ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

Guessing there's a combination of things going on. Not all pictures of destroyed tanks are from Javelins. RPG-7s, NLAWs, AT4s, etc have been being used as well, along with a bunch of other munitions. Of those that have been hit with Javelins, I'm guessing many look like the videos you linked. Others might have hit differently, and while destroying the tank, doesn't have the wow factor.

You hit the tank in the engine/trans area or the front, it's likely to not explode. Hit the turret/fuel tanks, it likely will.
 
Why do we keep seeing videos of tanks and other armored vehicles blowing up but no Russian infantry nearby? I’m no military guy but they appear to be sitting ducks out there
I've been wondering that too. Maybe they can't convince the infantry to get out and screen the armor:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
Why do we keep seeing videos of tanks and other armored vehicles blowing up but no Russian infantry nearby? I’m no military guy but they appear to be sitting ducks out there

It's possible they're around, but flanking (off to the sides). We'll used one in support of the other, but not directly...meaning able to respond, but not right next to in the same area. To difficult to interlace effective fire between separate types of unit.
 
Norway’s favorite son.
Lyrics

Roland was a warrior from the Land of the Midnight Sun
With a Thompson gun for hire, fighting to be done
The deal was made in Denmark on a dark and stormy day
So he set out for Biafra to join the bloody fray
Through sixty-six and seven they fought the Congo war
With their fingers on their triggers, knee-deep in gore
For days and nights they battled the Bantu to their knees
They killed to earn their living and to help out the Congolese
Roland the Thompson gunner
Roland the Thompson gunner
His comrades fought beside him - Van Owen and the rest
But of all the Thompson gunners, Roland was the best
So the CIA decided they wanted Roland dead
That son-of-a-bitch Van Owen blew off Roland's head
Roland the headless Thompson gunner
Norway's bravest son (to even up the score)
They can still see his headless body stalking through the night
In the muzzle flash of Roland's Thompson gun
In the muzzle flash of Roland's Thompson gun
Roland searched the continent for the man who'd done him in
He found him in Mombassa in a barroom drinking gin
Roland aimed his Thompson gun - he didn't say a word
But he blew Van Owen's body from there to Johannesburg
Roland the headless Thompson gunner
Roland the headless Thompson gunner
Roland the headless Thompson gunner
Talkin' about the man
Roland the headless Thompson gunner
The eternal Thompson gunner
Still wandering through the night
Now it's ten years later but he still keeps up the fight
In Ireland, in Lebanon, in Palestine and Berkeley
Patty Hearst heard the burst of Roland's Thompson gun and bought it
Source: Musixmatch
Songwriters: Warren William Zevon / David Lindell
Roland The Headless Thompson Gunner lyrics © Zevon Music, Songs Of Universal Inc.


 
Why do we keep seeing videos of tanks and other armored vehicles blowing up but no Russian infantry nearby? I’m no military guy but they appear to be sitting ducks out there
If I were a 20 year old conscript invading a country I am so culturally aligned with, and not being welcomed as promised, I'd probably lay to the rear and say to myself, "F those guys in the tanks. They have tanks. They'll be fine".
I honestly think there is a lot of that going on.
 
Does anyone know if these artillery pieces left behind are compatible with the marvelous footage shared a page or two ago where a drone was marking targets for laser guided artillery blowing the shit out of Russian targets in the forest? Or is this "dumb" artillery from another era?
I think it is dumb artillery. I thought I recalled how they could put fins and a guidance head on a shell but maybe I was thinking of bombs. This article is interesting.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/r...super-optically-guided-artillery-shell-179554
 
Does anyone know if these artillery pieces left behind are compatible with the marvelous footage shared a page or two ago where a drone was marking targets for laser guided artillery blowing the shit out of Russian targets in the forest? Or is this "dumb" artillery from another era?
‘Dumb’ rounds.
The laser guided ones have slots for deployable fins:


krasnopol_s1.jpg
 
This is super late, but such a fun story.

The electric car chargers along one of the most important freeways in Russia are all down Monday after the Ukrainian company tasked with building the main components in the chargers used backdoor access to hack them, shut them down, and program anti-Putin/pro-Ukrainian messages to scroll past on their screens.

 
When I was in a BSB (Brigade Support BN), one of the big things we rehearsed and discussed was how to transition between offensive and sustainment operations. It has to be planned out, even if you don't know exactly when or where ahead of time. The requirements to maintain combat effectiveness (which the Russians haven't shown a great deal of) are quite different between the 2.
You’d probably enjoy the book Death Traps, by Belton Cooper.

Cooper served with the 3rd Armored Division during World War II, and saw action from the Invasion of Normandy in 1944 through the Allied invasion of Germany in 1945. He was tasked with the "recovery, repair, and maintenance" of US tanks during the war. As part of his duties he regularly traveled through "the void", an area ranging from a few miles to as many as 50 miles (80 km) between the front lines and US supply trains, to deliver loss reports to commanders, which were too sensitive to transmit via radio. He refers to this as "running the gauntlet", due to the tendency of Allied armored forces to bypass some German elements in their advance, leaving pockets of enemy forces between the quickly advancing armor, and the trailing infantry units.

To your point about maintaining the offensive, from the book:

The 3rd Armored Division entered combat in Normandy with 232 M4 Sherman tanks. During the European Campaign, the Division had some 648 Shermans completely destroyed in combat and we had another 700 knocked out, repaired, and put back into operation. This was a loss rate of 580 percent.
 
‘Dumb’ rounds.
The laser guided ones have slots for deployable fins:


krasnopol_s1.jpg
This perception is important. The wider the coalition, the stronger we seem and the more support we’ll get worldwide.
Before this war I had not heard of this stuff. Amazing technology killing the Russians!

 
Let me pose this question, and please try to answer intelligently and unemotional, did the well meaning environmental lobby in Europe play right into Putins hand by forcing a shutdown of coal and a switch to Russian natural gas? I personally know a former worker in the German coal industry who is receiving a pension for the rest of his life and spends his time now hunting wild hogs.
Coal is just so much dirtier than the rest of fossil fuels. I am no tree hugger but I think we can at least try to cut out the worst. If you have ever been to large cities in many Asian countries (China and Taiwan I have seen in person) you would agree.
 

I say this somewhat seriously, if you look at the upper/right of the screen at about the 8 or 9 sec mark, there is something flying across. I'm pretty sure that's the TC (tank commander). The shape is right. Unless there's a hatch cover or (as we call it) sponson cover roughly that shape.

I thought maybe a piece of the skirt, the armor covering the track, road wheels and idler arms. But I don't think the Russian tanks have that large of panels on the skirt. Plus, unless it was a mine just inside thw track on that side, it wouldn't fly off in that direction.
 
Last edited:
I say this somewhat seriously, if you look at the upper/right of the screen at about the 8 or 9 sec mark, there is something flying across. I'm pretty sure that's the TC (tank commander). The shape is right. Unless there's a hatch cover or (as we call it) sponson cover roughly that shape.

I thought maybe a piece of the skirt, the armor covering the track, road wheels and idler arms. But I don't think the Russian tanks have that large of panels on the skirt. Plus, unless it was a mine just inside thw track on that side, it wouldn't fly off in that direction.
You're right. That's a dude.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT