Anyone who breaks the law should have to deal with it. He should do more than claim it, he should show it. Put up or shut up.
Including people like him who are certainly in gray areas of securities laws.
The Elon Musk Twitter shitshow
- Thread starter CleteyColgate
- Start date
Anyone who breaks the law should have to deal with it. He should do more than claim it, he should show it. Put up or shut up.
Including people like him who are certainly in gray areas of securities laws.
Yup.
Thorium reactors produce no fissile material that can be used for bombs, either.
Precisely WHY it was abandoned as a fuel source back in the 1970s.
I have renewables pictured in the background of my handle pic. Why, bc I own renewables.
Lots like to talk not many like to put up the cheddar to make stuff happen, they always want someone else to do it for them.
If they haven't boycotted Apple for their human rights violations in China they never will. Their political mouth is bigger than their political integrity.
It is like saying you are for Law and Order and then storming the US Capitol and trying to overturn a free and fair election. When it comes down to it people have very little political integrity or integrity in general, they are ruled by their most immediate emotions.
Also, Tim Cook is obviously now a right wing operative.
Last edited:
I'm told in this thread that is easier to build thousands of moon ships. Who to believe?...
A mule was cheaper and easier to get your farm power from when oil was discovered. They went and littered the world with oil rigs, refineries, oil tankers, and all manner of gas stations anyway.
Guess it had some other advantages to it beyond mere cost.
I can't. I don't know of anybody with one moon ship let alone thousands.
What you don’t know has been on display in this thread over and over.
We will be building hundreds of moon ships on the moon by the time we get our moon factories up and running.
I know enough to not fall for a huckster claiming that he can colonize the moon.
No.
Why Doesn't NASA Develop Reusable Rockets?
Why does NASA not develop reuseable rockets? This question was originally answered on Quora by Robert Frost.
www.forbes.com
Answer by Robert Frost, who works at NASA, on Quora:
NASA isn’t really in the rocket development business. NASA only gets involved in rocket building when the commercial market doesn’t have a product that can fulfill NASA’s needs. NASA doesn’t use enough rockets to make reusability worthwhile.
Last edited:
Lies. He was 97% investor in series A funding. He along with four others created Tesla. Two incorporated the company but they didn’t own the name Tesla. They didn’t have financial backing. They had no product. They had no employees. It was basically just an idea of a company until Elon & JB Straubel came along.
Eberhard lied to the other partners every step of the way and was booted from the company.
You dont know shit Huey. Quit acting like you do.
Tesla Motors founders: Now there are five
Ousted Tesla CEO Martin Eberhard, who sued Tesla, arrives at a resolution with the company over who can claim the "co-founder" title at the electric vehicle maker.
www.cnet.com
Tesla's Musk gloats over Eberhard ruling
Judge strikes down request that former CEO Martin Eberhard be declared one of only two founders of the automotive start-up.
www.cnet.com
Judge strikes down request that former CEO Martin Eberhard be declared one of only two founders of the automotive start-up.
Last edited:
You’re going to love Starship.
But the first reusable “spaceship” isn’t an attribution of Elon’s (or SpaceX). You would have to be ignorant to claim that. This isn’t to detract from him/them either.
Last edited:
Amazing what can happen when you talk to people rather than @ them on Twitter.
Our little boy Elon is growing up!
On a completely unrelated subject and showing my ignorance, that link says helium is the most lightweight gas in the periodic table. Hydrogen?Read this, assuming you can read.
Helium-3 nuclear fusion: what is it? Why is it making headlines?
Helion Energy just raised 500 million $ to develop a fusion reactor working with helium-3. With an additional 1.www.linkedin.com
I'll excerpt it:
The necessary temperature for D-3He fusion is about 4 times higher than that in ITER: about 600 million degrees. At such temperatures, the plasma loses quite a lot of energy by radiation.
For a D-3He reaction, the product of Beta and of the energy confinement time would need to be at least 25 times higher than in a D-T plasma. Such performance have never been achieved in current experiments.
No scheme has been demonstrated at scale yet, and technically it is quite challenging.
Here's another.
Helium-3 Mining On The Moon: Houston, We Have A Problem | Geology for Investors
www.geologyforinvestors.com
Who knows what they think in private?
They blow smoke up people's asses for a living.
People likely said the same thing to Magellan. Sail around the world, nah broski, you will likely fall off it.
It must be weird going through life with small goals and a tiny vision.
Weird. This says he didn't create Tesla. He was actually the company's fourth CEO.No.
Why Doesn't NASA Develop Reusable Rockets?
Why does NASA not develop reuseable rockets? This question was originally answered on Quora by Robert Frost.
Answer by Robert Frost, who works at NASA, on Quora:
NASA isn’t really in the rocket development business. NASA only gets involved in rocket building when the commercial market doesn’t have a product that can fulfill NASA’s needs. NASA doesn’t use enough rockets to make reusability worthwhile.
This has already been covered. Further, SpaceX doesn't use fully reusable rockets, either. Nobody does. But lots of outfits, including NASA, used reusable components, including spacecraft. It's like your Elon Fan club mind forgot all about the Space Shuttles in the early 1980s.No.
Why Doesn't NASA Develop Reusable Rockets?
Why does NASA not develop reuseable rockets? This question was originally answered on Quora by Robert Frost.
Answer by Robert Frost, who works at NASA, on Quora:
NASA isn’t really in the rocket development business. NASA only gets involved in rocket building when the commercial market doesn’t have a product that can fulfill NASA’s needs. NASA doesn’t use enough rockets to make reusability worthwhile.
If it ever happens. Musk promised it would have been up and running in June. But here we are with it not even leaving the launchpad in December. Also something that has already been covered.You’re going to love Starship.
If not for anything but the infrastructure.... imagine how expensive it would have be to build it from scratch
Personally I find it weird that anybody could believe that we'll colonize the moon soon. There is literally no aspect of this that is achievable. You understand this, right? Please tell me you understand this.
That is the thing about goals, you will never get there if you don't first start taking steps in that direction. It may not be an our lifetime thing but it certainly should be for our kids or grandkids.
In the 60s and 70s the goals were to have flying cars and jetpacks and colonize the moon by the new millennium. Goals are great but they don't always follow the timeline the promoters throw out.
