.

Harvard alumni can no longer sit on the sidelines and hope that President Gay “pivots from Antisemitism”.

We are asked at convocation to show class unity and to stand with our classmates. Today, Jewish Students and Alumni ask that ALL Harvad Alumni, Jewish, Arab, and Gentile, Straight or LGBTQ+, Black, Brown, White, Hispanic, stand with US and reject Genocide and its defenders.

We implore Harvard Corporation to build the moral courage and to defend their Fiduciary duty.

-A Concerned Alumni

#Harvard #Antisemitism #CivilRights
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT