Because the future corporate lawyers in the State Dept and other US agencies are as petrified as some on here.
This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...
- Thread starter Nole Lou
- Start date
Because the future corporate lawyers in the State Dept and other US agencies are as petrified as some on here.
People in Russia think they’re liberating Ukraine from Nazis right now.
You think it might be possible they might be getting additional shit info, like, “St Petersburg just got blown to hell, fire comrade!”???
- Sep 13, 2002
- 99,163
- 208,015
- 113
Not necessary. I’d start with providing UKR forces with MiGs, tanks and anti-ship missiles.
Once that begins turning the tide, I’d favor an Eastern-European only “peacekeeping force” to go in to help rebuild Ukraine and provide support to finish clearing the country of Russians. Likely a force of Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians and the Baltic countries - armed to the teeth with the best NATO equipment.
Enough to rid Ukraine of Russians but not give Russia any conceivable claim of “existential threat.”
Whoever said we would first strike St Petersburg was trolling you. We aren't going to do that.
Good lord…exaggerate much?
So now taking the Nuclear threat seriously is interpreted as being cool with “10’s of millions of people being slaughtered”?
Why don’t we stick with the reality of the current situation.
Last edited:
Lolz. We just keep doing it for no reason.
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...-test-due-russia-nuclear-tensions-2022-04-01/
No shit? That’s what you got from that?
More like, evil dictator and evil dictator henchmen decide to launch and get the lower ranking guys who are currently fed so much bullshit in isolated launch facilities or subs that they’re under attack and to launch.
No idea how you got the idea that I was discussing an actual first strike. Weird.
I’d be down with most of that…
Maybe form a new “Warsaw pact” but aimed this time at reigning in the Russians. Now THAT would piss Putin off.
Exclusive: U.S. cancels ICBM test due to Russia nuclear tensions
The Pentagon first announced a delay of the test on March 2 after Russia said it was putting its nuclear forces on high alert.
I try not to pay too much attention to your fear porn/fantasies. A quick skim of your posts is about all you get.
In case you haven't read through all 450 pages these 3 know everything and nobody else should dare have an opinion. Just want everyone to know these guys cannot be challenged.
Good, do me a favor and stop responding to them. Better yet, show how big and tough you are and get over to Ukraine to fight the evil instead of being a pussy like me.
Have to get your passport in order, that seems to be a huge hiccup for the guys on HROT. Shit, we’d have close to a full Company by now if that wasn’t so difficult.
Very original. You should move to Hollywood and write movie scripts. With your imagination, you would make millions. It would be HUGE. Believe me!
More of a documentary.
“They Day They Put the Keyboards Down - How a group of HROT posters changed the course of the War in Ukraine because their pussy government didn’t want to”
Big hit with Keyboard Special Ops everywhere.
Link that he cheated please. Of course you have no link or proof. I see you decided not to get involved with why trump threatened a lawsuit to those who might reveal his grades. You are a hypocrite emeritus.
Another lie, proof or link please, but you have none. Tell us about trump. lol
Last edited:
I know your favorite president didn’t know what the nuclear triad is, but do you?
It’s nukes launched from the land - either from stationary positions or mobile launching platforms, the sea from nuclear subs, or from the air (like we did with Hiroshima and Nagasaki). You’re saying we’ll know where those nuclear subs, airplanes carrying nukes, and mobile launch platforms are? Our intelligence has proven to not be that up to snuff on Russia of late, considering we were shocked that its army didn’t take Ukraine in a few days. It stands to reason that Russia’s got nukes we don’t know about.
Last edited:
We have all that stuff, too.
Again, IF Putin should use tactical nukes, what should be our response?
That was the question.
I don’t know. That’s a little above all our pay grades.
I was addressing your contention that we’d be able to hit their “known” nuke sites without your admitting that there are probably some number (big? Small? How many nuke launch sites is a big number?) of nuke sites we don’t know about.
We called their bluff over nukes in 1962 and they backed down. It was not a fun time. Then, we were dealing with a Russian Premier who answered to the politburo. Now, I’m not sure the current dickhead answers to anyone. I’m just glad that the US doesn’t have an infantile narcissist making the decisions right now.
Afraid of escalation? Um, yeah. That seems to be the conventional wisdom by most everyone outside of our intel experts on HROT.
I’m all ears for alternative ideas though Joe.
Concerned it'll be misinterpreted as a "first strike".
Meanwhile, a NFZ over Ukraine isn't remotely close to that.
Nor is clearing Russian ships out of Ukrainian waters.
Russia doesn't need the US to actually go through with the test to say that to their people. They can show them some past video bullshit.
